Access to affordable daycare and women's mental health in Rajasthan, India: Evidence from a cluster-randomised social intervention.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Arijit Nandi, Parul Agarwal, Anoushaka Chandrashekar, Shannon Maloney, Robin Richardson, Laxmi Thakur, Sam Harper
{"title":"Access to affordable daycare and women's mental health in Rajasthan, India: Evidence from a cluster-randomised social intervention.","authors":"Arijit Nandi, Parul Agarwal, Anoushaka Chandrashekar, Shannon Maloney, Robin Richardson, Laxmi Thakur, Sam Harper","doi":"10.7189/jogh.14.04063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women in India are often responsible for unpaid household work, family caregiving, and paid work, which can contribute to poorer mental health. The provision of childcare has the potential to improve women's mental health, but evidence on the effects of providing access to daycare is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a cluster-randomised trial and used data from a sample of 2858 mothers with age-eligible children from 160 village hamlets in rural Rajasthan, India, to evaluate the impact of providing access to a community-based daycare programme on social and emotional aspects of women's mental health. We conducted a baseline survey in early 2016, randomised hamlets to intervention or control groups approximately six months later, and delivered the final post-intervention survey approximately two years thereafter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment assignment increased the probability that a respondent used a daycare over the two-year follow-up by 40.9 percentage points. Providing randomised access to a daycare resulted in 0.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.1, 0.4) fewer symptoms of mental distress, representing a 9.5% decline compared to the baseline mean of 2.1 symptoms, as well as a 3.7 (95% CI = -0.8, 8.3) percentage point increase in the proportion of women who reported feeling very happy, equivalent to an 11.0% increase relative to the baseline mean of 33.6%. Among social indicators, treatment assignment was associated with a 5.6 (95% CI = -1.2, 12.4) percentage point increase in membership in an association, a relative increase of 43.4% compared to the baseline mean of 12.9%. The intervention did not have an appreciable impact on measures of life satisfaction or trust in institutions. Two-stage least squares instrumental variable analyses showed that daycare use decreased mental distress by 0.4 (95% CI = -0.1, 0.8) symptoms, increased the proportion of women who were very happy by 9.4 (95% CI = 0.0, 17.6) percentage points, and increased membership in an organisation by 15.9 (95% CI = 8.4, 23.7) percentage points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The provision of affordable, community-based daycare was associated with substantial uptake and showed potential for improving mothers' mental health in a rural context where most women were not employed in the formal labour force.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>ISRCTN clinical trial registry (ISRCTN45369145), registered on 16 May 2016; American Economic Association's registry for randomised controlled trials (AEARCTR-0000774), registered on 15 July 2015.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"04063"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women in India are often responsible for unpaid household work, family caregiving, and paid work, which can contribute to poorer mental health. The provision of childcare has the potential to improve women's mental health, but evidence on the effects of providing access to daycare is limited.

Methods: We designed a cluster-randomised trial and used data from a sample of 2858 mothers with age-eligible children from 160 village hamlets in rural Rajasthan, India, to evaluate the impact of providing access to a community-based daycare programme on social and emotional aspects of women's mental health. We conducted a baseline survey in early 2016, randomised hamlets to intervention or control groups approximately six months later, and delivered the final post-intervention survey approximately two years thereafter.

Results: Treatment assignment increased the probability that a respondent used a daycare over the two-year follow-up by 40.9 percentage points. Providing randomised access to a daycare resulted in 0.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.1, 0.4) fewer symptoms of mental distress, representing a 9.5% decline compared to the baseline mean of 2.1 symptoms, as well as a 3.7 (95% CI = -0.8, 8.3) percentage point increase in the proportion of women who reported feeling very happy, equivalent to an 11.0% increase relative to the baseline mean of 33.6%. Among social indicators, treatment assignment was associated with a 5.6 (95% CI = -1.2, 12.4) percentage point increase in membership in an association, a relative increase of 43.4% compared to the baseline mean of 12.9%. The intervention did not have an appreciable impact on measures of life satisfaction or trust in institutions. Two-stage least squares instrumental variable analyses showed that daycare use decreased mental distress by 0.4 (95% CI = -0.1, 0.8) symptoms, increased the proportion of women who were very happy by 9.4 (95% CI = 0.0, 17.6) percentage points, and increased membership in an organisation by 15.9 (95% CI = 8.4, 23.7) percentage points.

Conclusions: The provision of affordable, community-based daycare was associated with substantial uptake and showed potential for improving mothers' mental health in a rural context where most women were not employed in the formal labour force.

Registration: ISRCTN clinical trial registry (ISRCTN45369145), registered on 16 May 2016; American Economic Association's registry for randomised controlled trials (AEARCTR-0000774), registered on 15 July 2015.

印度拉贾斯坦邦负担得起的日托与妇女的心理健康:群组随机社会干预的证据。
背景:印度妇女通常要承担无偿家务劳动、照顾家庭和有偿工作,这可能会导致她们的心理健康状况不佳。提供托儿服务有可能改善妇女的心理健康,但有关提供日托服务效果的证据却很有限:我们设计了一项分组随机试验,并使用了来自印度拉贾斯坦邦农村地区 160 个村庄的 2858 名有适龄儿童的母亲的样本数据,以评估提供社区日托项目对妇女心理健康的社会和情感方面的影响。我们在 2016 年初进行了基线调查,大约六个月后将村庄随机分配到干预组或对照组,并在大约两年后进行了最终的干预后调查:在两年的跟踪调查中,治疗分配使受访者使用日托的概率提高了 40.9 个百分点。随机提供日托服务可使心理困扰症状减少 0.2 个百分点(95% 置信区间 (CI) = -0.1,0.4),与基线平均值 2.1 个症状相比,减少了 9.5%;报告感觉非常幸福的女性比例增加了 3.7 个百分点(95% 置信区间 = -0.8,8.3),与基线平均值 33.6% 相比,增加了 11.0%。在社会指标方面,接受治疗的妇女加入协会的比例增加了 5.6 个百分点(95% CI = -1.2, 12.4),与基线平均值 12.9% 相比,相对增加了 43.4%。干预措施对生活满意度或对机构的信任度没有明显影响。两阶段最小二乘法工具变量分析表明,使用日托服务可将精神痛苦症状减少 0.4 个百分点(95% CI = -0.1,0.8),将非常幸福的女性比例提高 9.4 个百分点(95% CI = 0.0,17.6),将组织成员比例提高 15.9 个百分点(95% CI = 8.4,23.7):结论:在农村地区,大多数妇女都没有正式工作,在这种情况下,提供负担得起的、基于社区的日托服务与大量的接受率有关,并显示出改善母亲心理健康的潜力:ISRCTN临床试验注册表(ISRCTN45369145),2016年5月16日注册;美国经济协会随机对照试验注册表(AEARCTR-0000774),2015年7月15日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信