Understanding the impact of COVID-19 on yoga instruction: Examining teaching methodology, class components, and injury patterns in the Northeastern US.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
SoJung Kim, June Solow, Donald H Lein, Harshvardhan Singh
{"title":"Understanding the impact of COVID-19 on yoga instruction: Examining teaching methodology, class components, and injury patterns in the Northeastern US.","authors":"SoJung Kim, June Solow, Donald H Lein, Harshvardhan Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.explore.2024.103079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine the impact of COVID-19 on the perspectives of yoga instructors (YIs) regarding teaching methodology, class components, and yoga-related injuries among their clients DESIGN: A cross-sectional design in this study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A total of 407 YIs from Northeastern United States completed a customized, web-based survey.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Chi-square tests were carried out to determine changes in yoga teaching format before and during the pandemic, as well as the counts of yoga related injuries between face-to-face (FtoF) and online teaching format. Independent t tests were used to compare the characteristics of yoga teaching elements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the pandemic, 47 % of YIs adopted online teaching, followed by a mixed (45.9 %) format and FtoF (7.1 %) instruction. Both online and FtoF classes showed similar trends, with most reporting class sizes of 4-6, followed by 7-9 and then 1-3 students. Regardless of the teaching format, most YIs performed sun salutations and practiced mixed yoga styles. Among the YIs teaching yoga online, 84.6 % expressed their willingness to continue offering online classes post-pandemic and perceived the quality of online yoga teaching as high. Importantly, the number of injuries was low, and there were no significant differences in injury counts between FtoF (3.6 %) and online (4.2 %) teaching formats (p > 0.05). The most common injury in all forms of teaching yoga was a sprain/strain (42.9 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings could inform the development of research studies to examine the long-term feasibility and effectiveness of delivering online yoga since short-term benefits, safety, and YI acceptance appear favorable.</p>","PeriodicalId":50459,"journal":{"name":"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2024.103079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the impact of COVID-19 on the perspectives of yoga instructors (YIs) regarding teaching methodology, class components, and yoga-related injuries among their clients DESIGN: A cross-sectional design in this study.

Setting: A total of 407 YIs from Northeastern United States completed a customized, web-based survey.

Main outcome measures: Chi-square tests were carried out to determine changes in yoga teaching format before and during the pandemic, as well as the counts of yoga related injuries between face-to-face (FtoF) and online teaching format. Independent t tests were used to compare the characteristics of yoga teaching elements.

Results: During the pandemic, 47 % of YIs adopted online teaching, followed by a mixed (45.9 %) format and FtoF (7.1 %) instruction. Both online and FtoF classes showed similar trends, with most reporting class sizes of 4-6, followed by 7-9 and then 1-3 students. Regardless of the teaching format, most YIs performed sun salutations and practiced mixed yoga styles. Among the YIs teaching yoga online, 84.6 % expressed their willingness to continue offering online classes post-pandemic and perceived the quality of online yoga teaching as high. Importantly, the number of injuries was low, and there were no significant differences in injury counts between FtoF (3.6 %) and online (4.2 %) teaching formats (p > 0.05). The most common injury in all forms of teaching yoga was a sprain/strain (42.9 %).

Conclusions: These findings could inform the development of research studies to examine the long-term feasibility and effectiveness of delivering online yoga since short-term benefits, safety, and YI acceptance appear favorable.

了解 COVID-19 对瑜伽教学的影响:研究美国东北部的教学方法、课程内容和受伤模式。
研究目的本研究旨在探讨 COVID-19 对瑜伽教练(YIs)关于教学方法、课程内容以及客户中与瑜伽相关的伤害的看法的影响:来自美国东北部的 407 名瑜伽教练完成了一项定制的网络调查:进行了卡方检验,以确定大流行之前和期间瑜伽教学形式的变化,以及面对面(FtoF)和在线教学形式之间瑜伽相关伤害的计数。独立 t 检验用于比较瑜伽教学元素的特征:大流行期间,47% 的青年采用了在线教学,其次是混合教学(45.9%)和面对面教学(7.1%)。在线课堂和全真课堂呈现出相似的趋势,大多数报告的班级人数为 4-6 人,其次是 7-9 人,然后是 1-3 人。无论采用哪种教学形式,大多数 YI 都做太阳致敬动作,并练习混合瑜伽风格。在网上教授瑜伽的 YIs 中,84.6% 表示愿意在大流行后继续提供网上课程,并认为网上瑜伽教学的质量很高。重要的是,受伤人数较少,家庭式教学(3.6%)和在线教学(4.2%)的受伤人数没有明显差异(P > 0.05)。在所有形式的瑜伽教学中,最常见的损伤是扭伤/拉伤(42.9%):这些研究结果可以为研究开发提供参考,以检查在线瑜伽教学的长期可行性和有效性,因为短期效益、安全性和瑜伽国际接受度似乎都是有利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing
Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
179
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: EXPLORE: The Journal of Science & Healing addresses the scientific principles behind, and applications of, evidence-based healing practices from a wide variety of sources, including conventional, alternative, and cross-cultural medicine. It is an interdisciplinary journal that explores the healing arts, consciousness, spirituality, eco-environmental issues, and basic science as all these fields relate to health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信