MRI Dixon Fat-Corrected Look-Locker T1 Mapping for Quantification of Liver Fibrosis and Inflammation-A Comparison With the Non-Fat-Corrected Shortened Modified Look-Locker Inversion Recovery Technique.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jeremias Bendicht Klaus, Ute Goerke, Markus Klarhöfer, Mahesh Bharath Keerthivasan, Bernd Jung, Annalisa Berzigotti, Lukas Ebner, Justus Roos, Andreas Christe, Verena Carola Obmann, Adrian Thomas Huber
{"title":"MRI Dixon Fat-Corrected Look-Locker T1 Mapping for Quantification of Liver Fibrosis and Inflammation-A Comparison With the Non-Fat-Corrected Shortened Modified Look-Locker Inversion Recovery Technique.","authors":"Jeremias Bendicht Klaus, Ute Goerke, Markus Klarhöfer, Mahesh Bharath Keerthivasan, Bernd Jung, Annalisa Berzigotti, Lukas Ebner, Justus Roos, Andreas Christe, Verena Carola Obmann, Adrian Thomas Huber","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluates the impact of liver steatosis on the discriminative ability for liver fibrosis and inflammation using a novel Dixon water-only fat-corrected Look-Locker T1 mapping sequence, compared with a standard shortened Modified Look-Locker Inversion Recovery (shMOLLI) sequence, with the aim of overcoming the limitation of steatosis-related confounding in liver T1 mapping.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>3 T magnetic resonance imaging of the liver including the 2 T1 mapping sequences and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) was prospectively performed in 24 healthy volunteers and 38 patients with histologically proven liver fibrosis evaluated within 90 days of liver biopsy. Paired Mann-Whitney test compared sequences between participants with and without significant liver steatosis (PDFF cutoff 10%), and unpaired Kruskal-Wallis test compared healthy volunteers to patients with early (F0-2) and advanced (F3-4) liver fibrosis, as well as low (A0-1) and marked (A2-3) inflammatory activity. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models assessed the impact of liver steatosis on both sequences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dixon_W T1 was higher than shMOLLI T1 in participants without steatosis (median 896 ms vs 890 ms, P = 0.04), but lower in participants with liver steatosis (median 891 ms vs 973 ms, P < 0.001). Both methods accurately differentiated between volunteers and patients with early and advanced fibrosis (Dixon_W 849 ms, 910 ms, 947 ms, P = 0.011; shMOLLI 836 ms, 918 ms, 978 ms, P < 0.001), and those with mild and marked inflammation (Dixon_W 849 ms, 896 ms, 941 ms, P < 0.01; shMOLLI 836 ms, 885 ms, 978 ms, P < 0.001). Univariate logistic regression showed slightly lower performance of the Dixon_W sequence in differentiating fibrosis (0.69 vs 0.73, P < 0.01), compensated by adding liver PDFF in the multivariate model (0.77 vs 0.75, P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dixon water-only fat-corrected Look-Locker T1 mapping accurately identifies liver fibrosis and inflammation, with less dependency on liver steatosis than the widely adopted shMOLLI T1 mapping technique, which may improve its predictive value for these conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":"59 11","pages":"754-760"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001084","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluates the impact of liver steatosis on the discriminative ability for liver fibrosis and inflammation using a novel Dixon water-only fat-corrected Look-Locker T1 mapping sequence, compared with a standard shortened Modified Look-Locker Inversion Recovery (shMOLLI) sequence, with the aim of overcoming the limitation of steatosis-related confounding in liver T1 mapping.

Materials and methods: 3 T magnetic resonance imaging of the liver including the 2 T1 mapping sequences and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) was prospectively performed in 24 healthy volunteers and 38 patients with histologically proven liver fibrosis evaluated within 90 days of liver biopsy. Paired Mann-Whitney test compared sequences between participants with and without significant liver steatosis (PDFF cutoff 10%), and unpaired Kruskal-Wallis test compared healthy volunteers to patients with early (F0-2) and advanced (F3-4) liver fibrosis, as well as low (A0-1) and marked (A2-3) inflammatory activity. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models assessed the impact of liver steatosis on both sequences.

Results: Dixon_W T1 was higher than shMOLLI T1 in participants without steatosis (median 896 ms vs 890 ms, P = 0.04), but lower in participants with liver steatosis (median 891 ms vs 973 ms, P < 0.001). Both methods accurately differentiated between volunteers and patients with early and advanced fibrosis (Dixon_W 849 ms, 910 ms, 947 ms, P = 0.011; shMOLLI 836 ms, 918 ms, 978 ms, P < 0.001), and those with mild and marked inflammation (Dixon_W 849 ms, 896 ms, 941 ms, P < 0.01; shMOLLI 836 ms, 885 ms, 978 ms, P < 0.001). Univariate logistic regression showed slightly lower performance of the Dixon_W sequence in differentiating fibrosis (0.69 vs 0.73, P < 0.01), compensated by adding liver PDFF in the multivariate model (0.77 vs 0.75, P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Dixon water-only fat-corrected Look-Locker T1 mapping accurately identifies liver fibrosis and inflammation, with less dependency on liver steatosis than the widely adopted shMOLLI T1 mapping technique, which may improve its predictive value for these conditions.

用于肝纤维化和炎症定量的 MRI Dixon 脂肪校正 Look-Locker T1 图谱--与非脂肪校正的缩短改良 Look-Locker 反转恢复技术的比较。
研究目的本研究使用新型迪克森纯水脂肪校正 Look-Locker T1 映射序列与标准缩短改良 Look-Locker 反转恢复(shMOLLI)序列比较,评估肝脏脂肪变性对肝纤维化和炎症鉴别能力的影响,旨在克服肝脏 T1 映射中脂肪变性相关混杂因素的限制。材料与方法:前瞻性地对 24 名健康志愿者和 38 名在肝活检后 90 天内经组织学证实患有肝纤维化的患者进行了肝脏 3 T 磁共振成像,包括 2 个 T1 映像序列和质子密度脂肪分数 (PDFF)。配对 Mann-Whitney 检验比较了有无明显肝脏脂肪变性(PDFF 临界值为 10%)的参与者之间的序列,非配对 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较了健康志愿者与早期(F0-2)和晚期(F3-4)肝纤维化患者,以及炎症活性低(A0-1)和明显(A2-3)的患者之间的序列。单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型评估了肝脏脂肪变性对两种序列的影响:在无脂肪变性的参与者中,Dixon_W T1高于shMOLLI T1(中位数为896 ms vs 890 ms,P = 0.04),但在肝脏脂肪变性的参与者中,Dixon_W T1低于shMOLLI T1(中位数为891 ms vs 973 ms,P < 0.001)。两种方法都能准确区分志愿者与早期和晚期肝纤维化患者(Dixon_W 849 ms、910 ms、947 ms,P = 0.011;shMOLLI 836 ms、918 ms、978 ms,P < 0.001),以及轻度和明显炎症患者(Dixon_W 849 ms、896 ms、941 ms,P < 0.01;shMOLLI 836 ms、885 ms、978 ms,P < 0.001)。单变量逻辑回归显示,Dixon_W序列在区分纤维化方面的性能略低(0.69 vs 0.73,P < 0.01),但在多变量模型中加入肝脏PDFF后,其性能得到补偿(0.77 vs 0.75,P < 0.01):结论:Dixon纯水脂肪校正Look-Locker T1图谱能准确识别肝纤维化和炎症,与广泛采用的shMOLLI T1图谱技术相比,对肝脏脂肪变性的依赖性更低,这可能会提高其对这些病症的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信