Jarn E M Theunissen, Els R M van Haaren, Caroline N A Frotscher, Rachelle R M Körver-Steeman, Alfred Janssen, Yvonne L J Vissers, James van Bastelaar, Anja Valentijn-Morsing, Lee Bouwman, Marc B I Lobbes
{"title":"Combining Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Radioactive-Free Magnetic Seed Localization of Non-palpable Breast Tumors: A Feasibility Study.","authors":"Jarn E M Theunissen, Els R M van Haaren, Caroline N A Frotscher, Rachelle R M Körver-Steeman, Alfred Janssen, Yvonne L J Vissers, James van Bastelaar, Anja Valentijn-Morsing, Lee Bouwman, Marc B I Lobbes","doi":"10.7150/jca.98597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Magnetic seed localization is a novel and reliable technique for perioperative localization of non-palpable breast cancers. However, due to susceptibility artifacts, magnetic seeds cannot be <i>in situ</i> during response monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with MRI. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) could provide an alternative modality for response monitoring while magnetic seeds are <i>in situ</i>. This feasibility study aimed to investigate whether implanted magnetic seeds cause imaging artifacts in CEM examinations. <b>Methods:</b> A phantom experiment and patient studies were conducted to assess the presence of imaging artifacts caused by magnetic seeds on CEM. Chicken breast filet phantoms containing magnetic seeds were imaged using CEM and MRI. Next, twenty women with non-palpable breast tumors scheduled for breast-conserving surgery were included and received a magnetic marker seed preoperatively. Immediately after seed implantation, postprocedural images were taken using the CEM mode on our mammography units. All images were assessed by two experienced breast radiologists for the presence of artifacts. Descriptive statistics were used to present the study results. <b>Results:</b> The phantom experiment revealed no imaging artifacts on CEM, whereas significant artifacts were present on MRI. This allowed us to continue with the patient studies, in which no imaging artifacts associated with magnetic seeds were observed at all. Surgical outcomes demonstrated successful retrieval of all magnetic seeds and negative surgical margins in 19 out of 20 cases. <b>Conclusion:</b> To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that the combination of CEM and magnetic seeds is feasible and does not cause any significant imaging artifacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.98597","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Magnetic seed localization is a novel and reliable technique for perioperative localization of non-palpable breast cancers. However, due to susceptibility artifacts, magnetic seeds cannot be in situ during response monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with MRI. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) could provide an alternative modality for response monitoring while magnetic seeds are in situ. This feasibility study aimed to investigate whether implanted magnetic seeds cause imaging artifacts in CEM examinations. Methods: A phantom experiment and patient studies were conducted to assess the presence of imaging artifacts caused by magnetic seeds on CEM. Chicken breast filet phantoms containing magnetic seeds were imaged using CEM and MRI. Next, twenty women with non-palpable breast tumors scheduled for breast-conserving surgery were included and received a magnetic marker seed preoperatively. Immediately after seed implantation, postprocedural images were taken using the CEM mode on our mammography units. All images were assessed by two experienced breast radiologists for the presence of artifacts. Descriptive statistics were used to present the study results. Results: The phantom experiment revealed no imaging artifacts on CEM, whereas significant artifacts were present on MRI. This allowed us to continue with the patient studies, in which no imaging artifacts associated with magnetic seeds were observed at all. Surgical outcomes demonstrated successful retrieval of all magnetic seeds and negative surgical margins in 19 out of 20 cases. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that the combination of CEM and magnetic seeds is feasible and does not cause any significant imaging artifacts.
背景:磁性种子定位是一种用于非肉眼可见乳腺癌围手术期定位的新型可靠技术。然而,由于磁共振成像的易感性伪影,磁性种子无法在新辅助化疗反应监测期间保持原位。对比增强乳腺 X 射线照相术(CEM)可作为磁性种子在原位时进行反应监测的替代方式。这项可行性研究旨在调查植入的磁性粒子是否会在 CEM 检查中造成成像伪影。研究方法通过模型实验和患者研究来评估磁性粒子是否会在 CEM 上造成成像伪影。使用 CEM 和 MRI 对含有磁性种子的鸡胸锉模型进行成像。接着,20 名患有不可触及乳腺肿瘤的妇女被纳入保乳手术计划,并在术前接受了磁性标记种子。种子植入后,我们立即使用乳腺放射摄影设备上的 CEM 模式拍摄了术后图像。所有图像均由两名经验丰富的乳腺放射科医生评估是否存在伪影。研究结果采用了描述性统计方法。研究结果模型实验显示,CEM 没有成像伪影,而磁共振成像则存在明显的伪影。这使我们能够继续对患者进行研究,在研究中完全没有观察到与磁性种子相关的成像伪影。手术结果显示,在 20 个病例中,有 19 例成功取出了所有磁性粒子,手术边缘呈阴性。结论:据我们所知,这是第一项证明 CEM 与磁性粒子相结合是可行的,并且不会造成任何明显的成像伪影的研究。