Effectiveness and Safety of a Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Chin Augmentation and Correction of Chin Retrusion: A Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Zhifeng Liao, Jianxun Ma, Xi Bu, Yanjun Zhang, Shiliang Wang, Yuxin Hou, Julien Clément, Xueqing Hu, Hongliang Bo, Ang Zeng, Nanze Yu, Sheng-Kang Luo, Bi Li
{"title":"Effectiveness and Safety of a Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Chin Augmentation and Correction of Chin Retrusion: A Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Zhifeng Liao, Jianxun Ma, Xi Bu, Yanjun Zhang, Shiliang Wang, Yuxin Hou, Julien Clément, Xueqing Hu, Hongliang Bo, Ang Zeng, Nanze Yu, Sheng-Kang Luo, Bi Li","doi":"10.1007/s00266-024-04494-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The chin significantly influences facial aesthetics, contributing to the overall balance and harmony of the face. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the hyaluronic acid filler Hyamax® Volumizer for chin augmentation and correction of chin retrusion compared to a no-treatment control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants aged 18-55 years with mild to moderate chin retrusion were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive either the treatment group (n = 150) or control group (n = 50). Evaluations included blinded assessments using the validated Galderma Chin Retrusion Scale, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale for aesthetic enhancement, and safety follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Galderma Chin Retrusion Scale responder rate (≥1 grade improvement) was significantly higher for the treatment group (70%) compared to the control group (0%) at 6 months (p < 0.0001), and remained higher at 12 months (54.67% vs. 0%; p < 0.0001). Aesthetic improvement rates were consistently high as reported by both blinded evaluating investigator (≥89.33%) and subjects (≥91.33%). Treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hyamax® Volumizer treatment is safe and effective when injected in the chin to treat chin retrusion, with results lasting through 1 year.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence i: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04494-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The chin significantly influences facial aesthetics, contributing to the overall balance and harmony of the face. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the hyaluronic acid filler Hyamax® Volumizer for chin augmentation and correction of chin retrusion compared to a no-treatment control.

Methods: Participants aged 18-55 years with mild to moderate chin retrusion were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive either the treatment group (n = 150) or control group (n = 50). Evaluations included blinded assessments using the validated Galderma Chin Retrusion Scale, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale for aesthetic enhancement, and safety follow-up.

Results: The Galderma Chin Retrusion Scale responder rate (≥1 grade improvement) was significantly higher for the treatment group (70%) compared to the control group (0%) at 6 months (p < 0.0001), and remained higher at 12 months (54.67% vs. 0%; p < 0.0001). Aesthetic improvement rates were consistently high as reported by both blinded evaluating investigator (≥89.33%) and subjects (≥91.33%). Treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate.

Conclusion: Hyamax® Volumizer treatment is safe and effective when injected in the chin to treat chin retrusion, with results lasting through 1 year.

Level of evidence i: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

玻尿酸填充剂用于隆下巴和矫正下巴凹陷的有效性和安全性:多中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验。
背景:下巴对面部美观有很大影响,有助于面部的整体平衡与和谐。本研究旨在评估透明质酸填充剂 Hyamax® Volumizer 与无治疗对照组相比,在丰下巴和矫正下巴后缩方面的效果:方法:年龄在 18-55 岁之间、下巴轻度至中度后缩的参与者按 3:1 的比例随机分配到治疗组(n = 150)或对照组(n = 50)。评估包括使用经过验证的 Galderma 下巴后缩量表进行盲法评估、全球美学改善量表进行美学提升以及安全随访:在 6 个月时,治疗组的 Galderma 下巴回缩量表应答率(改善≥1 级)(70%)明显高于对照组(0%)(p < 0.0001),在 12 个月时仍然较高(54.67% 对 0%;p < 0.0001)。根据盲法评估研究者(≥89.33%)和受试者(≥91.33%)的报告,美学改善率一直很高。与治疗相关的不良反应为轻度至中度:在下巴注射Hyamax® Volumizer治疗下巴后缩安全有效,效果可持续1年:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整说明,请参阅目录或在线作者须知 www.springer.com/00266 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信