Therapeutic effects of probiotics on symptoms of depression in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Chia-Min Chen, Shun-Chin Liang, Cheuk-Kwan Sun, Yu-Shian Cheng, Yen-Hsiang Tang, Cheng Liu, Kuo-Chuan Hung
{"title":"Therapeutic effects of probiotics on symptoms of depression in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Chia-Min Chen, Shun-Chin Liang, Cheuk-Kwan Sun, Yu-Shian Cheng, Yen-Hsiang Tang, Cheng Liu, Kuo-Chuan Hung","doi":"10.1186/s13052-024-01807-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This meta-analysis aimed at investigating the therapeutic effects of probiotics against the symptoms of depression in children and adolescents as well as to identify the potential confounders. Following PRISMA guidelines, major databases were searched for randomized controlled trials focusing on effects of probiotics against the symptoms of depression in children and adolescents to analyze the effect size (ES) for primary outcomes (i.e., improvement in depressive symptoms) expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) and odds ratios (ORs) for continuous and categorical variables, respectively, with 95% confidence interval (CI). Meta-analysis of five studies (692 participants, mean age = 7.33 years, treatment duration 8-104 weeks) demonstrated no significant improvement in depressive symptoms in subjects receiving probiotics (SMD = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.33 to 0.41, p = 0.84, five studies, 692 participants). Subgroup analysis also showed no significant improvement associated with probiotic use relative to controls in the subgroup of studies focusing on individuals diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders (SMD = -0.11, 95% CI: -0.73 to 0.51, p = 0.72, three studies, 452 participants) and that recruiting the general population (SMD = 0.24, 95% CI: -0.43 to 0.91, p = 0.48, two studies, 240 participants). However, high levels of heterogeneity were found in both our primary results (I2 = 77%, p = 0.001) and subgroup analyses for those with neurodevelopmental disorders (I2 = 84%, p = 0.002) and the general population (I2 = 79%, p = 0.03). The results did not support the use of probiotics for relieving depressive symptoms compared with controls in children and adolescents diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders or in the general population. Nevertheless, given the high level of heterogeneity across the included trials and a lack of studies focusing on those with diagnoses of anxiety or depression in the current meta-analysis, further large-scale clinical investigations are required to elucidate the therapeutic potential of probiotics against depressive symptoms in these populations, especially in those diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders or depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":14511,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"50 1","pages":"239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545225/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-024-01807-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed at investigating the therapeutic effects of probiotics against the symptoms of depression in children and adolescents as well as to identify the potential confounders. Following PRISMA guidelines, major databases were searched for randomized controlled trials focusing on effects of probiotics against the symptoms of depression in children and adolescents to analyze the effect size (ES) for primary outcomes (i.e., improvement in depressive symptoms) expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) and odds ratios (ORs) for continuous and categorical variables, respectively, with 95% confidence interval (CI). Meta-analysis of five studies (692 participants, mean age = 7.33 years, treatment duration 8-104 weeks) demonstrated no significant improvement in depressive symptoms in subjects receiving probiotics (SMD = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.33 to 0.41, p = 0.84, five studies, 692 participants). Subgroup analysis also showed no significant improvement associated with probiotic use relative to controls in the subgroup of studies focusing on individuals diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders (SMD = -0.11, 95% CI: -0.73 to 0.51, p = 0.72, three studies, 452 participants) and that recruiting the general population (SMD = 0.24, 95% CI: -0.43 to 0.91, p = 0.48, two studies, 240 participants). However, high levels of heterogeneity were found in both our primary results (I2 = 77%, p = 0.001) and subgroup analyses for those with neurodevelopmental disorders (I2 = 84%, p = 0.002) and the general population (I2 = 79%, p = 0.03). The results did not support the use of probiotics for relieving depressive symptoms compared with controls in children and adolescents diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders or in the general population. Nevertheless, given the high level of heterogeneity across the included trials and a lack of studies focusing on those with diagnoses of anxiety or depression in the current meta-analysis, further large-scale clinical investigations are required to elucidate the therapeutic potential of probiotics against depressive symptoms in these populations, especially in those diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders or depression.

益生菌对儿童和青少年抑郁症状的治疗效果:系统综述和荟萃分析。
这项荟萃分析旨在研究益生菌对儿童和青少年抑郁症状的治疗效果,并确定潜在的混杂因素。根据PRISMA指南,研究人员在主要数据库中搜索了益生菌对儿童和青少年抑郁症状影响的随机对照试验,以分析主要结果(即抑郁症状的改善)的效应大小(ES),连续变量和分类变量分别以标准化平均差(SMD)和几率比(ORs)表示,并附有95%的置信区间(CI)。对五项研究(692 名参与者,平均年龄 = 7.33 岁,疗程 8-104 周)进行的元分析表明,接受益生菌治疗的受试者抑郁症状没有明显改善(SMD = 0.04,95% CI:-0.33 至 0.41,p = 0.84,五项研究,692 名参与者)。亚组分析还显示,在针对神经发育障碍患者的研究亚组(SMD = -0.11,95% CI:-0.73 至 0.51,p = 0.72,3 项研究,452 名参与者)和招募普通人群的研究亚组(SMD = 0.24,95% CI:-0.43 至 0.91,p = 0.48,2 项研究,240 名参与者)中,相对于对照组,使用益生菌并无明显改善。然而,在我们的主要结果(I2 = 77%,p = 0.001)以及神经发育障碍患者(I2 = 84%,p = 0.002)和普通人群(I2 = 79%,p = 0.03)的亚组分析中都发现了高度的异质性。与对照组相比,研究结果不支持在确诊患有神经发育障碍的儿童和青少年或普通人群中使用益生菌来缓解抑郁症状。尽管如此,鉴于所纳入的试验存在高度异质性,而且在目前的荟萃分析中缺乏针对诊断为焦虑症或抑郁症患者的研究,因此需要进一步开展大规模临床研究,以阐明益生菌对这些人群抑郁症状的治疗潜力,尤其是对那些诊断为神经发育障碍或抑郁症的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.90%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Italian Journal of Pediatrics is an open access peer-reviewed journal that includes all aspects of pediatric medicine. The journal also covers health service and public health research that addresses primary care issues. The journal provides a high-quality forum for pediatricians and other healthcare professionals to report and discuss up-to-the-minute research and expert reviews in the field of pediatric medicine. The journal will continue to develop the range of articles published to enable this invaluable resource to stay at the forefront of the field. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, which commenced in 1975 as Rivista Italiana di Pediatria, provides a high-quality forum for pediatricians and other healthcare professionals to report and discuss up-to-the-minute research and expert reviews in the field of pediatric medicine. The journal will continue to develop the range of articles published to enable this invaluable resource to stay at the forefront of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信