Evaluación piloto del programa «Transformem els patis» en escuelas de primaria de Barcelona

IF 1.5 4区医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

Gaceta Sanitaria Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gaceta.2024.102429

Jesús Periañez , Xavier Continente , Marta Sanz-Mas , Gemma Drou , Albert Espelt , Emma Cortés , María José López

{"title":"Evaluación piloto del programa «Transformem els patis» en escuelas de primaria de Barcelona","authors":"Jesús Periañez , Xavier Continente , Marta Sanz-Mas , Gemma Drou , Albert Espelt , Emma Cortés , María José López","doi":"10.1016/j.gaceta.2024.102429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the “Transformem els patis” (Let's transform the schoolyards) program in Barcelona in terms of schoolyard use, social interaction, physical activity, and diverse forms of play with a gender perspective.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A cross-sectional pilot evaluation study with mixed methodology involving eight primary schools (four in intervention group and four in control group). For the quantitative analysis, 16 systematic observations were performed in the schoolyards of both groups. The group size, group composition according to sex, physical activity, the carried-out activity and play structures or material use, and environmental variables were analyzed. For the qualitative analysis, three structured group interviews were held with teachers and the monitoring team of the intervention group. A thematic content analysis with a phenomenological perspective was conducted, exploring changes related to the physical schoolyard transformation, its educational use, and interactions among children, and the overall assessment of the schoolyard transformation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>192 groups of schoolchildren were observed in the intervention group and 203 in the control group. The transformed schoolyards had more natural elements, play structures, places to sit and non-cemented flooring. Compared to the non-transformed schoolyards, both in the boys’ and girls’ groups, a higher proportion of active play was registered, as well as a higher proportion of non-sport games and imaginative games among boys and a lower proportion of girls watched the schoolyard.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Transformed the schoolyards are more inclusive, naturalized, playable, and equitable, with a greater diversity of elements and play structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12494,"journal":{"name":"Gaceta Sanitaria","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 102429"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaceta Sanitaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911124000876","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the “Transformem els patis” (Let's transform the schoolyards) program in Barcelona in terms of schoolyard use, social interaction, physical activity, and diverse forms of play with a gender perspective.

Method

A cross-sectional pilot evaluation study with mixed methodology involving eight primary schools (four in intervention group and four in control group). For the quantitative analysis, 16 systematic observations were performed in the schoolyards of both groups. The group size, group composition according to sex, physical activity, the carried-out activity and play structures or material use, and environmental variables were analyzed. For the qualitative analysis, three structured group interviews were held with teachers and the monitoring team of the intervention group. A thematic content analysis with a phenomenological perspective was conducted, exploring changes related to the physical schoolyard transformation, its educational use, and interactions among children, and the overall assessment of the schoolyard transformation.

Results

192 groups of schoolchildren were observed in the intervention group and 203 in the control group. The transformed schoolyards had more natural elements, play structures, places to sit and non-cemented flooring. Compared to the non-transformed schoolyards, both in the boys’ and girls’ groups, a higher proportion of active play was registered, as well as a higher proportion of non-sport games and imaginative games among boys and a lower proportion of girls watched the schoolyard.

Conclusions

Transformed the schoolyards are more inclusive, naturalized, playable, and equitable, with a greater diversity of elements and play structures.

查看原文本刊更多论文

[巴塞罗那小学 "Transformem els patis "计划试点评估]。

目的从性别角度评估巴塞罗那的 "Transformem els patis"（让我们改造校园）计划在校园使用、社交互动、体育活动和多种游戏形式方面的效果：采用混合方法进行横向试点评估研究，涉及八所小学（干预组四所，对照组四所）。为了进行定量分析，对两组学校的操场进行了 16 次系统观察。对小组人数、小组性别构成、体育活动、开展的活动、游戏结构或材料使用以及环境变量进行了分析。为了进行定性分析，对干预组的教师和监督小组进行了三次结构化小组访谈。从现象学的角度进行了主题内容分析，探讨了与校园物理改造相关的变化、其教育用途、儿童之间的互动以及对校园改造的总体评价：结果：干预组观察了 192 组学童，对照组观察了 203 组学童。改造后的校园有更多的自然元素、游戏结构、座位和非水泥地面。与未改造的校园相比，在男孩和女孩组中，积极游戏的比例较高，非体育游戏和想象力游戏在男孩中的比例较高，而女孩观看校园的比例较低：经过改造的校园更具包容性、自然化、可玩性和公平性，游戏元素和游戏结构也更加多样。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Gaceta Sanitaria 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

5.30%

发文量

审稿时长

29 days

期刊介绍： Gaceta Sanitaria (Health Gazette) is an international journal that accepts articles in Spanish and in English. It is the official scientific journal of the Sociedad Española de Salud Publica y Administración Sanitaria (Spanish Society of Public Health and Health Administration) (SESPAS). The Journal publishes 6 issues per year on different areas of Public Health and Health Administration, including: -Applied epidemiology- Health prevention and promotion- Environmental health- International health- Management and assessment of policies and services- Health technology assessments- Health economics. The editorial process is regulated by a peer review system. It publishes original works, reviews, opinion articles, field and methodology notes, protocols, letters to the editor, editorials, and debates.