Pain Control after Otologic Surgery: Do Nonopioid Analgesics Suffice?

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mustafa G Bulbul, Zulkifl Jafary, Brian M Kellermeyer, Scott B Shapiro
{"title":"Pain Control after Otologic Surgery: Do Nonopioid Analgesics Suffice?","authors":"Mustafa G Bulbul, Zulkifl Jafary, Brian M Kellermeyer, Scott B Shapiro","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Investigate whether nonopioid analgesics (NOA) provide adequate pain control after otologic surgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective multicenter cohort.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two quaternary academic medical centers.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients over 12 years old who underwent otologic surgery involving the middle ear and/or mastoid at two centers over a 5-month period.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were prescribed acetaminophen and ibuprofen postoperatively and instructed to contact the surgical team if pain control was inadequate, in which case an opioid medication was prescribed. Level of pain and medication use were assessed with a standardized questionnaire, 1 week after surgery.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Postoperative pain levels during the first week after surgery (0-10); proportion of patients requiring opioid medication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-seven patients were included. Of these, 37% underwent tympanomastoidectomy, 27% cochlear implant, 19.5% postauricular tympanoplasty, 10.5% transcanal tympanoplasty, and 6% had a different surgery. The median of the average level of pain in the first 7 days was 5/10 (IQR 3-6). The median highest level of pain was 5 (IQR 4-8). The median current level of pain was 3 (IQR 1-5). Seven patients (10%) required breakthrough opioid pain medication. The remaining 90% utilized NOA only. One week after surgery, 60% were taking nonopioid analgesics only while the remaining 40% were not taking any pain medication at all. Although opioids were required infrequently, there were no significant differences in medication use between the two centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NOA provide adequate pain control for most patients after middle ear and mastoid otologic surgery. Opioid analgesics do not routinely need to be prescribed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":"45 10","pages":"1143-1147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Investigate whether nonopioid analgesics (NOA) provide adequate pain control after otologic surgery.

Study design: Retrospective multicenter cohort.

Setting: Two quaternary academic medical centers.

Patients: Patients over 12 years old who underwent otologic surgery involving the middle ear and/or mastoid at two centers over a 5-month period.

Interventions: Patients were prescribed acetaminophen and ibuprofen postoperatively and instructed to contact the surgical team if pain control was inadequate, in which case an opioid medication was prescribed. Level of pain and medication use were assessed with a standardized questionnaire, 1 week after surgery.

Main outcome measures: Postoperative pain levels during the first week after surgery (0-10); proportion of patients requiring opioid medication.

Results: Sixty-seven patients were included. Of these, 37% underwent tympanomastoidectomy, 27% cochlear implant, 19.5% postauricular tympanoplasty, 10.5% transcanal tympanoplasty, and 6% had a different surgery. The median of the average level of pain in the first 7 days was 5/10 (IQR 3-6). The median highest level of pain was 5 (IQR 4-8). The median current level of pain was 3 (IQR 1-5). Seven patients (10%) required breakthrough opioid pain medication. The remaining 90% utilized NOA only. One week after surgery, 60% were taking nonopioid analgesics only while the remaining 40% were not taking any pain medication at all. Although opioids were required infrequently, there were no significant differences in medication use between the two centers.

Conclusions: NOA provide adequate pain control for most patients after middle ear and mastoid otologic surgery. Opioid analgesics do not routinely need to be prescribed.

耳科手术后的疼痛控制:非阿片类镇痛药是否足够?
研究目的研究设计:回顾性多中心队列研究:回顾性多中心队列:两所四级学术医疗中心:患者:12 岁以上、在两个中心接受耳科手术(涉及中耳和/或乳突)的患者,为期 5 个月:术后为患者开具对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬处方,并指导患者在疼痛控制不佳时与手术团队联系,在这种情况下开具阿片类药物处方。术后一周,通过标准化问卷对疼痛程度和药物使用情况进行评估:术后第一周的疼痛程度(0-10);需要阿片类药物的患者比例:结果:共纳入 67 名患者。其中,37%的患者接受了鼓室成形术,27%的患者接受了人工耳蜗植入术,19.5%的患者接受了耳后鼓室成形术,10.5%的患者接受了经鼓室鼓室成形术,6%的患者接受了其他手术。头七天平均疼痛程度的中位数为 5/10(IQR 3-6)。最高疼痛程度的中位数为 5(IQR 4-8)。目前疼痛程度的中位数为 3(IQR 1-5)。七名患者(10%)需要使用突破性阿片类止痛药物。其余 90% 的患者仅使用了 NOA。术后一周,60%的患者只服用非阿片类镇痛药,其余 40% 的患者则完全没有服用任何镇痛药。虽然需要阿片类药物的次数不多,但两个中心在药物使用方面没有明显差异:结论:对于大多数中耳和乳突耳科手术后的患者来说,无痛镇痛可提供充分的疼痛控制。结论:NOA 可为大多数中耳和乳突耳科手术后的患者提供充分的止痛效果,无需常规使用阿片类镇痛药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信