Whole genome sequencing distinguishes skin colonizing from infection-associated Cutibacterium acnes isolates.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology Pub Date : 2024-10-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcimb.2024.1433783
Andreas Podbielski, Thomas Köller, Philipp Warnke, Israel Barrantes, Bernd Kreikemeyer
{"title":"Whole genome sequencing distinguishes skin colonizing from infection-associated <i>Cutibacterium acnes</i> isolates.","authors":"Andreas Podbielski, Thomas Köller, Philipp Warnke, Israel Barrantes, Bernd Kreikemeyer","doi":"10.3389/fcimb.2024.1433783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong><i>Cutibacterium acnes</i> can both be a helpful colonizer of the human skin as well as the causative agent of acne and purulent infections. Until today, it is a moot point whether there are <i>C. acnes</i> strains exclusively devoted to be part of the skin microbiome and others, that carry special features enabling them to cause disease. So far, the search for the molecular background of such diverse behavior has led to inconsistent results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the present study, we prospectively collected <i>C. acnes</i> strains from 27 infected persons and 18 healthy controls employing rigid selection criteria to ensure their role as infectious agent or colonizer. The genome sequences from these strains were obtained and carefully controlled for quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Deduced traditional phylotyping assigned almost all superficial isolates to type IA1, while the clinical strains were evenly distributed between types IA1, IB, and II. Single locus sequence typing (SLST) showed a predominance of A1 type for the control strains, whereas 56% of the clinical isolates belonged to types A1, H1 and K8. Pangenome analysis from all the present strains and 30 published genomes indicated the presence of an open pangenome. Except for three isolates, the colonizing strains clustered in clades separate from the majority of clinical strains, while 4 clinical strains clustered with the control strains. Identical results were obtained by a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis. However, there were no significant differences in virulence gene contents in both groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) from both the pangenome and SNP data consistently showed genomic differences between both groups located in metabolic pathway and DNA repair genes. Thus, the different behavior of colonizing and infectious C. acnes strains could be due to special metabolic capacities or flexibilities rather than specific virulence traits.</p>","PeriodicalId":12458,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1433783","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cutibacterium acnes can both be a helpful colonizer of the human skin as well as the causative agent of acne and purulent infections. Until today, it is a moot point whether there are C. acnes strains exclusively devoted to be part of the skin microbiome and others, that carry special features enabling them to cause disease. So far, the search for the molecular background of such diverse behavior has led to inconsistent results.

Methods: In the present study, we prospectively collected C. acnes strains from 27 infected persons and 18 healthy controls employing rigid selection criteria to ensure their role as infectious agent or colonizer. The genome sequences from these strains were obtained and carefully controlled for quality.

Results: Deduced traditional phylotyping assigned almost all superficial isolates to type IA1, while the clinical strains were evenly distributed between types IA1, IB, and II. Single locus sequence typing (SLST) showed a predominance of A1 type for the control strains, whereas 56% of the clinical isolates belonged to types A1, H1 and K8. Pangenome analysis from all the present strains and 30 published genomes indicated the presence of an open pangenome. Except for three isolates, the colonizing strains clustered in clades separate from the majority of clinical strains, while 4 clinical strains clustered with the control strains. Identical results were obtained by a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis. However, there were no significant differences in virulence gene contents in both groups.

Discussion: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) from both the pangenome and SNP data consistently showed genomic differences between both groups located in metabolic pathway and DNA repair genes. Thus, the different behavior of colonizing and infectious C. acnes strains could be due to special metabolic capacities or flexibilities rather than specific virulence traits.

全基因组测序可区分皮肤定植型痤疮杆菌和感染相关型痤疮杆菌。
导言:痤疮丙酸杆菌既是人体皮肤的有益定植菌,也是痤疮和化脓性感染的致病菌。直到今天,是否有痤疮丙酸杆菌菌株专门成为皮肤微生物组的一部分,以及是否有其他菌株具有使其能够致病的特殊特征,仍是一个悬而未决的问题。迄今为止,对这种不同行为的分子背景的研究结果并不一致:在本研究中,我们前瞻性地从 27 名感染者和 18 名健康对照者身上收集了痤疮丙酸杆菌菌株,并采用严格的筛选标准来确保它们是传染源还是定植菌。我们获得了这些菌株的基因组序列,并对其质量进行了严格控制:结果:推断出的传统系统分型将几乎所有浅表分离株归入 IA1 型,而临床菌株则均匀分布在 IA1、IB 和 II 型之间。单基因座序列分型(SLST)显示,对照菌株以 A1 型为主,而 56% 的临床分离株属于 A1、H1 和 K8 型。对所有现有菌株和 30 个已发表的基因组进行的泛基因组分析表明,存在开放的泛基因组。除 3 株菌株外,定植菌株与大多数临床菌株分属不同的支系,而 4 株临床菌株则与对照菌株分属不同的支系。通过单核苷酸多态性(SNP)分析得出了相同的结果。但是,两组的毒力基因含量没有明显差异:讨论:通过庞基因组和 SNP 数据进行的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)一致显示,两组在代谢途径和 DNA 修复基因方面存在基因组差异。因此,痤疮丙酸杆菌定植株和感染株的不同行为可能是由于特殊的代谢能力或灵活性,而不是特定的毒力特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
1817
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology is a leading specialty journal, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across all pathogenic microorganisms and their interaction with their hosts. Chief Editor Yousef Abu Kwaik, University of Louisville is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology includes research on bacteria, fungi, parasites, viruses, endosymbionts, prions and all microbial pathogens as well as the microbiota and its effect on health and disease in various hosts. The research approaches include molecular microbiology, cellular microbiology, gene regulation, proteomics, signal transduction, pathogenic evolution, genomics, structural biology, and virulence factors as well as model hosts. Areas of research to counteract infectious agents by the host include the host innate and adaptive immune responses as well as metabolic restrictions to various pathogenic microorganisms, vaccine design and development against various pathogenic microorganisms, and the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance and its countermeasures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信