Efficacy of Static Magnetic Field Therapy on Pain Intensity, Functional Disability, Sleep Quality and Depressive Symptoms in Patients with Mechanical Neck and Low Back Pain.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Onur Serdar Gencler, Duran Berker Cemil
{"title":"Efficacy of Static Magnetic Field Therapy on Pain Intensity, Functional Disability, Sleep Quality and Depressive Symptoms in Patients with Mechanical Neck and Low Back Pain.","authors":"Onur Serdar Gencler, Duran Berker Cemil","doi":"10.1159/000542327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mechanical neck pain (MNP) and mechanical low back pain (MLBP) can have a negative impact on the quality of life of patients and may be associated with high levels of disability. Magnetic field therapy has been using in the treatment of various diseases. This study was conducted to assess the effects of Static Magnetic Field (SMF) therapy generated by neodymium magnets in patients with MNP and MLBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover study, patients with MNP and MLBP were randomly assigned to either the magnetic band or sham band treatment groups. After the initial 2-week phase (with participants randomly assigned to either treatment or sham-control), both groups underwent a 1-week washout period. Subsequently, the groups were swapped and proceeded with a second 2-week phase. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) were used to evaluate the patients' pain severity, functional disability, sleep quality, and levels of depressive symptoms, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 30 subjects, 17 (56.7%) had MLBP, whereas 13 (43.3%) had MNP. Magnetic band treatment (MBT) resulted in a significant decrease in the VAS score (p < 0.001) in all patients. MBT led to a significant decrease in the ODI score (p = 0.009) in patients with MLBP. A significant decrease in the NDI score was found in MBT (p < 0.001) in patients with MNP. The improvement in ISI and PHQ-9 scores was also significantly higher in MBT (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with MNP and MLBP who have not experienced sufficient benefits from conventional treatments, neodymium magnets can be considered as an alternative treatment option due to their significant properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":10541,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Medicine Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mechanical neck pain (MNP) and mechanical low back pain (MLBP) can have a negative impact on the quality of life of patients and may be associated with high levels of disability. Magnetic field therapy has been using in the treatment of various diseases. This study was conducted to assess the effects of Static Magnetic Field (SMF) therapy generated by neodymium magnets in patients with MNP and MLBP.

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover study, patients with MNP and MLBP were randomly assigned to either the magnetic band or sham band treatment groups. After the initial 2-week phase (with participants randomly assigned to either treatment or sham-control), both groups underwent a 1-week washout period. Subsequently, the groups were swapped and proceeded with a second 2-week phase. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) were used to evaluate the patients' pain severity, functional disability, sleep quality, and levels of depressive symptoms, respectively.

Results: Of the 30 subjects, 17 (56.7%) had MLBP, whereas 13 (43.3%) had MNP. Magnetic band treatment (MBT) resulted in a significant decrease in the VAS score (p < 0.001) in all patients. MBT led to a significant decrease in the ODI score (p = 0.009) in patients with MLBP. A significant decrease in the NDI score was found in MBT (p < 0.001) in patients with MNP. The improvement in ISI and PHQ-9 scores was also significantly higher in MBT (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: For patients with MNP and MLBP who have not experienced sufficient benefits from conventional treatments, neodymium magnets can be considered as an alternative treatment option due to their significant properties.

静态磁场疗法对机械性颈痛和腰痛患者的疼痛强度、功能障碍、睡眠质量和抑郁症状的疗效。
简介机械性颈痛(MNP)和机械性腰背痛(MLBP)会对患者的生活质量产生负面影响,并可能导致高度残疾。磁场疗法已被用于治疗各种疾病。本研究旨在评估由钕磁铁产生的静态磁场疗法(SMF)对 MNP 和 MLBP 患者的影响:在这项随机、双盲、假对照、交叉研究中,MNP 和 MLBP 患者被随机分配到磁带或假磁带治疗组。在为期两周的初始阶段(参与者被随机分配到治疗组或假对照组)后,两组患者都经历了为期一周的冲洗期。随后,两组对调,进行第二个为期两周的阶段。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry 腰痛残疾问卷(ODI)、颈部残疾指数(NDI)、失眠严重程度指数(ISI)和患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)分别评估患者的疼痛严重程度、功能障碍、睡眠质量和抑郁症状水平:30名受试者中,17人(56.7%)患有MLBP,13人(43.3%)患有MNP。磁带治疗(MBT)使所有患者的 VAS 评分显著下降(p < 0.001)。磁带治疗使 MLBP 患者的 ODI 评分明显下降(p = 0.009)。MNP患者的MBT使NDI评分明显下降(p < 0.001)。MBT患者的ISI和PHQ-9评分也有明显改善(p < 0.001):结论:对于传统治疗方法疗效不佳的颅内压增高症和颅内压增高症患者,钕磁铁因其显著的特性,可被视为一种替代治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complementary Medicine Research
Complementary Medicine Research Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope ''Complementary Medicine Research'' is an international journal that aims to bridge the gap between conventional medicine and complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) on a sound scientific basis, promoting their mutual integration. Accordingly, experts of both conventional medicine and CAM medicine cooperate on the journal‘s editorial board, which accepts papers only after a rigorous peer-review process in order to maintain a high standard of scientific quality. Spectrum of ''Complementary Medicine Research'': - Review and Original Articles, Case Reports and Essays regarding complementary practice and methods - Journal Club: Analysis and discussion of internationally published articles in complementary medicine - Editorials of leading experts in complementary medicine - Questions of complementary patient-centered care - Education in complementary medicine - Reports on important meetings and conferences - Society Bulletins of Schweizerische Medizinische Gesellschaft für Phytotherapie (SMGP) and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Naturheilkunde Bibliographic Details Complementary Medicine Research Journal Abbreviation: Complement Med Res ISSN: 2504-2092 (Print) e-ISSN: 2504-2106 (Online) DOI: 10.1159/issn.2504-2092 www.karger.com/CMR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信