Khushboo S Patel, Judith H Danovitch, Nicholaus S Noles
{"title":"Children's beliefs about Black and White men's and women's scientific knowledge: An intersectional approach.","authors":"Khushboo S Patel, Judith H Danovitch, Nicholaus S Noles","doi":"10.1037/dev0001854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children are sensitive to other's knowledge and social characteristics when seeking out information, but little is known about how adults' gender and race interact to influence children's beliefs about adults' knowledge. In two studies, 5-8-year-olds (<i>N</i> = 257; 127 girls; 130 boys; 73% White) saw photos of Black and White men and women and rated each adults' science knowledge. In Study 1, children then viewed four adult faces together (one from each gender and race) and chose who knew the most and second-most about the answer to a scientific question. In Study 2, the selection task was modified so that children saw two faces from different categories and chose one, and children were then asked to identify one of four individuals as a scientist. In both studies, children also chose which of four individuals they would want to learn about science from. Children gave similar knowledge ratings to men and women and to Black and White individuals when they rated one adult at a time. However, when children selected the most knowledgeable adult, they showed an ingroup gender-based preference whose strength varied with child age. In both studies, children also showed an ingroup gender-based learning preference, but showed no preferences based on adult race. Children referred to adults' appearance most often when justifying their learning preference and which individual they believed to be a scientist. Together, these findings suggest that, for primarily White American children, a potential adult informant's gender may be more salient than race when evaluating science knowledge. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001854","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Children are sensitive to other's knowledge and social characteristics when seeking out information, but little is known about how adults' gender and race interact to influence children's beliefs about adults' knowledge. In two studies, 5-8-year-olds (N = 257; 127 girls; 130 boys; 73% White) saw photos of Black and White men and women and rated each adults' science knowledge. In Study 1, children then viewed four adult faces together (one from each gender and race) and chose who knew the most and second-most about the answer to a scientific question. In Study 2, the selection task was modified so that children saw two faces from different categories and chose one, and children were then asked to identify one of four individuals as a scientist. In both studies, children also chose which of four individuals they would want to learn about science from. Children gave similar knowledge ratings to men and women and to Black and White individuals when they rated one adult at a time. However, when children selected the most knowledgeable adult, they showed an ingroup gender-based preference whose strength varied with child age. In both studies, children also showed an ingroup gender-based learning preference, but showed no preferences based on adult race. Children referred to adults' appearance most often when justifying their learning preference and which individual they believed to be a scientist. Together, these findings suggest that, for primarily White American children, a potential adult informant's gender may be more salient than race when evaluating science knowledge. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.