Effect duration of a self-applied talocrural joint mobilization on restricted dorsiflexion: a repeated measures design.

IF 1.6 Q2 REHABILITATION
Camryn A Yacks, Ceili M Y Kacmarcik, Carly A Archambeau, Joaquin A Barrios
{"title":"Effect duration of a self-applied talocrural joint mobilization on restricted dorsiflexion: a repeated measures design.","authors":"Camryn A Yacks, Ceili M Y Kacmarcik, Carly A Archambeau, Joaquin A Barrios","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2024.2424545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to determine the effect duration of a talocrural mobilization on individuals with restricted dorsiflexion during a static weight bearing lunge test (WBLT) and dynamic 3D motion capture-based peak ankle dorsiflexion during a forward step down (FSD) task. Secondarily, we aimed to correlate any immediate changes in ankle mobility with concurrent changes in proximal joint kinematics during the FSD post-mobilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-six individuals were screened for dorsiflexion restriction, of which 26 (15 females, 22.3 ± 2.2 years old, body mass index 25.2 ± 2.9 kg/m2) qualified with a WBLT of ≤ 35° on at least one limb. A baseline WBLT measure and 3D motion capture of 5 consecutive FSD repetitions on a 6-inch box were obtained. Participants then viewed an instructional video of a talocrural joint self-mobilization using a resistance band. WBLT and FSD were collected again immediately post-mobilization and at 5-min intervals for 60 min or until the WBLT returned to baseline for 2 consecutive measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WBLT dorsiflexion showed a mean increase of 6.5 degrees (<i>p</i> < 0.001) post-mobilization. The effect faded over time and no longer differed from baseline 25 min post-mobilization (<i>p</i> = 0.964). Dynamic peak ankle dorsiflexion did not change post-mobilization at any time point (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.546). No 3D kinematic time-course changes were observed at the hip or knee. However, immediate raw alterations in dorsiflexion correlated with alterations for hip and knee flexion.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>A talocrural joint mobilization increased static dorsiflexion per the WBLT for a 20-25-min period with regression to baseline. However, increased dynamic ankle dorsiflexion was not observed during the FSD task. Improved mobility alone does not appear to change movement patterns. Clinicians should be aware of both effect duration and the potential need for task-specific training to better facilitate dynamic utilization of increased mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2024.2424545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to determine the effect duration of a talocrural mobilization on individuals with restricted dorsiflexion during a static weight bearing lunge test (WBLT) and dynamic 3D motion capture-based peak ankle dorsiflexion during a forward step down (FSD) task. Secondarily, we aimed to correlate any immediate changes in ankle mobility with concurrent changes in proximal joint kinematics during the FSD post-mobilization.

Methods: Seventy-six individuals were screened for dorsiflexion restriction, of which 26 (15 females, 22.3 ± 2.2 years old, body mass index 25.2 ± 2.9 kg/m2) qualified with a WBLT of ≤ 35° on at least one limb. A baseline WBLT measure and 3D motion capture of 5 consecutive FSD repetitions on a 6-inch box were obtained. Participants then viewed an instructional video of a talocrural joint self-mobilization using a resistance band. WBLT and FSD were collected again immediately post-mobilization and at 5-min intervals for 60 min or until the WBLT returned to baseline for 2 consecutive measures.

Results: WBLT dorsiflexion showed a mean increase of 6.5 degrees (p < 0.001) post-mobilization. The effect faded over time and no longer differed from baseline 25 min post-mobilization (p = 0.964). Dynamic peak ankle dorsiflexion did not change post-mobilization at any time point (p ≥ 0.546). No 3D kinematic time-course changes were observed at the hip or knee. However, immediate raw alterations in dorsiflexion correlated with alterations for hip and knee flexion.

Discussion/conclusion: A talocrural joint mobilization increased static dorsiflexion per the WBLT for a 20-25-min period with regression to baseline. However, increased dynamic ankle dorsiflexion was not observed during the FSD task. Improved mobility alone does not appear to change movement patterns. Clinicians should be aware of both effect duration and the potential need for task-specific training to better facilitate dynamic utilization of increased mobility.

自我应用距骨关节活动对受限背伸的影响持续时间:重复测量设计。
研究目的我们的目的是确定在静态负重跳跃测试(WBLT)和基于动态三维运动捕捉的前向下跨步(FSD)任务中,足外翻受限的个体在足外翻活动持续时间上的影响。其次,我们的目标是将踝关节活动度的即时变化与动员后 FSD 期间近端关节运动学的同期变化联系起来:对 76 人进行了背屈受限筛查,其中 26 人(15 名女性,22.3 ± 2.2 岁,体重指数 25.2 ± 2.9 kg/m2)至少有一侧肢体的 WBLT ≤ 35°。在一个 6 英寸的盒子上进行基线 WBLT 测量和连续 5 次 FSD 重复的 3D 运动捕捉。然后,参与者观看了一段使用阻力带进行距骨关节自我活动的教学视频。活动后立即再次采集 WBLT 和 FSD,并在 60 分钟内每隔 5 分钟采集一次,或连续采集 2 次,直到 WBLT 恢复到基线为止:结果:WBLT 背屈平均增加了 6.5 度(P = 0.964)。动态踝关节背屈峰值在动员后的任何时间点均无变化(p ≥ 0.546)。在髋关节或膝关节处未观察到三维运动学时程变化。然而,背屈的即时原始变化与髋关节和膝关节屈曲的变化相关:讨论/结论:根据WBLT,在20-25分钟的时间内,距骨关节活动可增加静态背伸,然后恢复到基线。然而,在FSD任务中并未观察到动态踝关节背屈的增加。单纯的活动度改善似乎并不能改变运动模式。临床医生应注意效果持续时间和特定任务训练的潜在需求,以更好地促进动态利用增加的活动度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信