The level of electronic health literacy among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Xin Jiang, Lushan Wang, Yingjie Leng, Ruonan Xie, Chengxiang Li, Zhuomiao Nie, Daiqing Liu, Guorong Wang
{"title":"The level of electronic health literacy among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xin Jiang, Lushan Wang, Yingjie Leng, Ruonan Xie, Chengxiang Li, Zhuomiao Nie, Daiqing Liu, Guorong Wang","doi":"10.1186/s13690-024-01428-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of deeper integration of the internet and healthcare services, eHealth literacy levels have become an important predictor of public health outcomes and health-promoting behaviors. However, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding of eHealth literacy levels among older adults.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically assess the level of eHealth literacy among older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Weipu Database (VIP), and Chinese Biomedical Database (Sinomed) to collect survey studies on the eHealth literacy levels of the older adults, with a search timeframe from the establishment of the database to May 2024. The quality of the included literature was assessed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Additionally, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were conducted to detect sources of heterogeneity. Funnel plots and Egger's test were used to assess publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 48 relevant studies were included, including 45 cross-sectional, 2 cohort studies and 1 longitudinal study, comprising 33,919 older adults. The quality of the studies was all above moderate, with 10 high-quality publications. Meta-integration results showed that the eHealth literacy score of older adults was 21.45 (95% CI:19.81-23.08). Subgroup analysis showed that among the elderly population, females had lower eHealth literacy at 19.13 (95% CI:15.83-22.42), those aged 80 years and older had lower eHealth literacy at 16.55 (95% CI:11.73-21.38), and elderly individuals without a spouse and living alone had even lower eHealth literacy at 18.88 (95% CI:15.71-22.04) and 16.03 (95% CI:16.51-21.79). Based on region, eHealth literacy was lower among older adults in developing countries at 20.71 (95% CI:18.95-22.48). Meta-regression results indicate that sample size and region can significantly impact heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results found that the average eHealth literacy score of the elderly was 21.45, which was much lower than the passing level (≥ 32), suggesting that more attention should be paid to the eHealth literacy aspect of the elderly. Meanwhile, due to the limitation of the literature sources, the global representativeness of the results of this study still needs to be supported by more research data from other countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"82 1","pages":"204"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01428-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the context of deeper integration of the internet and healthcare services, eHealth literacy levels have become an important predictor of public health outcomes and health-promoting behaviors. However, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding of eHealth literacy levels among older adults.

Objective: To systematically assess the level of eHealth literacy among older adults.

Methods: We conducted searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Weipu Database (VIP), and Chinese Biomedical Database (Sinomed) to collect survey studies on the eHealth literacy levels of the older adults, with a search timeframe from the establishment of the database to May 2024. The quality of the included literature was assessed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Additionally, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were conducted to detect sources of heterogeneity. Funnel plots and Egger's test were used to assess publication bias.

Results: A total of 48 relevant studies were included, including 45 cross-sectional, 2 cohort studies and 1 longitudinal study, comprising 33,919 older adults. The quality of the studies was all above moderate, with 10 high-quality publications. Meta-integration results showed that the eHealth literacy score of older adults was 21.45 (95% CI:19.81-23.08). Subgroup analysis showed that among the elderly population, females had lower eHealth literacy at 19.13 (95% CI:15.83-22.42), those aged 80 years and older had lower eHealth literacy at 16.55 (95% CI:11.73-21.38), and elderly individuals without a spouse and living alone had even lower eHealth literacy at 18.88 (95% CI:15.71-22.04) and 16.03 (95% CI:16.51-21.79). Based on region, eHealth literacy was lower among older adults in developing countries at 20.71 (95% CI:18.95-22.48). Meta-regression results indicate that sample size and region can significantly impact heterogeneity.

Conclusion: Our results found that the average eHealth literacy score of the elderly was 21.45, which was much lower than the passing level (≥ 32), suggesting that more attention should be paid to the eHealth literacy aspect of the elderly. Meanwhile, due to the limitation of the literature sources, the global representativeness of the results of this study still needs to be supported by more research data from other countries.

老年人的电子健康知识水平:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
背景:在互联网与医疗保健服务深度融合的背景下,电子健康素养水平已成为公共卫生成果和健康促进行为的重要预测指标。然而,人们对老年人的电子健康知识水平缺乏全面了解:系统评估老年人的电子健康知识水平:我们在 MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、CINAHL、PsycINFO、中国国家知识基础设施数据库(CNKI)、万方数据库、维普数据库(VIP)和中国生物医学数据库(Sinomed)中进行检索,收集有关老年人电子健康素养水平的调查研究,检索时限为数据库建立后至 2024 年 5 月。纳入文献的质量采用美国医疗保健研究与质量机构(AHRQ)和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行评估。此外,还进行了亚组分析和元回归以检测异质性来源。漏斗图和 Egger 检验用于评估发表偏倚:共纳入 48 项相关研究,包括 45 项横断面研究、2 项队列研究和 1 项纵向研究,涉及 33 919 名老年人。这些研究的质量都在中等以上,其中有 10 篇高质量论文。元整合结果显示,老年人的电子健康素养得分为 21.45(95% CI:19.81-23.08)。亚组分析显示,在老年人群中,女性的电子健康素养较低,为 19.13(95% CI:15.83-22.42);80 岁及以上老年人的电子健康素养较低,为 16.55(95% CI:11.73-21.38);无配偶独居老年人的电子健康素养更低,为 18.88(95% CI:15.71-22.04)和 16.03(95% CI:16.51-21.79)。根据地区划分,发展中国家老年人的电子健康素养较低,为 20.71(95% CI:18.95-22.48)。元回归结果表明,样本大小和地区会对异质性产生显著影响:我们的研究结果发现,老年人的平均电子健康素养为 21.45 分,远低于合格水平(≥ 32 分),这表明应更加关注老年人的电子健康素养。同时,由于文献来源的限制,本研究结果的全球代表性还需要更多其他国家的研究数据来支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信