A Data-Driven Approach to Inguinal Hernia Repairs in Infants and Children.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Zane J Hellmann, Matthew P Shaughnessy, Matthew A Hornick, Robert A Cowles, Daniel G Solomon
{"title":"A Data-Driven Approach to Inguinal Hernia Repairs in Infants and Children.","authors":"Zane J Hellmann, Matthew P Shaughnessy, Matthew A Hornick, Robert A Cowles, Daniel G Solomon","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has become increasingly popular in children. The laparoscopic technique inherently assesses the contralateral processus vaginalis, reducing the risk of metachronous contralateral hernias. We hypothesized that primary laparoscopic repair would be associated with lower rates of subsequent hernia repair in the youngest patients, in whom metachronous contralateral hernias are most common. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> The Pediatric Health Information System database was queried for patients 0-15 years old, who underwent inguinal hernia repair between 2016 and 2022. The primary outcome was the need for subsequent hernia repair. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and ICD-10 procedure codes were used to determine laparoscopic versus open repair. Patients were excluded if the only recorded code was for recurrent hernia or if both laparoscopic and open codes were present for the same procedure. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 109,456 patients were included in the study, with 20,338 patients (18.58%), undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair initially, and 2535 patients (2.32%) requiring a second hernia repair. Patients 6 months old and younger undergoing unilateral laparoscopic repair were less likely to require subsequent surgery (OR 0.82, 95% CI = 0.69-0.96). Across all ages, open bilateral repair less often required subsequent repairs (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.48-2.51). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair decreases the need for subsequent surgical repair in infants 6 months and younger. No difference was detected in older patients. Open repair of bilateral hernias decreases the need for a second hernia operation in all age groups, suggesting that open repair is more durable.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has become increasingly popular in children. The laparoscopic technique inherently assesses the contralateral processus vaginalis, reducing the risk of metachronous contralateral hernias. We hypothesized that primary laparoscopic repair would be associated with lower rates of subsequent hernia repair in the youngest patients, in whom metachronous contralateral hernias are most common. Materials and Methods: The Pediatric Health Information System database was queried for patients 0-15 years old, who underwent inguinal hernia repair between 2016 and 2022. The primary outcome was the need for subsequent hernia repair. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and ICD-10 procedure codes were used to determine laparoscopic versus open repair. Patients were excluded if the only recorded code was for recurrent hernia or if both laparoscopic and open codes were present for the same procedure. Results: A total of 109,456 patients were included in the study, with 20,338 patients (18.58%), undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair initially, and 2535 patients (2.32%) requiring a second hernia repair. Patients 6 months old and younger undergoing unilateral laparoscopic repair were less likely to require subsequent surgery (OR 0.82, 95% CI = 0.69-0.96). Across all ages, open bilateral repair less often required subsequent repairs (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.48-2.51). Conclusion: Laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair decreases the need for subsequent surgical repair in infants 6 months and younger. No difference was detected in older patients. Open repair of bilateral hernias decreases the need for a second hernia operation in all age groups, suggesting that open repair is more durable.

婴幼儿腹股沟疝气修补的数据驱动方法。
简介腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术在儿童中越来越受欢迎。腹腔镜技术本身可评估对侧阴道突,从而降低对侧疝的风险。我们假设,在年龄最小的患者中,初次腹腔镜修补术与较低的后续疝修补率相关,而在这些患者中,并发对侧疝最为常见。材料与方法:在儿科健康信息系统数据库中查询了2016年至2022年期间接受腹股沟疝修补术的0-15岁患者。主要结果是是否需要进行后续疝修补术。当前程序术语(CPT)和 ICD-10 程序代码用于确定腹腔镜修复术与开腹修复术。如果记录的唯一代码是复发性疝气,或同一手术既有腹腔镜代码又有开腹代码,则排除患者。结果:共有 109,456 名患者纳入研究,其中 20,338 名患者(18.58%)首次接受腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术,2535 名患者(2.32%)需要进行第二次疝修补术。接受单侧腹腔镜修复术的 6 个月及以下患者需要再次手术的可能性较低(OR 0.82,95% CI = 0.69-0.96)。在所有年龄段中,接受开放式双侧修复术的患者较少需要进行二次修复(OR 1.93,95% CI 1.48-2.51)。结论腹腔镜单侧腹股沟疝修补术可减少 6 个月及以下婴儿后续手术修补的需求。年龄较大的患者没有发现差异。双侧疝气的开放式修补术可减少所有年龄组患者第二次疝气手术的需求,这表明开放式修补术更耐用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信