Innovative Categorization and Operative Management of Auditory Ossicle Disruption Following Trauma: Therapeutic Efficacy and Interventional Paradigms.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.7150/ijms.103532
Yajing Wang, Wenjun Chen, Jiahao Liu, Guowang Wang, Yongkang Ou
{"title":"Innovative Categorization and Operative Management of Auditory Ossicle Disruption Following Trauma: Therapeutic Efficacy and Interventional Paradigms.","authors":"Yajing Wang, Wenjun Chen, Jiahao Liu, Guowang Wang, Yongkang Ou","doi":"10.7150/ijms.103532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, there is no consensus on the treatment protocol for ossicular chain trauma. This study aims to investigate the classification and treatment strategies for traumatic ossicular chain dislocation. We retrospectively analyzed 15 patients. Traumatic ossicular chain dislocations were categorized based on the location of trauma identified during surgery: Type I-ossicular trauma without stapediovestibular dislocation; Type II-stapediovestibular dislocation (with or without associated incus dislocation). Of the 10 patients with Type I trauma, 9 experienced head trauma, and 1 had a penetrating injury to the external auditory canal. Among these, 2 cases involved incudomalleolar dislocation, 2 cases incus dislocation, 5 cases incudostapedial dislocation, and 1 case a fracture of the anterior and posterior arches of the stapes. Seven patients exhibited conductive hearing loss, while 3 presented with mixed hearing loss. Ossiculoplasty was performed using partial ossicular replacement prostheses (PORP) in 8 patients and total ossicular replacement prostheses (TORP) in 2 patients. Postoperative air conduction thresholds significantly improved in all 10 patients. In Type II trauma, all 5 patients had a penetrating injury to the external auditory canal, resulting in varying degrees of hearing loss. Postoperatively, 3 patients experienced improvement in hearing, while 2 showed no significant change. All patients developed vertigo and tinnitus following the trauma, with vertigo resolving after surgery. Pneumolabyrinth was detected in 2 patients. We propose a novel classification system for traumatic ossicular chain dislocation. Treatment strategies should be tailored according to the specific trauma type.</p>","PeriodicalId":14031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"21 14","pages":"2705-2713"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.103532","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, there is no consensus on the treatment protocol for ossicular chain trauma. This study aims to investigate the classification and treatment strategies for traumatic ossicular chain dislocation. We retrospectively analyzed 15 patients. Traumatic ossicular chain dislocations were categorized based on the location of trauma identified during surgery: Type I-ossicular trauma without stapediovestibular dislocation; Type II-stapediovestibular dislocation (with or without associated incus dislocation). Of the 10 patients with Type I trauma, 9 experienced head trauma, and 1 had a penetrating injury to the external auditory canal. Among these, 2 cases involved incudomalleolar dislocation, 2 cases incus dislocation, 5 cases incudostapedial dislocation, and 1 case a fracture of the anterior and posterior arches of the stapes. Seven patients exhibited conductive hearing loss, while 3 presented with mixed hearing loss. Ossiculoplasty was performed using partial ossicular replacement prostheses (PORP) in 8 patients and total ossicular replacement prostheses (TORP) in 2 patients. Postoperative air conduction thresholds significantly improved in all 10 patients. In Type II trauma, all 5 patients had a penetrating injury to the external auditory canal, resulting in varying degrees of hearing loss. Postoperatively, 3 patients experienced improvement in hearing, while 2 showed no significant change. All patients developed vertigo and tinnitus following the trauma, with vertigo resolving after surgery. Pneumolabyrinth was detected in 2 patients. We propose a novel classification system for traumatic ossicular chain dislocation. Treatment strategies should be tailored according to the specific trauma type.

外伤后听小骨破坏的创新分类和手术治疗:治疗效果和介入范例。
目前,关于听骨链创伤的治疗方案尚未达成共识。本研究旨在探讨外伤性听骨链脱位的分类和治疗策略。我们对 15 例患者进行了回顾性分析。外伤性听骨链脱位根据手术中发现的创伤位置进行分类:I型-无镫骨前庭脱位的听骨外伤;II型-镫骨前庭脱位(伴有或不伴有切迹脱位)。在10例I型外伤患者中,9例为头部外伤,1例为外耳道穿透伤。其中,2 例涉及门臼齿脱位,2 例涉及门骨脱位,5 例涉及门镫骨脱位,1 例涉及镫骨前后弓骨折。7 名患者表现为传导性听力损失,3 名患者表现为混合性听力损失。8名患者使用了部分听骨置换假体(PORP),2名患者使用了全听骨置换假体(TORP)。所有 10 名患者的术后气导阈值均有明显改善。在第二类创伤中,5 名患者的外耳道均受到穿透性损伤,导致不同程度的听力损失。术后,3 名患者的听力有所改善,2 名患者没有明显变化。所有患者在创伤后都出现了眩晕和耳鸣,手术后眩晕症状消失。2 名患者被检测出患有气管炎。我们提出了一种新的外伤性听骨链脱位分类系统。治疗策略应根据具体的创伤类型量身定制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Original research papers, reviews, and short research communications in any medical related area can be submitted to the Journal on the understanding that the work has not been published previously in whole or part and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical medicine are both considered. There is no restriction on the length of research papers and reviews, although authors are encouraged to be concise. Short research communication is limited to be under 2500 words.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信