Postoperative bleeding outcome of fresh frozen plasma prime in pediatric cardiac surgery: A systematic review & meta-analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Dian Kesumarini, Yunita Widyastuti, Cindy Elfira Boom, Andrea Laurentius, Lucia Kris Dinarti
{"title":"Postoperative bleeding outcome of fresh frozen plasma prime in pediatric cardiac surgery: A systematic review & meta-analysis.","authors":"Dian Kesumarini, Yunita Widyastuti, Cindy Elfira Boom, Andrea Laurentius, Lucia Kris Dinarti","doi":"10.1177/02676591241298822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bleeding after cardiac surgeries holds risk of mortality and morbidity in pediatrics. This systematic review aimed to evaluate postoperative blood loss and blood transfusion requirements for pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) priming.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2024, the search reviewed four databases on randomized trials (RCTs) examining the impact of FFP prime intervention on 24-h postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in pediatric cardiac surgeries. The journals were appraised using <i>Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation</i> checklists, and random effects models estimated the effect size with a 95% confidence interval. Significance and study heterogeneity were indicated by <i>p</i>-values and I<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the screened 2070 articles, one high-quality and four moderate-quality RCTs involving 354 children were identified. No significant reduction in 24-h mean postoperative blood loss was found following FFP priming (mean difference MD: -0.78, 95% CI [-3.3 to 1.75], <i>p</i> = .55) in general pediatric cardiac surgeries. However, subgroup analysis showed significant decrease in blood loss for younger children (<7 months) or those with lower body weight (<6 kg). There was no significant difference between groups in FFP (MD: -0.19, 95% CI [-0.42 to 0.05], <i>p</i> = .13) or red blood cell transfusion (MD: -0.25, 95% CI [-0.51 to 0.02], <i>p</i> = .07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Administering FFP as prime fluid in cardiac surgery did not reduce postoperative bleeding in general pediatric patients, but younger children (<7 months) and those with lower weight (<6 kg) were the subjects who benefited from the FFP priming before surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49707,"journal":{"name":"Perfusion-Uk","volume":" ","pages":"2676591241298822"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfusion-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241298822","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bleeding after cardiac surgeries holds risk of mortality and morbidity in pediatrics. This systematic review aimed to evaluate postoperative blood loss and blood transfusion requirements for pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) priming.

Methods: In 2024, the search reviewed four databases on randomized trials (RCTs) examining the impact of FFP prime intervention on 24-h postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in pediatric cardiac surgeries. The journals were appraised using Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation checklists, and random effects models estimated the effect size with a 95% confidence interval. Significance and study heterogeneity were indicated by p-values and I2.

Results: Of the screened 2070 articles, one high-quality and four moderate-quality RCTs involving 354 children were identified. No significant reduction in 24-h mean postoperative blood loss was found following FFP priming (mean difference MD: -0.78, 95% CI [-3.3 to 1.75], p = .55) in general pediatric cardiac surgeries. However, subgroup analysis showed significant decrease in blood loss for younger children (<7 months) or those with lower body weight (<6 kg). There was no significant difference between groups in FFP (MD: -0.19, 95% CI [-0.42 to 0.05], p = .13) or red blood cell transfusion (MD: -0.25, 95% CI [-0.51 to 0.02], p = .07).

Conclusion: Administering FFP as prime fluid in cardiac surgery did not reduce postoperative bleeding in general pediatric patients, but younger children (<7 months) and those with lower weight (<6 kg) were the subjects who benefited from the FFP priming before surgery.

新鲜冰冻血浆在小儿心脏手术中的术后出血效果:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
导言:心脏手术后出血有可能导致儿科患者死亡和发病。本系统性综述旨在评估接受心脏手术的儿科患者术后失血量和输血需求:方法:检索了 2024 年四个数据库中的随机试验 (RCT),这些试验研究了 FFP 预处理干预对小儿心脏手术术后 24 小时失血量和输血需求的影响。采用推荐等级评估、开发和评价核对表对期刊进行了评估,并使用随机效应模型估算了效应大小和 95% 的置信区间。研究的显著性和异质性由 P 值和 I2 表示:在筛选出的 2070 篇文章中,确定了一项高质量和四项中等质量的 RCT,涉及 354 名儿童。在普通儿科心脏手术中,FFP 引流后术后 24 小时平均失血量没有明显减少(平均差异 MD:-0.78,95% CI [-3.3 至 1.75],p = .55)。然而,亚组分析显示,年龄较小的患儿(p = .13)或输注红细胞(MD:-0.25,95% CI [-0.51 to 0.02],p = .07)的失血量显著减少:结论:在心脏手术中使用 FFP 作为原液并不能减少普通儿科患者的术后出血量,但年龄较小的儿童 (
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perfusion-Uk
Perfusion-Uk 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perfusion is an ISI-ranked, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, which provides current information on all aspects of perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their use in modern cardiac surgery. The journal is at the forefront of international research and development and presents an appropriately multidisciplinary approach to perfusion science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信