Dimple Pruthi, Qingyang Zhu, Wenhao Wang and Yang Liu*,
{"title":"Multiresolution Analysis of HRRR Meteorological Parameters and GOES-R AOD for Hourly PM2.5 Prediction","authors":"Dimple Pruthi, Qingyang Zhu, Wenhao Wang and Yang Liu*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c0379510.1021/acs.est.4c03795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >High-resolution, comprehensive exposure data are crucial for accurately estimating the human health impact of PM<sub>2.5</sub>. In recent years, satellite remote sensing data have been increasingly utilized in PM<sub>2.5</sub> models to overcome the limited spatial coverage of ground monitoring stations. However, data gaps in satellite-retrieved parameters such as aerosol optical depth (AOD), the sparsity of regulatory air quality monitors for model training, and nonlinear relationships between PM<sub>2.5</sub> and meteorological conditions can affect model performance and cause data gaps in most existing PM<sub>2.5</sub> models. In this study, spatial gaps in AOD obtained from Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-16 are filled using Goddard Earth Observing System Composition Forecasting AOD estimations. Furthermore, to improve model performance, meteorological predictors such as temperature from the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh model are preprocessed using Daubechies wavelet to extract low and high frequency components. The spatially gap-filled AOD, along with meteorological data, are ingested into a machine learning model to predict hourly PM<sub>2.5</sub> at a 1 km spatial resolution in California. The model evaluation metrics (OOB (out-of-bag) R<sup>2</sup> = 0.86 and RMSE (root-mean-square error) = 9.27 μg/m<sup>3</sup> and 10-fold spatial cross-validation R<sup>2</sup> = 0.82 and RMSE = 9.82 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) demonstrate the model’s reliability in predicting ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub>, especially for states like California that experience frequent episodes of wildfires.</p><p >By incorporating the spatially filled GOES-AOD high resolution product and using wavelet transforms, the hourly seamless PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations across California are well estimated at 1 km.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"58 45","pages":"20040–20048 20040–20048"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.est.4c03795","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c03795","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
High-resolution, comprehensive exposure data are crucial for accurately estimating the human health impact of PM2.5. In recent years, satellite remote sensing data have been increasingly utilized in PM2.5 models to overcome the limited spatial coverage of ground monitoring stations. However, data gaps in satellite-retrieved parameters such as aerosol optical depth (AOD), the sparsity of regulatory air quality monitors for model training, and nonlinear relationships between PM2.5 and meteorological conditions can affect model performance and cause data gaps in most existing PM2.5 models. In this study, spatial gaps in AOD obtained from Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-16 are filled using Goddard Earth Observing System Composition Forecasting AOD estimations. Furthermore, to improve model performance, meteorological predictors such as temperature from the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh model are preprocessed using Daubechies wavelet to extract low and high frequency components. The spatially gap-filled AOD, along with meteorological data, are ingested into a machine learning model to predict hourly PM2.5 at a 1 km spatial resolution in California. The model evaluation metrics (OOB (out-of-bag) R2 = 0.86 and RMSE (root-mean-square error) = 9.27 μg/m3 and 10-fold spatial cross-validation R2 = 0.82 and RMSE = 9.82 μg/m3) demonstrate the model’s reliability in predicting ambient PM2.5, especially for states like California that experience frequent episodes of wildfires.
By incorporating the spatially filled GOES-AOD high resolution product and using wavelet transforms, the hourly seamless PM2.5 concentrations across California are well estimated at 1 km.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences.
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.