Argen Omurzakov, Sanjeev Rampam, Marcos R. Gonzalez, Santiago A. Lozano-Calderon
{"title":"What is the incidence and non-union rate of radiation-associated fractures? – A systematic review of the literature","authors":"Argen Omurzakov, Sanjeev Rampam, Marcos R. Gonzalez, Santiago A. Lozano-Calderon","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Radiation-associated fractures (RAFs) are a challenging complication in oncologic patients, yet their incidence remains unknown and optimal management lacks consensus.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This review aimed to evaluate the incidence of RAFs in the trunk, pelvis, and extremities as well as non-union rates of surgical and non-surgical treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A systematic review of PubMed and Embase databases was conducted. The study was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024513017). Studies were included if they reported RAFs in oncologic populations, had a sample size of at least five patients, and provided extractable data on RAF incidence or number. The STROBE checklist was utilized for evaluation of study quality. For eligible studies, quantitative analyses were conducted to determine weighted incidence of RAF and fracture non-union.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-five studies comprising 9,980 patients treated with radiation therapy were included. The weighted incidence of RAFs was calculated to be 6.5% across 8,061 patients. The weighted incidence of femoral RAF was 5.2%, while pelvic RAF incidence was 17.1%. Non-union rates after initial treatment varied from 4% to 100%, with an overall weighted incidence of 48%. Treatments included intramedullary nailing, fixation with screws/plate, prosthetic replacement, conservative treatment, and amputation, with varying success rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review highlights RAFs as a significant complication of radiation therapy, with a weighted incidence of 6.5% and a non-union rate of 48%. Advanced radiation techniques have reduced RAF occurrences, but non-union remains a challenge, necessitating tailored treatment strategies. Further research is needed to optimize RAF management and improve patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 110617"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024042798","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Radiation-associated fractures (RAFs) are a challenging complication in oncologic patients, yet their incidence remains unknown and optimal management lacks consensus.
Aim
This review aimed to evaluate the incidence of RAFs in the trunk, pelvis, and extremities as well as non-union rates of surgical and non-surgical treatment.
Materials and methods
A systematic review of PubMed and Embase databases was conducted. The study was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024513017). Studies were included if they reported RAFs in oncologic populations, had a sample size of at least five patients, and provided extractable data on RAF incidence or number. The STROBE checklist was utilized for evaluation of study quality. For eligible studies, quantitative analyses were conducted to determine weighted incidence of RAF and fracture non-union.
Results
Thirty-five studies comprising 9,980 patients treated with radiation therapy were included. The weighted incidence of RAFs was calculated to be 6.5% across 8,061 patients. The weighted incidence of femoral RAF was 5.2%, while pelvic RAF incidence was 17.1%. Non-union rates after initial treatment varied from 4% to 100%, with an overall weighted incidence of 48%. Treatments included intramedullary nailing, fixation with screws/plate, prosthetic replacement, conservative treatment, and amputation, with varying success rates.
Conclusion
This review highlights RAFs as a significant complication of radiation therapy, with a weighted incidence of 6.5% and a non-union rate of 48%. Advanced radiation techniques have reduced RAF occurrences, but non-union remains a challenge, necessitating tailored treatment strategies. Further research is needed to optimize RAF management and improve patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.