One Third of Alcohol Use Disorder Diagnoses are Missed by ICD Coding.

Laura Mercurio, Augusto Garcia, Stephanie Ruest, Susan J Duffy, Carsten Eickhoff
{"title":"One Third of Alcohol Use Disorder Diagnoses are Missed by ICD Coding.","authors":"Laura Mercurio, Augusto Garcia, Stephanie Ruest, Susan J Duffy, Carsten Eickhoff","doi":"10.1177/29767342241288112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/significance: </strong>Alcohol use carries significant morbidity and mortality, yet accurate identification of alcohol use disorder (AUD) remains a multi-layered problem for both researchers and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To fine-tune a language model to AUD in the clinical narrative and to detect AUDs not accounted for by ICD-9 coding in the MIMIC-III database.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We applied clinicalBERT to unique patient discharge summaries. For classification, patients were divided into nonoverlapping groups stratified by the presence/absence of AUD ICD diagnosis for model training (80%), validation (10%), and testing (10%). For detection, the model was trained (80%) and validated (20%) on 1:1 positive/negative patients, then applied to remaining negative patient population. Physicians adjudicated 600 samples from the full model confidence spectrum to confirm AUD by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-V criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model exhibited the following characteristics (mean, standard deviation): precision (0.9, 0.02), recall (0.65, 0.03), F-1 (0.75, 0.02), area under the receiver operating curve (0.97, 0.01), and area under the precision-recall curve (0.86, 0.01). Adjudication produced an estimated 4% under-documentation rate for the total study population. As model confidence increased, AUD under-documentation rate rose to 30% of the number of patients identified as positive by ICD-9 coding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our model improves the identification of patients meeting AUD criteria, outperforming ICD codes in detecting cases of AUD. Detection discrepancy between ICD and free-text highlights clinician <i>under documentation</i>, not under recognition. Adjudication revealed model over-sensitivity to language around substance use, withdrawal, and chronic liver disease; future study requires application to a broader set of patient age and acuity. This model has the potential to improve rapid identification of patients with AUD and enhance treatment allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241288112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/significance: Alcohol use carries significant morbidity and mortality, yet accurate identification of alcohol use disorder (AUD) remains a multi-layered problem for both researchers and clinicians.

Objective: To fine-tune a language model to AUD in the clinical narrative and to detect AUDs not accounted for by ICD-9 coding in the MIMIC-III database.

Materials and methods: We applied clinicalBERT to unique patient discharge summaries. For classification, patients were divided into nonoverlapping groups stratified by the presence/absence of AUD ICD diagnosis for model training (80%), validation (10%), and testing (10%). For detection, the model was trained (80%) and validated (20%) on 1:1 positive/negative patients, then applied to remaining negative patient population. Physicians adjudicated 600 samples from the full model confidence spectrum to confirm AUD by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-V criteria.

Results: The model exhibited the following characteristics (mean, standard deviation): precision (0.9, 0.02), recall (0.65, 0.03), F-1 (0.75, 0.02), area under the receiver operating curve (0.97, 0.01), and area under the precision-recall curve (0.86, 0.01). Adjudication produced an estimated 4% under-documentation rate for the total study population. As model confidence increased, AUD under-documentation rate rose to 30% of the number of patients identified as positive by ICD-9 coding.

Conclusion: Our model improves the identification of patients meeting AUD criteria, outperforming ICD codes in detecting cases of AUD. Detection discrepancy between ICD and free-text highlights clinician under documentation, not under recognition. Adjudication revealed model over-sensitivity to language around substance use, withdrawal, and chronic liver disease; future study requires application to a broader set of patient age and acuity. This model has the potential to improve rapid identification of patients with AUD and enhance treatment allocation.

ICD 编码遗漏了三分之一的酒精使用障碍诊断。
背景/意义:饮酒会导致严重的发病率和死亡率,但准确识别饮酒障碍(AUD)仍然是研究人员和临床医生面临的一个多层次问题:目的:对临床叙述中的 AUD 语言模型进行微调,并检测 MIMIC-III 数据库中 ICD-9 编码未包含的 AUD:我们将 clinicalBERT 应用于唯一的患者出院摘要。在分类时,根据是否存在 AUD ICD 诊断将患者分为非重叠组,分别进行模型训练(80%)、验证(10%)和测试(10%)。在检测方面,对 1:1 的阳性/阴性患者进行模型训练(80%)和验证(20%),然后应用于剩余的阴性患者群体。医生根据《精神障碍诊断与统计手册-V》的标准,对整个模型置信区间的 600 个样本进行判定,以确认 AUD:该模型具有以下特征(平均值,标准偏差):精确度(0.9,0.02)、召回率(0.65,0.03)、F-1(0.75,0.02)、接收者工作曲线下面积(0.97,0.01)和精确度-召回率曲线下面积(0.86,0.01)。在所有研究人群中,通过判定得出的记录不足率估计为 4%。随着模型置信度的增加,AUD 记录不足率上升到 ICD-9 编码确定为阳性患者人数的 30%:结论:我们的模型能更好地识别符合 AUD 标准的患者,在发现 AUD 病例方面优于 ICD 编码。ICD 与自由文本之间的检测差异凸显了临床医生记录不足,而非识别不足。判定结果表明,该模型对药物使用、戒断和慢性肝病的语言过于敏感;未来的研究需要将其应用于更广泛的患者年龄和病情。该模型有望改善对 AUD 患者的快速识别,并加强治疗分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信