Prospective stability of memory for peritraumatic dissociation and anxiety: Replication and extension examining PTSD treatment modality and response.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Gabrielle M Gauthier, Emma K PeConga, Jenna L Mohr, Norah C Feeny, Lori A Zoellner
{"title":"Prospective stability of memory for peritraumatic dissociation and anxiety: Replication and extension examining PTSD treatment modality and response.","authors":"Gabrielle M Gauthier, Emma K PeConga, Jenna L Mohr, Norah C Feeny, Lori A Zoellner","doi":"10.1037/tra0001790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Retrospective memory for peritraumatic reactions occurring during or immediately after trauma exposure may decrease in intensity for some over treatment. This may be due to psychotherapy-specific memory processes, such as repeated accessing of the trauma memory. Additionally, it may be that recovery drives changes in memory for these experiences. Critical to examining these hypotheses is an effective control treatment that reduces symptoms but does not directly involve repeated retrieval of the trauma memory, such as pharmacotherapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a sample of 200 individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder, retrospective memory for dissociation and anxiety occurring around the index traumatic event (Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire, Marmar et al., 1997; Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire, Cardeña et al., 2000) was assessed before and after treatment in a randomized clinical trial (NCT00127673) comparing prolonged exposure and sertraline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported that their memory for dissociation and anxiety at the time of the trauma was less intense at posttreatment (<i>d</i> = 0.26-0.64). There was no difference between prolonged exposure and sertraline on these memory indices. However, treatment responders, using a clinically meaningful change cutoff score, remembered their reactions at the time of the trauma as less dissociative (<i>d</i> = 0.66) and less anxious (<i>d</i> = 1.19) at posttreatment than nonresponders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Retrospective memory for the intensity of reactions experienced at the time of the traumatic event decreased from pre- to posttreatment, with effects most pronounced for those who made clinically meaningful gains in treatment. Inclusion of a nonpsychotherapy intervention control argues that recovery processes may explain these shifts and point to potential mood-dependent memory effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001790","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Retrospective memory for peritraumatic reactions occurring during or immediately after trauma exposure may decrease in intensity for some over treatment. This may be due to psychotherapy-specific memory processes, such as repeated accessing of the trauma memory. Additionally, it may be that recovery drives changes in memory for these experiences. Critical to examining these hypotheses is an effective control treatment that reduces symptoms but does not directly involve repeated retrieval of the trauma memory, such as pharmacotherapy.

Method: In a sample of 200 individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder, retrospective memory for dissociation and anxiety occurring around the index traumatic event (Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire, Marmar et al., 1997; Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire, Cardeña et al., 2000) was assessed before and after treatment in a randomized clinical trial (NCT00127673) comparing prolonged exposure and sertraline.

Results: Participants reported that their memory for dissociation and anxiety at the time of the trauma was less intense at posttreatment (d = 0.26-0.64). There was no difference between prolonged exposure and sertraline on these memory indices. However, treatment responders, using a clinically meaningful change cutoff score, remembered their reactions at the time of the trauma as less dissociative (d = 0.66) and less anxious (d = 1.19) at posttreatment than nonresponders.

Conclusions: Retrospective memory for the intensity of reactions experienced at the time of the traumatic event decreased from pre- to posttreatment, with effects most pronounced for those who made clinically meaningful gains in treatment. Inclusion of a nonpsychotherapy intervention control argues that recovery processes may explain these shifts and point to potential mood-dependent memory effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

创伤周围解离和焦虑记忆的前瞻性稳定性:创伤后应激障碍治疗模式和反应的复制和扩展研究。
目的:一些人对创伤暴露期间或紧接创伤暴露之后发生的创伤周围反应的回溯记忆可能会随着治疗的进行而降低强度。这可能是由于心理治疗特有的记忆过程造成的,例如反复访问创伤记忆。此外,也可能是康复促使这些经历的记忆发生了变化。研究这些假设的关键在于一种有效的控制治疗,这种治疗可以减轻症状,但不直接涉及反复检索创伤记忆,例如药物治疗:方法:在一项随机临床试验(NCT00127673)中,以 200 名创伤后应激障碍患者为样本,评估他们在治疗前后对创伤事件前后发生的分离和焦虑的回溯记忆(创伤性分离体验问卷,Marmar 等人,1997 年;斯坦福急性应激反应问卷,Cardeña 等人,2000 年):结果:受试者表示,在治疗后,他们对创伤时分离和焦虑的记忆强度降低了(d = 0.26-0.64)。在这些记忆指数上,长期暴露和舍曲林之间没有差异。然而,采用有临床意义的变化临界值,治疗应答者在治疗后回忆起创伤发生时的反应时,其分离性(d = 0.66)和焦虑性(d = 1.19)均低于非应答者:结论:从治疗前到治疗后,对创伤事件发生时的反应强度的回溯记忆有所下降,对那些在治疗中取得了有临床意义的疗效的人来说,效果最为明显。将非心理治疗干预对照纳入其中,可以解释这些变化的恢复过程,并指出潜在的情绪依赖性记忆效应。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信