Inadequate health literacy and higher healthcare utilisation among older adults in Switzerland: cross-sectional evidence from a population-based study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Giuliano Pigazzini, Maud Wieczorek, Clément Meier, Jürgen Maurer
{"title":"Inadequate health literacy and higher healthcare utilisation among older adults in Switzerland: cross-sectional evidence from a population-based study.","authors":"Giuliano Pigazzini, Maud Wieczorek, Clément Meier, Jürgen Maurer","doi":"10.57187/s.3515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Population ageing in Switzerland poses significant challenges, including for the healthcare system. Inadequate health literacy can hinder individuals' ability to seek appropriate treatments and navigate the healthcare system efficiently. This study explores the associations between health literacy and the number of consultations with general practitioners and healthcare specialists in a population-based sample of adults aged 58+ in Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from 1424 older adults who participated in Wave 8 (2020) of the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). The analysis focuses on two outcomes: the reported number of consultations with (1) general practitioners or (2) healthcare specialists in the year prior to the interview. Health literacy, i.e. the ability to find, understand, assess and apply health information, is measured using the short version of the European Health Literacy Survey questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16). The final health literacy score ranged from 0 to 16 and was categorised into three health literacy levels: inadequate (0-8), problematic (9-12) and sufficient (13-16). Bivariate analyses were conducted using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Partial associations were examined using multivariate generalised Poisson regression models controlling for key sociodemographic, regional and health-related variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 68.5% of the respondents were classified as having sufficient health literacy, while the health literacy level of 23.5% and 7.9% of respondents was classified as problematic or inadequate, respectively. The median number of general practitioner consultations and specialist visits was 2 and 1, respectively, both with an interquartile range of 1. Lower levels of health literacy were statistically significantly associated (p = 0.0011) with a higher number of general practitioner consultations in the year prior to the interview. By contrast, we did not find any significant association between health literacy and the number of specialist consultations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study finds that lower health literacy is associated with higher healthcare utilisation for older adults in Switzerland. The findings may suggest that general practitioners could have a significant role as advisors for individuals with low levels of health literacy, while a similar pattern is not observed for specialists. This discrepancy might be attributed, at least in part, to the role of general practitioners as intermediaries between patients and specialised care providers. Ensuring accessibility to general practitioners, particularly for individuals with low health literacy, could prove to be a beneficial strategy in addressing the healthcare requirements of this particularly vulnerable patient group. Additionally, improving health literacy in the population may provide further health benefits and lead to resource savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":"154 ","pages":"3515"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3515","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Population ageing in Switzerland poses significant challenges, including for the healthcare system. Inadequate health literacy can hinder individuals' ability to seek appropriate treatments and navigate the healthcare system efficiently. This study explores the associations between health literacy and the number of consultations with general practitioners and healthcare specialists in a population-based sample of adults aged 58+ in Switzerland.

Methods: We used data from 1424 older adults who participated in Wave 8 (2020) of the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). The analysis focuses on two outcomes: the reported number of consultations with (1) general practitioners or (2) healthcare specialists in the year prior to the interview. Health literacy, i.e. the ability to find, understand, assess and apply health information, is measured using the short version of the European Health Literacy Survey questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16). The final health literacy score ranged from 0 to 16 and was categorised into three health literacy levels: inadequate (0-8), problematic (9-12) and sufficient (13-16). Bivariate analyses were conducted using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Partial associations were examined using multivariate generalised Poisson regression models controlling for key sociodemographic, regional and health-related variables.

Results: Overall, 68.5% of the respondents were classified as having sufficient health literacy, while the health literacy level of 23.5% and 7.9% of respondents was classified as problematic or inadequate, respectively. The median number of general practitioner consultations and specialist visits was 2 and 1, respectively, both with an interquartile range of 1. Lower levels of health literacy were statistically significantly associated (p = 0.0011) with a higher number of general practitioner consultations in the year prior to the interview. By contrast, we did not find any significant association between health literacy and the number of specialist consultations.

Conclusion: This study finds that lower health literacy is associated with higher healthcare utilisation for older adults in Switzerland. The findings may suggest that general practitioners could have a significant role as advisors for individuals with low levels of health literacy, while a similar pattern is not observed for specialists. This discrepancy might be attributed, at least in part, to the role of general practitioners as intermediaries between patients and specialised care providers. Ensuring accessibility to general practitioners, particularly for individuals with low health literacy, could prove to be a beneficial strategy in addressing the healthcare requirements of this particularly vulnerable patient group. Additionally, improving health literacy in the population may provide further health benefits and lead to resource savings.

瑞士老年人健康知识不足与较高的医疗保健使用率:一项基于人口的研究的横断面证据。
背景和目的:瑞士的人口老龄化带来了巨大的挑战,包括对医疗保健系统的挑战。健康素养不足会妨碍个人寻求适当治疗和有效利用医疗系统的能力。本研究以瑞士 58 岁以上的成年人为样本,探讨了健康素养与向全科医生和医疗专家咨询次数之间的关系:我们使用了 1424 名老年人的数据,他们参加了第八波(2020 年)欧洲健康、老龄和退休调查(SHARE)。分析的重点是两个结果:访谈前一年中报告的(1)全科医生或(2)医疗保健专家的咨询次数。健康素养,即查找、理解、评估和应用健康信息的能力,采用简版欧洲健康素养调查问卷(HLS-EU-Q16)进行测量。最终的健康素养得分从 0 到 16 分不等,分为三个健康素养等级:不足(0-8 分)、有问题(9-12 分)和足够(13-16 分)。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验法进行双变量分析。使用多变量广义泊松回归模型对部分相关性进行了检验,并对主要的社会人口、地区和健康相关变量进行了控制:总体而言,68.5%的受访者被归类为具有足够的健康素养,而23.5%和7.9%的受访者的健康素养水平分别被归类为有问题或不足。受访者健康素养水平较低与受访前一年内全科医生问诊次数较多有显著统计学关联(p = 0.0011)。相比之下,我们没有发现健康素养与专科医生问诊次数之间有任何明显关联:本研究发现,在瑞士,较低的健康素养与老年人较高的医疗保健利用率有关。研究结果可能表明,对于健康素养水平较低的人来说,全科医生可以发挥重要的顾问作用,而对于专科医生来说,却没有发现类似的情况。这种差异至少可以部分归因于全科医生在患者和专科医疗服务提供者之间所扮演的中介角色。确保全科医生的可及性,尤其是对健康素养较低的个人而言,可能会被证明是解决这一特别弱势患者群体医疗保健需求的有益策略。此外,提高民众的健康素养还能带来更多的健康益处,并节省资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信