Maria Ivan, Heba Mahdy, Amrita Banerjee, Amos Tetteh, Natalie Greenwold, Davide Casagrandi, Davor Jurkovic, Raffaele Napolitano, Anna L David
{"title":"Three-Dimensional Volume Ultrasound Assessment of Cesarean Scar Niche and Cervix in Pregnant Women: A Reproducibility Study.","authors":"Maria Ivan, Heba Mahdy, Amrita Banerjee, Amos Tetteh, Natalie Greenwold, Davide Casagrandi, Davor Jurkovic, Raffaele Napolitano, Anna L David","doi":"10.1002/jum.16613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the reproducibility of standardized 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasound volume analysis of the dimensions and the position of cesarean birth (CB) scar niche relative to the cervix in pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective single-center study in women with 1 previous CB ≥8 cm cervical dilatation acquired ultrasound volumes between 11 and 24 weeks' gestation in a mid-sagittal plane. Two experienced operators processed the volumes using virtual organ computer-aided analysis. A CB scar niche was defined as an indentation at the scar site of ≥2 mm in depth. Niche and cervix volumes were calculated using manual contouring. Agreement for categorical variables was expressed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Bland-Altman method was used to assess numerical variable reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To achieve the desired statistical power, 52 participants were included. The intraobserver agreement on niche classification relative to the internal os was 100%, with an interobserver kappa coefficient of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-0.99, P < .05). The intraobserver ICC for niche volume was 0.94 (95% CI 0.90-0.96; P < .001), with a mean difference of -15.32 mm<sup>3</sup> (±109.32). The interobserver ICC was 0.78 (95% CI 0.62-0.87; P < .001), with a mean difference of -21.57 mm<sup>3</sup> (±202.01). The ICC for niche/cervix volume ratio were 0.94 (95% CI 0.90-0.96; P < .001) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.63-0.87; P < .001) for intra- and interobserver reproducibility, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that 3D CB scar sonographic features are highly reproducible in pregnant women with a history of advanced labor CB. The validated protocol can guide future research on the association with subsequent adverse pregnancy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16613","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess the reproducibility of standardized 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasound volume analysis of the dimensions and the position of cesarean birth (CB) scar niche relative to the cervix in pregnant women.
Methods: This prospective single-center study in women with 1 previous CB ≥8 cm cervical dilatation acquired ultrasound volumes between 11 and 24 weeks' gestation in a mid-sagittal plane. Two experienced operators processed the volumes using virtual organ computer-aided analysis. A CB scar niche was defined as an indentation at the scar site of ≥2 mm in depth. Niche and cervix volumes were calculated using manual contouring. Agreement for categorical variables was expressed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Bland-Altman method was used to assess numerical variable reproducibility.
Results: To achieve the desired statistical power, 52 participants were included. The intraobserver agreement on niche classification relative to the internal os was 100%, with an interobserver kappa coefficient of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-0.99, P < .05). The intraobserver ICC for niche volume was 0.94 (95% CI 0.90-0.96; P < .001), with a mean difference of -15.32 mm3 (±109.32). The interobserver ICC was 0.78 (95% CI 0.62-0.87; P < .001), with a mean difference of -21.57 mm3 (±202.01). The ICC for niche/cervix volume ratio were 0.94 (95% CI 0.90-0.96; P < .001) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.63-0.87; P < .001) for intra- and interobserver reproducibility, respectively.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates that 3D CB scar sonographic features are highly reproducible in pregnant women with a history of advanced labor CB. The validated protocol can guide future research on the association with subsequent adverse pregnancy outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community.
Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to:
-Basic Science-
Breast Ultrasound-
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-
Dermatology-
Echocardiography-
Elastography-
Emergency Medicine-
Fetal Echocardiography-
Gastrointestinal Ultrasound-
General and Abdominal Ultrasound-
Genitourinary Ultrasound-
Gynecologic Ultrasound-
Head and Neck Ultrasound-
High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging-
Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound-
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound-
Neurosonology-
Obstetric Ultrasound-
Ophthalmologic Ultrasound-
Pediatric Ultrasound-
Point-of-Care Ultrasound-
Public Policy-
Superficial Structures-
Therapeutic Ultrasound-
Ultrasound Education-
Ultrasound in Global Health-
Urologic Ultrasound-
Vascular Ultrasound