Exploring the role of mitophagy-related genes in breast cancer: subtype classification and prognosis prediction.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.7150/ijms.100785
Lizhao Wang, Nan Mei, Jianpeng Li, Heyan Chen, Jianjun He, Ru Wang
{"title":"Exploring the role of mitophagy-related genes in breast cancer: subtype classification and prognosis prediction.","authors":"Lizhao Wang, Nan Mei, Jianpeng Li, Heyan Chen, Jianjun He, Ru Wang","doi":"10.7150/ijms.100785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women globally and poses the leading health threat to women worldwide, with persistently high incidence rates. Mitophagy is a selective autophagy process that specifically targets mitochondria within the cell, maintaining cellular energy balance and metabolic health by identifying and degrading damaged mitochondria. Although there is an understanding of the relationship between mitophagy and cancer, the specific mechanisms remain unclear due to the complexity and diversity of mitophagy, suggesting that it could be an effective and more targeted therapeutic approach for BC. <b>Methods:</b> In this study, we meticulously examined the BC expression and clinical pathology data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to assess the expression profiles, copy number variations (CNV), and to investigate the correlation, function, and prognostic impact of 34 mitophagy-related genes (MRGs). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified based on group classification. Lasso and Cox regression were used to determine prognostic genes for constructing a nomogram. Single-cell analysis mapped the distribution of these genes in BC cells. Additionally, the association between gene-derived risk scores and factors such as immune infiltration, tumor mutational burden (TMB), cancer stem cell (CSC) index, and drug responses was studied. <i>In vitro</i> experiments were conducted to confirm the analyses. <b>Results:</b> We included 34 MRGs and subsequently generated a risk score for 7 genes, including RPLP2, PCDHGA2, PRKAA2, CLIC6, FLT3, CHI3L1, and IYD. It was found that the low-risk group had better overall survival (OS) in BC, higher immune scores, but lower tumor mutational burden (TMB) and cancer stem cell (CSC) index, as well as lower IC50 values for commonly used drugs. To enhance clinical applicability, age and staging were incorporated into the risk score, and a more comprehensive nomogram was constructed to predict OS. This nomogram was validated and showed good predictive performance, with area under the curve (AUC) values for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS of 0.895, 0.765, and 0.728, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our findings underscore the profound impact of prognostic genes on the immune response and prognostic outcomes in BC, indicating that they can provide new avenues for personalized BC treatment and potentially improve clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"21 14","pages":"2664-2682"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.100785","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women globally and poses the leading health threat to women worldwide, with persistently high incidence rates. Mitophagy is a selective autophagy process that specifically targets mitochondria within the cell, maintaining cellular energy balance and metabolic health by identifying and degrading damaged mitochondria. Although there is an understanding of the relationship between mitophagy and cancer, the specific mechanisms remain unclear due to the complexity and diversity of mitophagy, suggesting that it could be an effective and more targeted therapeutic approach for BC. Methods: In this study, we meticulously examined the BC expression and clinical pathology data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to assess the expression profiles, copy number variations (CNV), and to investigate the correlation, function, and prognostic impact of 34 mitophagy-related genes (MRGs). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified based on group classification. Lasso and Cox regression were used to determine prognostic genes for constructing a nomogram. Single-cell analysis mapped the distribution of these genes in BC cells. Additionally, the association between gene-derived risk scores and factors such as immune infiltration, tumor mutational burden (TMB), cancer stem cell (CSC) index, and drug responses was studied. In vitro experiments were conducted to confirm the analyses. Results: We included 34 MRGs and subsequently generated a risk score for 7 genes, including RPLP2, PCDHGA2, PRKAA2, CLIC6, FLT3, CHI3L1, and IYD. It was found that the low-risk group had better overall survival (OS) in BC, higher immune scores, but lower tumor mutational burden (TMB) and cancer stem cell (CSC) index, as well as lower IC50 values for commonly used drugs. To enhance clinical applicability, age and staging were incorporated into the risk score, and a more comprehensive nomogram was constructed to predict OS. This nomogram was validated and showed good predictive performance, with area under the curve (AUC) values for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS of 0.895, 0.765, and 0.728, respectively. Conclusion: Our findings underscore the profound impact of prognostic genes on the immune response and prognostic outcomes in BC, indicating that they can provide new avenues for personalized BC treatment and potentially improve clinical outcomes.

探索有丝分裂相关基因在乳腺癌中的作用:亚型分类和预后预测。
背景:乳腺癌(BC)是全球妇女最常见的癌症,也是威胁全球妇女健康的主要癌症,发病率居高不下。有丝分裂是一种选择性自噬过程,它专门针对细胞内的线粒体,通过识别和降解受损的线粒体来维持细胞能量平衡和代谢健康。尽管人们对有丝分裂与癌症之间的关系有所了解,但由于有丝分裂的复杂性和多样性,其具体机制仍不清楚,这表明有丝分裂可能是治疗 BC 的一种有效且更具针对性的方法。研究方法在这项研究中,我们仔细研究了癌症基因组图谱(The Cancer Genome Atlas,TCGA)中的BC表达和临床病理数据,评估了34个有丝分裂相关基因(MRGs)的表达谱、拷贝数变异(CNV),并研究了其相关性、功能和对预后的影响。根据组别分类确定了差异表达基因(DEG)。利用Lasso和Cox回归确定预后基因,以构建提名图。单细胞分析绘制了这些基因在 BC 细胞中的分布图。此外,还研究了基因衍生风险评分与免疫浸润、肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)、癌症干细胞(CSC)指数和药物反应等因素之间的关联。为证实分析结果,还进行了体外实验。结果我们纳入了 34 个 MRG,随后为 7 个基因(包括 RPLP2、PCDHGA2、PRKAA2、CLIC6、FLT3、CHI3L1 和 IYD)生成了风险评分。研究发现,低风险组的BC总生存期(OS)较好,免疫评分较高,但肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)和癌症干细胞(CSC)指数较低,常用药物的IC50值也较低。为了提高临床适用性,将年龄和分期纳入了风险评分,并构建了一个更全面的提名图来预测OS。该提名图经过验证,显示出良好的预测性能,1年、3年和5年OS的曲线下面积(AUC)值分别为0.895、0.765和0.728。结论我们的研究结果强调了预后基因对 BC 免疫反应和预后结果的深远影响,表明它们可以为 BC 的个性化治疗提供新的途径,并有可能改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Original research papers, reviews, and short research communications in any medical related area can be submitted to the Journal on the understanding that the work has not been published previously in whole or part and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical medicine are both considered. There is no restriction on the length of research papers and reviews, although authors are encouraged to be concise. Short research communication is limited to be under 2500 words.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信