Utilization of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in pediatric laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a quality improvement project.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Fari Fall, Devon Pace, Julia Brothers, Danielle Jaszczyszyn, Julia Gong, Manish Purohit, Kesavan Sadacharam, Robert S Lang, Loren Berman, Connie Lin, Kirk Reichard
{"title":"Utilization of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in pediatric laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a quality improvement project.","authors":"Fari Fall, Devon Pace, Julia Brothers, Danielle Jaszczyszyn, Julia Gong, Manish Purohit, Kesavan Sadacharam, Robert S Lang, Loren Berman, Connie Lin, Kirk Reichard","doi":"10.1007/s00383-024-05874-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The obesity epidemic has led to an increased number of adolescents requiring metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), but there is paucity of data on the impact of implementing all aspects of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols to improve outcomes in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented a comprehensive ERAS pathway for adolescents undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Key elements included pre-operative fasting with carbohydrate loading in the morning of surgery, comprehensive anti-emetic and analgesic regimens including intra-operative lidocaine infusion (initiated before formal ERAS launch), regional anesthesia, and early goal-directed ambulation. We tracked opioid utilization, rescue anti-emetic use, time to oral intake, and hospital length of stay (HLOS) as outcome measures, and post-operative pain and returns to the system as balancing measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-six patients (52 patients pre-ERAS and 34 patients post-ERAS) underwent LSG with no differences in demographics. The post-ERAS group had earlier time to oral intake (3.0 vs. 5.5 h, p = 0.003), used less rescue anti-emetics, (8.0 vs. 16.0 mg, p < 0.001), and had shorter HLOS (33 vs. 54 h, p < 0.001) but no difference in opioid use (0.370 vs. 0.435 MME/kg, p = 0.17), post-operative pain scores or return to the system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our novel use of bariatric-specific ERAS protocol with intra-operative lidocaine infusion accelerates the time to goal-directed oral intake and decreases HLOS without increasing the rate of returns to the system. This study highlights the feasibility and effectiveness of adapting adult ERAS protocols to the pediatric MBS population.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"40 1","pages":"297"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05874-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The obesity epidemic has led to an increased number of adolescents requiring metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), but there is paucity of data on the impact of implementing all aspects of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols to improve outcomes in this population.

Methods: We implemented a comprehensive ERAS pathway for adolescents undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Key elements included pre-operative fasting with carbohydrate loading in the morning of surgery, comprehensive anti-emetic and analgesic regimens including intra-operative lidocaine infusion (initiated before formal ERAS launch), regional anesthesia, and early goal-directed ambulation. We tracked opioid utilization, rescue anti-emetic use, time to oral intake, and hospital length of stay (HLOS) as outcome measures, and post-operative pain and returns to the system as balancing measures.

Results: Eighty-six patients (52 patients pre-ERAS and 34 patients post-ERAS) underwent LSG with no differences in demographics. The post-ERAS group had earlier time to oral intake (3.0 vs. 5.5 h, p = 0.003), used less rescue anti-emetics, (8.0 vs. 16.0 mg, p < 0.001), and had shorter HLOS (33 vs. 54 h, p < 0.001) but no difference in opioid use (0.370 vs. 0.435 MME/kg, p = 0.17), post-operative pain scores or return to the system.

Conclusions: Our novel use of bariatric-specific ERAS protocol with intra-operative lidocaine infusion accelerates the time to goal-directed oral intake and decreases HLOS without increasing the rate of returns to the system. This study highlights the feasibility and effectiveness of adapting adult ERAS protocols to the pediatric MBS population.

Level of evidence: Level III.

在小儿腹腔镜袖带胃切除术中使用术后恢复强化方案(ERAS):一项质量改进项目。
背景:肥胖症的流行导致需要进行代谢和减肥手术(MBS)的青少年人数增加,但有关实施全方位术后恢复(ERAS)方案对改善该人群预后的影响的数据却很少:我们为接受腹腔镜袖带胃切除术(LSG)的青少年实施了全面的ERAS路径。主要内容包括:术前禁食,手术当天早上进行碳水化合物摄入;综合止吐和镇痛方案,包括术中利多卡因输注(在ERAS正式启动前开始);区域麻醉;以及早期目标引导下的行走。我们追踪了阿片类药物的使用情况、止吐药的抢救使用情况、口服时间和住院时间(HLOS)作为结果测量指标,术后疼痛和返回系统作为平衡测量指标:86名患者(52名ERAS术前患者和34名ERAS术后患者)接受了LSG手术,两组患者的人口统计学特征无差异。ERAS术后组患者的口服时间更早(3.0 小时对 5.5 小时,p = 0.003),止吐药使用量更少(8.0 毫克对 16.0 毫克,p = 0.003),但ERAS术后组患者的止吐药使用量更多:我们在术中输注利多卡因的肥胖症专用 ERAS 方案的新颖使用加快了目标导向口服的时间,降低了 HLOS,同时不会增加系统的返修率。这项研究强调了将成人ERAS方案应用于儿科MBS人群的可行性和有效性:证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信