Vascular and nerve biomarkers in thigh skin biopsies differentiate painful from painless diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2024-10-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpain.2024.1485420
Gordon Sloan, Philippe Donatien, Rosario Privitera, Pallai Shillo, Sharon Caunt, Dinesh Selvarajah, Praveen Anand, Solomon Tesfaye
{"title":"Vascular and nerve biomarkers in thigh skin biopsies differentiate painful from painless diabetic peripheral neuropathy.","authors":"Gordon Sloan, Philippe Donatien, Rosario Privitera, Pallai Shillo, Sharon Caunt, Dinesh Selvarajah, Praveen Anand, Solomon Tesfaye","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2024.1485420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying distinct mechanisms and biomarkers for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is required for advancing the treatment of this major global unmet clinical need. We previously provided evidence in calf skin biopsies that disproportion between reduced sensory small nerve fibers and increased blood vessels may distinguish painful from non-painful DPN. We proposed that overexposure of the reduced nerve fibers in DPN to increased hypoxemia-induced vasculature and related algogenic factors, e.g., nerve growth factor (NGF), leads to neuropathic pain. To further investigate this proposed mechanism, we have now studied more proximal thigh skin biopsies, to see if the same disproportion between increased vasculature and decreased nerve fibers generally differentiates painful DPN from painless DPN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 28 subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and 13 healthy volunteers (HV) underwent detailed clinical and neurophysiological assessments, based on the neuropathy composite score of the lower limbs [NIS(LL)] plus 7 tests. T2DM subjects were subsequently divided into three groups: painful DPN (<i>n</i> = 15), painless DPN (<i>n</i> = 7), and no DPN (<i>n</i> = 6). All subjects underwent skin punch biopsy from the upper lateral thigh 20 cm below the anterior iliac spine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Skin biopsies showed decreased PGP 9.5-positive intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density in both painful DPN (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and painless DPN (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Vascular marker von Willebrand Factor (vWF) density was markedly increased in painful DPN vs. other groups, including painless DPN (<i>p</i> = 0.01). There was a resulting significant decrease in the ratio of intraepidermal nerve fiber density to vasculature and PGP9.5 to vWF, in painful DPN vs. painless DPN (<i>p</i> = 0.05). These results were similar in pattern to those observed in these HV and T2DM groups previously in distal calf biopsies; however, the increase in vWF was much higher and nerve fiber density much lower in the calf than thigh for painful DPN. Thigh skin vWF density was significantly correlated with several metabolic (waist/hip ratio, HbA1c), clinical (e.g., pain score), and neurophysiological measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports our proposal that increased dermal vasculature, and its disproportionate ratio to reduced nociceptors, may help differentiate painful DPN from painless DPN. This disproportion is greater in the distal calf than the proximal thigh skin; hence, neuropathic pain in DPN is length-dependent and first localized to the distal lower limbs, mainly feet.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2024.1485420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identifying distinct mechanisms and biomarkers for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is required for advancing the treatment of this major global unmet clinical need. We previously provided evidence in calf skin biopsies that disproportion between reduced sensory small nerve fibers and increased blood vessels may distinguish painful from non-painful DPN. We proposed that overexposure of the reduced nerve fibers in DPN to increased hypoxemia-induced vasculature and related algogenic factors, e.g., nerve growth factor (NGF), leads to neuropathic pain. To further investigate this proposed mechanism, we have now studied more proximal thigh skin biopsies, to see if the same disproportion between increased vasculature and decreased nerve fibers generally differentiates painful DPN from painless DPN.

Methods: A total of 28 subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and 13 healthy volunteers (HV) underwent detailed clinical and neurophysiological assessments, based on the neuropathy composite score of the lower limbs [NIS(LL)] plus 7 tests. T2DM subjects were subsequently divided into three groups: painful DPN (n = 15), painless DPN (n = 7), and no DPN (n = 6). All subjects underwent skin punch biopsy from the upper lateral thigh 20 cm below the anterior iliac spine.

Results: Skin biopsies showed decreased PGP 9.5-positive intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density in both painful DPN (p < 0.0001) and painless DPN (p = 0.001). Vascular marker von Willebrand Factor (vWF) density was markedly increased in painful DPN vs. other groups, including painless DPN (p = 0.01). There was a resulting significant decrease in the ratio of intraepidermal nerve fiber density to vasculature and PGP9.5 to vWF, in painful DPN vs. painless DPN (p = 0.05). These results were similar in pattern to those observed in these HV and T2DM groups previously in distal calf biopsies; however, the increase in vWF was much higher and nerve fiber density much lower in the calf than thigh for painful DPN. Thigh skin vWF density was significantly correlated with several metabolic (waist/hip ratio, HbA1c), clinical (e.g., pain score), and neurophysiological measures.

Conclusion: This study supports our proposal that increased dermal vasculature, and its disproportionate ratio to reduced nociceptors, may help differentiate painful DPN from painless DPN. This disproportion is greater in the distal calf than the proximal thigh skin; hence, neuropathic pain in DPN is length-dependent and first localized to the distal lower limbs, mainly feet.

大腿皮肤活检中的血管和神经生物标志物可区分有痛和无痛糖尿病周围神经病变。
背景:糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)引起疼痛的独特机制和生物标志物的确定,是推动治疗这一全球未满足的重大临床需求所必需的。我们之前在小腿皮肤活检中提供的证据表明,感觉小神经纤维减少和血管增加之间的比例失调可能会区分疼痛性和非疼痛性 DPN。我们提出,DPN 中减少的神经纤维过度暴露于低氧血症引起的血管和相关致藻因子(如神经生长因子(NGF))的增加,导致神经性疼痛。为了进一步研究这一拟议机制,我们现在研究了更多的大腿近端皮肤活检组织,以了解血管增加和神经纤维减少之间的比例失调是否能区分疼痛型 DPN 和无痛型 DPN:共有 28 名 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者和 13 名健康志愿者(HV)接受了详细的临床和神经电生理评估,评估基于下肢神经病变综合评分[NIS(LL)]和 7 项测试。随后,T2DM 受试者被分为三组:疼痛型 DPN(15 人)、无痛型 DPN(7 人)和无 DPN(6 人)。所有受试者均在髂前棘下 20 厘米处的大腿外侧上部进行皮肤活检:结果:皮肤活检结果显示,两种疼痛型 DPN 的表皮内神经纤维(IENF)密度均下降(P = 0.001)。与包括无痛性 DPN 在内的其他组别相比,疼痛性 DPN 的血管标记物冯-威廉因子(vWF)密度明显增加(p = 0.01)。因此,在疼痛型 DPN 与无痛型 DPN 中,表皮内神经纤维密度与血管的比率以及 PGP9.5 与 vWF 的比率明显下降(p = 0.05)。这些结果与之前在这些 HV 组和 T2DM 组小腿远端活检中观察到的结果模式相似;但是,对于疼痛型 DPN,小腿的 vWF 增加幅度要比大腿高得多,而神经纤维密度则低得多。大腿皮肤的 vWF 密度与多项代谢(腰/臀比、HbA1c)、临床(如疼痛评分)和神经生理学测量指标显著相关:这项研究支持我们的建议,即真皮血管的增加及其与痛觉感受器减少不成比例的比例可能有助于区分疼痛型 DPN 和无痛型 DPN。这种比例失调在小腿远端比大腿近端皮肤更大;因此,DPN 的神经性疼痛是长度依赖性的,并首先定位在下肢远端,主要是足部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信