Cancer survivor preferences on the timing and content of interventions to mitigate financial toxicity associated with cancer treatment.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Maisha R Huq, Marc D Schwartz, Heather Derry-Vick, Amanda Khoudary, Lia Sorgen, Osairys Billini, Thomas S Gunning, Conor Luck, Shreya Kaushik, Vanessa B Hurley, John Marshall, Benjamin A Weinberg, Anteneh Tesfaye, Andrew Ip, Arnold L Potosky, Claire C Conley
{"title":"Cancer survivor preferences on the timing and content of interventions to mitigate financial toxicity associated with cancer treatment.","authors":"Maisha R Huq, Marc D Schwartz, Heather Derry-Vick, Amanda Khoudary, Lia Sorgen, Osairys Billini, Thomas S Gunning, Conor Luck, Shreya Kaushik, Vanessa B Hurley, John Marshall, Benjamin A Weinberg, Anteneh Tesfaye, Andrew Ip, Arnold L Potosky, Claire C Conley","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-08983-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite growing research on financial toxicity among cancer survivors, large gaps remain in understanding how to intervene to minimize financial toxicity. Uptake and efficacy of interventions mitigating cancer financial toxicity, though promising, remain limited and inconsistent. To date, survivor preferences for financial toxicity interventions are underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate survivor preferences for timing and content of a survivor-facing intervention to address financial toxicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult survivors (N = 105) of colorectal cancer (N = 55) or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (N = 50) from three tertiary care centers self-reported demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, mental health, financial impact of cancer (Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity scale), and preferences for intervention timing and content. Chi-square tests examined associations between intervention timing and content preferences with financial toxicity score. ANOVAs and correlation analyses described associations between the number of intervention components survivors endorsed and survivors' characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding intervention timing, 79% of survivors favored intervention before treatment. The most frequently endorsed content was understanding out-of-pocket costs and insurance (48.6%) and applying for aid (39%). Survivors experiencing higher financial toxicity reported greater interest in all intervention components. Survivors with colorectal cancer (p = .018), < 65 years (p = .019), higher financial toxicity (p < .001), greater life-altering (p < .001) and care-altering (p = .014) coping behaviors, and poorer mental health (p = .008) endorsed more intervention components.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Actionable insights to improve financial toxicity interventions may be to offer assistance earlier than currently provided (i.e. before treatment) and to include certain topics currently rarely offered (e.g., stress management, budget development support) in line with survivors' preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"778"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08983-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Despite growing research on financial toxicity among cancer survivors, large gaps remain in understanding how to intervene to minimize financial toxicity. Uptake and efficacy of interventions mitigating cancer financial toxicity, though promising, remain limited and inconsistent. To date, survivor preferences for financial toxicity interventions are underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate survivor preferences for timing and content of a survivor-facing intervention to address financial toxicity.

Methods: Adult survivors (N = 105) of colorectal cancer (N = 55) or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (N = 50) from three tertiary care centers self-reported demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, mental health, financial impact of cancer (Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity scale), and preferences for intervention timing and content. Chi-square tests examined associations between intervention timing and content preferences with financial toxicity score. ANOVAs and correlation analyses described associations between the number of intervention components survivors endorsed and survivors' characteristics.

Results: Regarding intervention timing, 79% of survivors favored intervention before treatment. The most frequently endorsed content was understanding out-of-pocket costs and insurance (48.6%) and applying for aid (39%). Survivors experiencing higher financial toxicity reported greater interest in all intervention components. Survivors with colorectal cancer (p = .018), < 65 years (p = .019), higher financial toxicity (p < .001), greater life-altering (p < .001) and care-altering (p = .014) coping behaviors, and poorer mental health (p = .008) endorsed more intervention components.

Conclusions: Actionable insights to improve financial toxicity interventions may be to offer assistance earlier than currently provided (i.e. before treatment) and to include certain topics currently rarely offered (e.g., stress management, budget development support) in line with survivors' preferences.

癌症幸存者对减轻与癌症治疗相关的经济毒性的干预措施的时间和内容的偏好。
目的:尽管有关癌症幸存者财务毒性的研究日益增多,但在了解如何进行干预以最大限度地减少财务毒性方面仍存在巨大差距。尽管减轻癌症财务毒性的干预措施很有前景,但其接受度和效果仍然有限且不一致。迄今为止,幸存者对财务毒性干预措施的偏好尚未得到充分探索。本研究旨在评估幸存者对面向幸存者的财务毒性干预措施的时间和内容的偏好:来自三个三级医疗中心的结直肠癌(55 人)或非霍奇金淋巴瘤(50 人)成年幸存者(105 人)自我报告了人口统计学和临床特征、合并症、心理健康、癌症的经济影响(经济毒性综合评分量表)以及对干预时机和内容的偏好。卡方检验检验了干预时间和内容偏好与财务毒性评分之间的关联。方差分析和相关分析描述了幸存者认可的干预内容数量与幸存者特征之间的关系:关于干预时机,79% 的幸存者倾向于在治疗前进行干预。最常认可的内容是了解自付费用和保险(48.6%)以及申请援助(39%)。财务毒性较高的幸存者对所有干预内容都表现出更大的兴趣。结直肠癌幸存者(p = .018),结论:改善财务毒性干预的可行方法可能是比目前提供的援助更早(即在治疗前)提供援助,并根据幸存者的偏好纳入目前很少提供的某些主题(如压力管理、预算编制支持)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信