Non-Invasively Measured Myocardial Torsional Modulus: Comparison to Invasive Evaluation of Diastolic Function.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
M Rifqi Aufan, Himanshu Gupta, Oleg F Sharifov, Gilbert J Perry, Thomas S Denney, Steven G Lloyd
{"title":"Non-Invasively Measured Myocardial Torsional Modulus: Comparison to Invasive Evaluation of Diastolic Function.","authors":"M Rifqi Aufan, Himanshu Gupta, Oleg F Sharifov, Gilbert J Perry, Thomas S Denney, Steven G Lloyd","doi":"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left ventricular (LV) diastolic function is a key determinant of cardiac output; impairments of diastolic function can lead to heart failure. Assessment of diastolic function is challenging due to several factors, including the load dependence of ventricular filling. We developed a method using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to model the untwisting motion of the LV as a viscoelastic damped oscillator to derive myocardial torsional modulus (µ) and frictional damping characteristics, and hypothesized that the torsional modulus would correlate with invasive measures of LV stiffness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-two participants who underwent invasive left heart catheterization (LHC) and CMR for the evaluation of chest pain were evaluated. µ and damping constants were determined by solving a system of equations using CMR-measured LV geometrical and angular displacement data during diastole. Time constant of pressure decay τ and chamber stiffness β were measured from invasive LHC and CMR-derived volume data as comparison metrics of diastolic function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>µ was correlated with chamber stiffness constant β and time constant of pressure decay τ, derived from invasive measurement (R=0.78, p<0.001, and R=0.51, p=0.014, respectively). µ was also correlated with pre-A-wave diastolic pressure (0.67, p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We propose a new method to objectively evaluate diastolic relaxation properties of the LV. This method may have promise to replace invasive, catheter-based assessment of diastolic function.</p>","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":" ","pages":"101122"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101122","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Left ventricular (LV) diastolic function is a key determinant of cardiac output; impairments of diastolic function can lead to heart failure. Assessment of diastolic function is challenging due to several factors, including the load dependence of ventricular filling. We developed a method using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to model the untwisting motion of the LV as a viscoelastic damped oscillator to derive myocardial torsional modulus (µ) and frictional damping characteristics, and hypothesized that the torsional modulus would correlate with invasive measures of LV stiffness.

Methods: Twenty-two participants who underwent invasive left heart catheterization (LHC) and CMR for the evaluation of chest pain were evaluated. µ and damping constants were determined by solving a system of equations using CMR-measured LV geometrical and angular displacement data during diastole. Time constant of pressure decay τ and chamber stiffness β were measured from invasive LHC and CMR-derived volume data as comparison metrics of diastolic function.

Results: µ was correlated with chamber stiffness constant β and time constant of pressure decay τ, derived from invasive measurement (R=0.78, p<0.001, and R=0.51, p=0.014, respectively). µ was also correlated with pre-A-wave diastolic pressure (0.67, p=0.001).

Conclusions: We propose a new method to objectively evaluate diastolic relaxation properties of the LV. This method may have promise to replace invasive, catheter-based assessment of diastolic function.

非侵入性测量的心肌扭转模量:与有创舒张功能评估的比较
背景:左心室舒张功能是决定心输出量的关键因素;舒张功能受损可导致心力衰竭。由于心室充盈的负荷依赖性等多种因素,舒张功能的评估具有挑战性。我们开发了一种使用心血管磁共振成像(CMR)的方法,将左心室的非扭转运动建模为粘弹性阻尼振荡器,从而得出心肌扭转模量(µ)和摩擦阻尼特性,并假设扭转模量与左心室僵硬度的有创测量相关:方法: 对因胸痛进行有创左心导管检查(LHC)和CMR检查的22名参与者进行了评估。通过使用 CMR 测量的舒张期左心室几何和角位移数据求解方程组,确定了 µ 和阻尼常数。压力衰减时间常数τ和心腔硬度β是通过有创 LHC 和 CMR 导出的容积数据测量的,作为舒张功能的比较指标:结果:µ 与有创测量得出的心腔僵硬度常数 β 和压力衰减时间常数 τ 相关(R=0.78,pConclusions:我们提出了一种客观评估左心室舒张松弛特性的新方法。这种方法有望取代基于导管的有创舒张功能评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system. New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis. Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR. Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信