The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish version of Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale in Systemic Sclerosis Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease.

IF 0.6 0 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Elif Gur Kabul, Pervin Demir, Berna Cagla Balkisli, Firdevs Ulutas, Sinem Yenil, Bilge Basakci Calik, Veli Cobankara
{"title":"The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish version of Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale in Systemic Sclerosis Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease.","authors":"Elif Gur Kabul, Pervin Demir, Berna Cagla Balkisli, Firdevs Ulutas, Sinem Yenil, Bilge Basakci Calik, Veli Cobankara","doi":"10.5152/ThoracResPract.2024.23135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) patients with Interstitial Lung Disease.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty patients diagnosed with SSc according to the 2013 EULAR/ACR criteria were included. After recording the demographic data of the patients, dyspnea was evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), exercise capacity with the 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD), fatigue level with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), disease activity with the Medsger Disease Severity Scale, skin involvement with the Modified Rodnan Skin Score, and dyspnea level with the mMRC Dyspnea Scale. The mMRC Dyspnea Scale was administered to the patients with SSc who did not receive any treatment for test-retest reliability at 1-week intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observed scale range in mMRC (TR) was 0-4, and twelve out of the thirty patients (40%) were classified as having \"moderate dyspnea.\" mMRC (TR) showed a significant moderate positive correlation with VAS dyspnea (rho: 0.718), a low negative correlation with 6MWD (rho: -0.445), and a low positive correlation with FSS (rho: 0.385). The weighted kappa statistic, used as an agreement scale for ordinal responses, was found to be 0.587 (indicating moderate agreement).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish version of the mMRC Dyspnea Scale demonstrates validity and reliability in SSc patients with interstitial lung disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":75221,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic research and practice","volume":"25 6","pages":"215-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/ThoracResPract.2024.23135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) patients with Interstitial Lung Disease.

Material and methods: Thirty patients diagnosed with SSc according to the 2013 EULAR/ACR criteria were included. After recording the demographic data of the patients, dyspnea was evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), exercise capacity with the 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD), fatigue level with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), disease activity with the Medsger Disease Severity Scale, skin involvement with the Modified Rodnan Skin Score, and dyspnea level with the mMRC Dyspnea Scale. The mMRC Dyspnea Scale was administered to the patients with SSc who did not receive any treatment for test-retest reliability at 1-week intervals.

Results: The observed scale range in mMRC (TR) was 0-4, and twelve out of the thirty patients (40%) were classified as having "moderate dyspnea." mMRC (TR) showed a significant moderate positive correlation with VAS dyspnea (rho: 0.718), a low negative correlation with 6MWD (rho: -0.445), and a low positive correlation with FSS (rho: 0.385). The weighted kappa statistic, used as an agreement scale for ordinal responses, was found to be 0.587 (indicating moderate agreement).

Conclusion: The Turkish version of the mMRC Dyspnea Scale demonstrates validity and reliability in SSc patients with interstitial lung disease.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

系统性硬化症间质性肺病患者呼吸困难量表土耳其语版的有效性和可靠性。
目的目的是研究土耳其版改良医学研究委员会(mMRC)呼吸困难量表在间质性肺病系统性硬化症(SSc)患者中的有效性和可靠性:根据 2013 年 EULAR/ACR 标准诊断为 SSc 的 30 名患者纳入研究。在记录了患者的人口统计学数据后,用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估呼吸困难程度,用 6 分钟步行距离(6MWD)评估运动能力,用疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)评估疲劳程度,用 Medsger 疾病严重程度量表评估疾病活动性,用改良罗德南皮肤评分法评估皮肤受累情况,用 mMRC 呼吸困难量表评估呼吸困难程度。对未接受任何治疗的 SSc 患者使用 mMRC 呼吸困难量表,每隔 1 周进行一次重复测试,以确定其可靠性:mMRC (TR) 与 VAS 呼吸困难呈显著的中度正相关(rho:0.718),与 6MWD 呈低度负相关(rho:-0.445),与 FSS 呈低度正相关(rho:0.385)。加权卡帕统计量(用于衡量序数反应的一致性)为 0.587(表明一致性适中):土耳其版 mMRC 呼吸困难量表在患有间质性肺病的 SSc 患者中具有有效性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信