Epineural Scarring Visualization and Noninvasive Quantification of a Severe Posttraumatic Complication: An Experimental Magnetic Resonance Neurography Study.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Merle Brunnée, Martin Aman, Maximilian Mayrhofer-Schmid, Manuel Fischer, Simeon C Daeschler, Tess Klemm, Ulrich Kneser, Kianush Karimian-Jazi, Michael O Breckwoldt, Leila Harhaus, Sabine Heiland, Martin Bendszus, Arne H Boecker, Daniel Schwarz
{"title":"Epineural Scarring Visualization and Noninvasive Quantification of a Severe Posttraumatic Complication: An Experimental Magnetic Resonance Neurography Study.","authors":"Merle Brunnée, Martin Aman, Maximilian Mayrhofer-Schmid, Manuel Fischer, Simeon C Daeschler, Tess Klemm, Ulrich Kneser, Kianush Karimian-Jazi, Michael O Breckwoldt, Leila Harhaus, Sabine Heiland, Martin Bendszus, Arne H Boecker, Daniel Schwarz","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Peripheral nerve scarring is a severe yet common complication following nerve injury or surgery that can lead to impaired nerve function, including chronic pain and sensory or motor deficits. In this study, we aimed to establish high-resolution magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) to accurately visualize and monitor de novo-formed epineural fibrotic adhesions (EFAs) of the sciatic nerve in a rat nerve injury model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Employing an established model to induce overshooting EFA, the study included 3 experimental groups of animals (n = 6 each): a positive control group (PC), an intervention group (IG), and a sham group. All groups underwent surgical nerve exposure: both PC and IG received an application of 10 μL 2.5% glutaraldehyde to induce EFA, but only IG received an additional preventive wrapping of the nerve with a collagen-containing matrix. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed 6, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively using a standardized protocol including T2w and T1w without and with contrast media. Motor function and nerve regeneration was assessed using the visual static sciatic index. Histological specimens were obtained 12 weeks postoperatively and correlated with imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On high-resolution MRN, prominently contrast-enhancing epineural sleeves were present in vivo, which corresponded to histologically confirmed EFA (ratio of EFA to nerve area MRN 1.512 ± 0.106 vs histological ratio 1.459 ± 0.208, nonsignificant). As expected, average EFA in IG (0.310 ± 0.118 mm2) was smaller than in PC (0.909 ± 0.212 mm2, P < 0.01). Also, the average EFA in sham (0.386 ± 0.030 mm2) was less pronounced than in PC (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the average EFA between IG und sham. The EFA correlated with the functional outcome, which was measured by visual static sciatic index (correlation coefficient -0.59, P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the present study for the first time confirm the clinical observation that epineural thickening on contrast-enhanced T1w imaging following manipulation to a nerve indeed corresponds to overshooting epineural scarring, which may be linked to impaired nerve function. This can be followed noninvasively in vivo over time providing an important basis for clinical decision-making in cases where further invasive therapies may be necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001132","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Peripheral nerve scarring is a severe yet common complication following nerve injury or surgery that can lead to impaired nerve function, including chronic pain and sensory or motor deficits. In this study, we aimed to establish high-resolution magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) to accurately visualize and monitor de novo-formed epineural fibrotic adhesions (EFAs) of the sciatic nerve in a rat nerve injury model.

Methods: Employing an established model to induce overshooting EFA, the study included 3 experimental groups of animals (n = 6 each): a positive control group (PC), an intervention group (IG), and a sham group. All groups underwent surgical nerve exposure: both PC and IG received an application of 10 μL 2.5% glutaraldehyde to induce EFA, but only IG received an additional preventive wrapping of the nerve with a collagen-containing matrix. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed 6, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively using a standardized protocol including T2w and T1w without and with contrast media. Motor function and nerve regeneration was assessed using the visual static sciatic index. Histological specimens were obtained 12 weeks postoperatively and correlated with imaging.

Results: On high-resolution MRN, prominently contrast-enhancing epineural sleeves were present in vivo, which corresponded to histologically confirmed EFA (ratio of EFA to nerve area MRN 1.512 ± 0.106 vs histological ratio 1.459 ± 0.208, nonsignificant). As expected, average EFA in IG (0.310 ± 0.118 mm2) was smaller than in PC (0.909 ± 0.212 mm2, P < 0.01). Also, the average EFA in sham (0.386 ± 0.030 mm2) was less pronounced than in PC (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the average EFA between IG und sham. The EFA correlated with the functional outcome, which was measured by visual static sciatic index (correlation coefficient -0.59, P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The results of the present study for the first time confirm the clinical observation that epineural thickening on contrast-enhanced T1w imaging following manipulation to a nerve indeed corresponds to overshooting epineural scarring, which may be linked to impaired nerve function. This can be followed noninvasively in vivo over time providing an important basis for clinical decision-making in cases where further invasive therapies may be necessary.

严重创伤后并发症的神经外膜瘢痕可视化和无创量化:磁共振神经成像实验研究》。
目的:周围神经瘢痕是神经损伤或手术后常见的严重并发症,可导致神经功能受损,包括慢性疼痛、感觉或运动障碍。在本研究中,我们旨在建立高分辨率磁共振神经成像(MRN),以在大鼠神经损伤模型中准确观察和监测坐骨神经新形成的神经外纤维粘连(EFAs):该研究采用已建立的模型来诱导过冲性 EFA,包括 3 组实验动物(每组 6 只):阳性对照组(PC)、干预组(IG)和假组。所有实验组都接受了神经暴露手术:PC 组和 IG 组都使用了 10 μL 2.5% 戊二醛来诱导 EFA,但只有 IG 组额外使用了含胶原蛋白的基质对神经进行预防性包裹。术后 6 周、8 周和 12 周采用标准化方案进行了磁共振成像,包括无造影剂和有造影剂的 T2w 和 T1w。使用视觉静态坐骨神经指数评估运动功能和神经再生情况。术后 12 周获得组织学标本,并与成像结果进行对比:在高分辨率 MRN 上,体内存在明显的造影剂增强的会厌神经套管,与组织学证实的 EFA 相对应(EFA 与神经区域 MRN 的比率为 1.512 ± 0.106 vs 组织学比率 1.459 ± 0.208,无显著性)。不出所料,IG 的平均 EFA(0.310 ± 0.118 mm2)小于 PC(0.909 ± 0.212 mm2,P < 0.01)。此外,假体的平均 EFA(0.386 ± 0.030 mm2)也小于 PC(P < 0.01)。IG 和假体的平均 EFA 没有明显差异。EFA与通过视觉静态坐骨神经指数测量的功能结果相关(相关系数为-0.59,P < 0.05):本研究的结果首次证实了临床观察结果,即对神经进行操作后,对比增强 T1w 成像显示的神经外膜增厚确实与神经外膜瘢痕过度增生相对应,这可能与神经功能受损有关。这可以在体内无创跟踪一段时间,为临床决策提供重要依据,以确定是否有必要采取进一步的侵入性疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信