Agreement of PROMIS Preference (PROPr) scores generated from the PROMIS-29 + 2 and the PROMIS-16.

IF 3.3 3区医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

Quality of Life Research Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1007/s11136-024-03827-5

Janel Hanmer, Chengbo Zeng, Amy M Cizik, Jason H Raad, Joel Tsevat, Anthony Rodriguez, Ron D Hays, Maria Orlando Edelen

{"title":"Agreement of PROMIS Preference (PROPr) scores generated from the PROMIS-29 + 2 and the PROMIS-16.","authors":"Janel Hanmer, Chengbo Zeng, Amy M Cizik, Jason H Raad, Joel Tsevat, Anthony Rodriguez, Ron D Hays, Maria Orlando Edelen","doi":"10.1007/s11136-024-03827-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Preference-based summary scores are used to quantify values, differences, and changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that can be used for cost-effectiveness analyses. The PROMIS-Preference (PROPr) measure is a preference-based summary score comprised of 7 PROMIS domains. The PROMIS-16 is a new PROMIS profile instrument. We evaluated the measurement properties of PROPr generated from the widely used PROMIS-29 + 2 compared with the PROMIS-16.Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of data from an online survey of the general US population, with a longitudinal subsample who reported back pain. The survey included both the PROMIS-16 and the PROMIS-29 + 2 profiles. PROPr scores were calculated from each profile and compared by the distribution of scores, overall mean scores, product-moment correlations with pain measure scores (Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Pain Intensity, Interference with Enjoyment of Life, Interference with General Activity Scale, and Graded Chronic Pain Scale), and difference in mean scores in subgroups with 13 chronic health conditions (Cohen's d).Results: Of the 4,115 participants in the baseline survey, 1,533 with any reported back pain were invited for the 6-month follow-up survey and 1,256 completed it. At baseline, the overall mean (SD) PROPr score was 0.532 (0.240) from PROMIS-16 and 0.535 (0.250) from PROMIS 29 + 2. At both time points, the correlations of PROPr scores with physical and mental health summary scores from the PROMIS-29 and 4 pain scales were within 0.01 between profiles. Using subgroups with chronic health conditions and comparing between profiles, Cohen's d estimates of the difference in effect size were small (< 0.2).Conclusion: PROPr scores from the 16-item PROMIS profile measure are similar to PROPr scores from the longer PROMIS-29 + 2.","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03827-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Preference-based summary scores are used to quantify values, differences, and changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that can be used for cost-effectiveness analyses. The PROMIS-Preference (PROPr) measure is a preference-based summary score comprised of 7 PROMIS domains. The PROMIS-16 is a new PROMIS profile instrument. We evaluated the measurement properties of PROPr generated from the widely used PROMIS-29 + 2 compared with the PROMIS-16.

Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of data from an online survey of the general US population, with a longitudinal subsample who reported back pain. The survey included both the PROMIS-16 and the PROMIS-29 + 2 profiles. PROPr scores were calculated from each profile and compared by the distribution of scores, overall mean scores, product-moment correlations with pain measure scores (Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Pain Intensity, Interference with Enjoyment of Life, Interference with General Activity Scale, and Graded Chronic Pain Scale), and difference in mean scores in subgroups with 13 chronic health conditions (Cohen's d).

Results: Of the 4,115 participants in the baseline survey, 1,533 with any reported back pain were invited for the 6-month follow-up survey and 1,256 completed it. At baseline, the overall mean (SD) PROPr score was 0.532 (0.240) from PROMIS-16 and 0.535 (0.250) from PROMIS 29 + 2. At both time points, the correlations of PROPr scores with physical and mental health summary scores from the PROMIS-29 and 4 pain scales were within 0.01 between profiles. Using subgroups with chronic health conditions and comparing between profiles, Cohen's d estimates of the difference in effect size were small (< 0.2).

Conclusion: PROPr scores from the 16-item PROMIS profile measure are similar to PROPr scores from the longer PROMIS-29 + 2.

查看原文本刊更多论文

PROMIS-29 + 2 和 PROMIS-16 得出的 PROMIS 偏好 (PROPr) 分数的一致性。

目的：基于偏好的综合评分用于量化健康相关生活质量 (HRQoL) 的价值、差异和变化，可用于成本效益分析。PROMIS-偏好（PROPr）测量是一种基于偏好的综合评分，由 7 个 PROMIS 领域组成。PROMIS-16 是一种新的 PROMIS 资料工具。与 PROMIS-16 相比，我们评估了由广泛使用的 PROMIS-29 + 2 生成的 PROPr 的测量属性：我们对来自美国普通人群在线调查的数据进行了二次分析，并对报告背痛的子样本进行了纵向分析。该调查包括 PROMIS-16 和 PROMIS-29 + 2 两项资料。根据每份问卷计算出 PROPr 分数，并通过分数分布、总体平均分数、与疼痛测量分数（Oswestry 残疾指数、Roland-Morris 残疾问卷、疼痛强度、对享受生活的干扰、对一般活动的干扰量表和慢性疼痛分级量表）的乘积矩相关性以及 13 种慢性健康状况（Cohen's d）亚组平均分数的差异进行比较：在基线调查的 4,115 名参与者中，1,533 名曾报告过背痛的人受邀参加了为期 6 个月的跟踪调查，其中 1,256 人完成了调查。基线时，PROMIS-16 和 PROMIS 29 + 2 的 PROPr 总平均值（标度）分别为 0.532 (0.240)和 0.535 (0.250)。在这两个时间点上，PROPr 分数与 PROMIS-29 的身心健康总分和 4 个疼痛量表之间的相关性都在 0.01 以内。通过对有慢性病的亚组进行比较和对不同量表进行比较，Cohen's d 估计的效应大小差异很小（结论：16项PROMIS概况测量的PROPr得分与较长的PROMIS-29 + 2的PROPr得分相似。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore

6.50

自引率

8.60%

发文量

224

审稿时长

3-8 weeks

期刊介绍： Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.