Development and validation of the competing risk nomogram and risk classification system for predicting cancer-specific mortality in patients with cervical adenosquamous carcinoma treated via radical hysterectomy.

0 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Jianying Yi, Jie Chen, Xi Cao, Lili Pi, Chunlei Zhou, Zhili Liu, Hong Mu
{"title":"Development and validation of the competing risk nomogram and risk classification system for predicting cancer-specific mortality in patients with cervical adenosquamous carcinoma treated via radical hysterectomy.","authors":"Jianying Yi, Jie Chen, Xi Cao, Lili Pi, Chunlei Zhou, Zhili Liu, Hong Mu","doi":"10.17305/bb.2024.11217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we established and validated a competing risk nomogram for predicting the cumulative incidence of cervical adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC)-specific death in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy. Patients diagnosed with ASC between 2010 and 2019 were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The cumulative incidence function (CIF) for various variables influencing ASC-specific mortality was computed. A Fine-Gray competing risk model was used to identify independent predictors, formulating a competing risk nomogram. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was also applied for comparative analysis. The performance of the nomogram was assessed using metrics such as the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). A corresponding risk classification system was constructed based on nomogram-derived scores. Factors such as advanced age, racial background (Black race), higher tumor grade, increased tumor size, advanced TNM stage, and receipt of radiotherapy without chemotherapy were found to be positively associated with elevated ASC-specific mortality. Additionally, age, T stage, M stage, and chemotherapy were identified as independent predictors correlated with ASC-specific mortality. The established nomogram exhibited accurate discriminatory capabilities and superior net benefits compared to the traditional TNM staging system. Additionally, the high-risk group consistently demonstrated higher probabilities of ASC-specific death in both the training and validation sets. The developed nomogram proficiently quantified the incidence of ASC-specific death in patients subjected to radical hysterectomy for ASC. This tool could help clinicians in formulating personalized treatment strategies and devising follow-up protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":72398,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17305/bb.2024.11217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we established and validated a competing risk nomogram for predicting the cumulative incidence of cervical adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC)-specific death in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy. Patients diagnosed with ASC between 2010 and 2019 were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The cumulative incidence function (CIF) for various variables influencing ASC-specific mortality was computed. A Fine-Gray competing risk model was used to identify independent predictors, formulating a competing risk nomogram. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was also applied for comparative analysis. The performance of the nomogram was assessed using metrics such as the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). A corresponding risk classification system was constructed based on nomogram-derived scores. Factors such as advanced age, racial background (Black race), higher tumor grade, increased tumor size, advanced TNM stage, and receipt of radiotherapy without chemotherapy were found to be positively associated with elevated ASC-specific mortality. Additionally, age, T stage, M stage, and chemotherapy were identified as independent predictors correlated with ASC-specific mortality. The established nomogram exhibited accurate discriminatory capabilities and superior net benefits compared to the traditional TNM staging system. Additionally, the high-risk group consistently demonstrated higher probabilities of ASC-specific death in both the training and validation sets. The developed nomogram proficiently quantified the incidence of ASC-specific death in patients subjected to radical hysterectomy for ASC. This tool could help clinicians in formulating personalized treatment strategies and devising follow-up protocols.

开发和验证竞争风险提名图和风险分类系统,用于预测经根治性子宫切除术治疗的宫颈腺鳞癌患者的癌症特异性死亡率。
在这项研究中,我们建立并验证了一种竞争风险提名图,用于预测接受根治性子宫切除术的患者中宫颈腺鳞癌(ASC)特异性死亡的累积发生率。从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中检索了2010年至2019年期间确诊为ASC的患者。计算了影响ASC特异性死亡率的各种变量的累积发生率函数(CIF)。采用Fine-Gray竞争风险模型确定独立预测因子,并绘制了竞争风险提名图。此外,还采用了多变量 Cox 比例危险模型进行比较分析。采用一致性指数(C-index)、接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)等指标对提名图的性能进行了评估。根据提名图得出的分数构建了相应的风险分类系统。研究发现,高龄、种族背景(黑人)、肿瘤分级较高、肿瘤体积增大、TNM 分期较晚、接受放疗而未接受化疗等因素与 ASC 特异性死亡率升高呈正相关。此外,年龄、T分期、M分期和化疗也是与ASC特异性死亡率相关的独立预测因素。与传统的 TNM 分期系统相比,已建立的提名图具有准确的判别能力和更高的净效益。此外,在训练集和验证集中,高风险组的 ASC 特异性死亡概率一直较高。所开发的提名图能有效量化因ASC而接受根治性子宫切除术的患者的ASC特异性死亡发生率。该工具有助于临床医生制定个性化治疗策略和随访方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信