Addition of long-acting beta-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids for asthma in preschool children: A systematic review.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Dominika Ambrożej, Maja Cieślik, Wojciech Feleszko, Carlos E Rodriguez-Martinez, Jose A Castro-Rodriguez
{"title":"Addition of long-acting beta-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids for asthma in preschool children: A systematic review.","authors":"Dominika Ambrożej, Maja Cieślik, Wojciech Feleszko, Carlos E Rodriguez-Martinez, Jose A Castro-Rodriguez","doi":"10.1016/j.prrv.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) are essential in asthma management, but the guidelines for treatment in preschool children remain heterogeneous worldwide. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of LABA + ICS therapy in asthmatic children under six years. We searched four databases, identifying six eligible studies (n = 1415 preschoolers), and in all the LABA used was salmeterol. Due to high heterogeneity, quantitative analysis was not feasible. Three before-and-after studies demonstrated significant reductions in unscheduled visits and hospitalizations due to asthma exacerbations with LABA + ICS. One RCT showed fewer exacerbations in the LABA + ICS group compared to ICS alone. Night-time awakenings decreased significantly in two studies but not in one RCT. Improvements in lung function using impulse oscillometry and FeNO levels were noted with LABA+ICS in one RCT. No significant adverse effects were reported. Despite positive findings, high-quality trials are needed to confirm these results, particularly using formoterol as LABA, aligning with the recommendations. Further research is imperative to optimize asthma management in preschool children.</p>","PeriodicalId":19658,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric Respiratory Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric Respiratory Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2024.09.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) are essential in asthma management, but the guidelines for treatment in preschool children remain heterogeneous worldwide. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of LABA + ICS therapy in asthmatic children under six years. We searched four databases, identifying six eligible studies (n = 1415 preschoolers), and in all the LABA used was salmeterol. Due to high heterogeneity, quantitative analysis was not feasible. Three before-and-after studies demonstrated significant reductions in unscheduled visits and hospitalizations due to asthma exacerbations with LABA + ICS. One RCT showed fewer exacerbations in the LABA + ICS group compared to ICS alone. Night-time awakenings decreased significantly in two studies but not in one RCT. Improvements in lung function using impulse oscillometry and FeNO levels were noted with LABA+ICS in one RCT. No significant adverse effects were reported. Despite positive findings, high-quality trials are needed to confirm these results, particularly using formoterol as LABA, aligning with the recommendations. Further research is imperative to optimize asthma management in preschool children.

在吸入皮质类固醇治疗学龄前儿童哮喘的基础上加用长效β-受体激动剂:系统综述。
吸入式皮质类固醇(ICS)和长效β-受体激动剂(LABA)是哮喘治疗的基本药物,但全球学龄前儿童的治疗指南仍不尽相同。本系统性综述评估了 LABA + ICS 治疗六岁以下哮喘儿童的疗效和安全性。我们检索了四个数据库,确定了六项符合条件的研究(n = 1415 名学龄前儿童),所有研究中使用的 LABA 均为沙美特罗。由于异质性较高,无法进行定量分析。三项前后对比研究表明,使用 LABA+ICS 可显著减少因哮喘加重而导致的计划外就诊和住院治疗。一项研究表明,与单独使用 ICS 相比,LABA + ICS 组的哮喘加重次数更少。在两项研究中,夜间觉醒次数明显减少,但在一项研究中却没有减少。在一项研究中,LABA+ICS 可改善脉冲振荡测量法的肺功能和 FeNO 水平。没有重大不良反应的报道。尽管有积极的研究结果,但仍需要高质量的试验来证实这些结果,尤其是使用福莫特罗作为 LABA,以符合建议。为了优化学龄前儿童的哮喘治疗,进一步的研究势在必行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: Paediatric Respiratory Reviews offers authors the opportunity to submit their own editorials, educational reviews and short communications on topics relevant to paediatric respiratory medicine. These peer reviewed contributions will complement the commissioned reviews which will continue to form an integral part of the journal. Subjects covered include: • Epidemiology • Immunology and cell biology • Physiology • Occupational disorders • The role of allergens and pollutants A particular emphasis is given to the recommendation of "best practice" for primary care physicians and paediatricians. Paediatric Respiratory Reviews is aimed at general paediatricians but it should also be read by specialist paediatric physicians and nurses, respiratory physicians and general practitioners. It is a journal for those who are busy and do not have time to read systematically through literature, but who need to stay up to date in the field of paediatric respiratory and sleep medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信