Long-term effects of thinning on soil organic carbon fractions and carbon pool management indices in secondary forests of heavily burned areas.

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Haixing Li, Xiuling Man, Tijiu Cai
{"title":"Long-term effects of thinning on soil organic carbon fractions and carbon pool management indices in secondary forests of heavily burned areas.","authors":"Haixing Li, Xiuling Man, Tijiu Cai","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite decades of recovery, soil carbon in heavily burned areas has failed to reach pre-fire levels. It is unclear whether stand management practices can promote soil organic carbon accumulation at such sites. This study evaluated the changes in soil labile organic carbon (LOC) fractions (including dissolved organic carbon (DOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), and easily oxidizable organic carbon (EOC)) and the carbon pool management index (CPMI) after the thinning of a heavily burned area in the Daxing'an Mountains and selected sample plots. This study compared thinned birch secondary forests (17 years (17a-S), 14 years (14a-U), 2 years (2a-S) post-thinning, where 17a-S and 2a-S were strip thinned and 14a-U was uniform thinned) with unthinned control (CK) plots. The contents of soil LOC and CPMI at a depth of 0-10 cm were found to increase with thinning, indicating that thinning promoted the accumulation of soil organic carbon in secondary forests in heavily burned areas. The two-way ANOVA showed that the differences in C fractions and CPMI at different times after thinning were significant, whereas the differences between thinning methods were not significant. In comparison to CK, only the DOC content was found to be significantly elevated at 2a-S. However, at both 14a-U and 17a-S, the elevation of the LOC fraction content reached a significant level. Among them, 14a-U demonstrated the most pronounced improvement (DOC (+11.37%), MBC (+42.80%), and EOC (+19.51%)). The CPMI at the 0-10 cm depth also increased significantly (18.20% ∼ 27.77%) at 14a-U. The study revealed that soil bulk density and understorey vegetation biomass were the main influences on the changes in soil LOC fractions and CPMI post-thinning. This finding also indicates that greater attention should be given not only to the soil itself but also to the understorey vegetation during forest soil carbon restoration under conservation management.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"371 ","pages":"123273"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123273","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite decades of recovery, soil carbon in heavily burned areas has failed to reach pre-fire levels. It is unclear whether stand management practices can promote soil organic carbon accumulation at such sites. This study evaluated the changes in soil labile organic carbon (LOC) fractions (including dissolved organic carbon (DOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), and easily oxidizable organic carbon (EOC)) and the carbon pool management index (CPMI) after the thinning of a heavily burned area in the Daxing'an Mountains and selected sample plots. This study compared thinned birch secondary forests (17 years (17a-S), 14 years (14a-U), 2 years (2a-S) post-thinning, where 17a-S and 2a-S were strip thinned and 14a-U was uniform thinned) with unthinned control (CK) plots. The contents of soil LOC and CPMI at a depth of 0-10 cm were found to increase with thinning, indicating that thinning promoted the accumulation of soil organic carbon in secondary forests in heavily burned areas. The two-way ANOVA showed that the differences in C fractions and CPMI at different times after thinning were significant, whereas the differences between thinning methods were not significant. In comparison to CK, only the DOC content was found to be significantly elevated at 2a-S. However, at both 14a-U and 17a-S, the elevation of the LOC fraction content reached a significant level. Among them, 14a-U demonstrated the most pronounced improvement (DOC (+11.37%), MBC (+42.80%), and EOC (+19.51%)). The CPMI at the 0-10 cm depth also increased significantly (18.20% ∼ 27.77%) at 14a-U. The study revealed that soil bulk density and understorey vegetation biomass were the main influences on the changes in soil LOC fractions and CPMI post-thinning. This finding also indicates that greater attention should be given not only to the soil itself but also to the understorey vegetation during forest soil carbon restoration under conservation management.

疏伐对重度烧毁地区次生林土壤有机碳组分和碳库管理指数的长期影响。
尽管经过几十年的恢复,严重烧毁地区的土壤碳仍未能达到火灾前的水平。目前还不清楚林分管理措施能否促进这些地区土壤有机碳的积累。本研究评估了大兴安岭重度焚烧区疏伐后土壤可溶性有机碳(LOC)组分(包括溶解性有机碳(DOC)、微生物生物量碳(MBC)和易氧化有机碳(EOC))的变化以及碳库管理指数(CPMI)。本研究将疏伐后的桦木次生林(疏伐后 17 年(17a-S)、14 年(14a-U)、2 年(2a-S),其中 17a-S 和 2a-S 为条状疏伐,14a-U 为均匀疏伐)与未疏伐对照(CK)样地进行了比较。结果发现,疏伐后 0-10 厘米深的土壤有机碳和 CPMI 含量增加,表明疏伐促进了重度烧毁地区次生林土壤有机碳的积累。双因子方差分析结果表明,疏伐后不同时间的 C 分量和 CPMI 差异显著,而不同疏伐方法的差异不显著。与 CK 相比,只有 2a-S 的 DOC 含量显著升高,但 14a-U 和 17a-S 的 LOC 部分含量升高达到了显著水平。其中,14a-U 的改善最为明显(DOC(+11.37%)、MBC(+42.80%)和 EOC(+19.51%))。研究表明,土壤容重和林下植被生物量是影响疏伐后土壤 LOC 分量和 CPMI 变化的主要因素。这一研究结果也表明,在森林保护管理下进行森林土壤碳修复时,不仅要关注土壤本身,还要更多地关注林下植被。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信