The value of umbilical cord insertion site sampling in detecting maternal and/or fetal inflammatory response.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Apmis Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1111/apm.13496
Yin Ping Wong, Geok Chin Tan, T Yee Khong
{"title":"The value of umbilical cord insertion site sampling in detecting maternal and/or fetal inflammatory response.","authors":"Yin Ping Wong, Geok Chin Tan, T Yee Khong","doi":"10.1111/apm.13496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 2016 Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement recommends sampling a block of the placenta close to the umbilical cord insertion site (UCIB) for histopathological evaluation. This piece of placenta at the umbilical cord insertion is presumed to give a better yield of inflammation (if present). We aimed to investigate the utility of the UCIB in the detection of maternal and/or fetal inflammatory responses (MIR and/or FIR), in comparison with the other sections of the placental parenchyma. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study including all placentas with histologic chorioamnionitis. The histopathological slides of placentas were reviewed as per Amsterdam consensus guidelines. Diagnostic performance of UCIB in identifying MIR and/or FIR, relative to the other placental sections, was assessed. UCIB revealed diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of 79.2% (95% CI: 74.2-83.6%), 100.0% (95% CI: 95.6-100.0%), and 83.6% (95% CI: 79.5-87.2%), respectively, in the detection of FIR, while showing a low sensitivity of 52.6% (95% CI: 47.5-57.6%) in detecting MIR. In 59 (24.6%) cases, FIR was not seen in the corresponding placental parenchymal sections but was detected in the UCIBs. This study is the first study to confirm that a section from the UCIB is essential for the detection of FIR, which affirms the Amsterdam consensus sampling recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8167,"journal":{"name":"Apmis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apmis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.13496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2016 Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement recommends sampling a block of the placenta close to the umbilical cord insertion site (UCIB) for histopathological evaluation. This piece of placenta at the umbilical cord insertion is presumed to give a better yield of inflammation (if present). We aimed to investigate the utility of the UCIB in the detection of maternal and/or fetal inflammatory responses (MIR and/or FIR), in comparison with the other sections of the placental parenchyma. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study including all placentas with histologic chorioamnionitis. The histopathological slides of placentas were reviewed as per Amsterdam consensus guidelines. Diagnostic performance of UCIB in identifying MIR and/or FIR, relative to the other placental sections, was assessed. UCIB revealed diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of 79.2% (95% CI: 74.2-83.6%), 100.0% (95% CI: 95.6-100.0%), and 83.6% (95% CI: 79.5-87.2%), respectively, in the detection of FIR, while showing a low sensitivity of 52.6% (95% CI: 47.5-57.6%) in detecting MIR. In 59 (24.6%) cases, FIR was not seen in the corresponding placental parenchymal sections but was detected in the UCIBs. This study is the first study to confirm that a section from the UCIB is essential for the detection of FIR, which affirms the Amsterdam consensus sampling recommendations.

脐带插入部位取样在检测母体和/或胎儿炎症反应中的价值。
2016 年阿姆斯特丹胎盘工作小组共识声明建议在靠近脐带插入部位(UCIB)的胎盘块取样进行组织病理学评估。脐带插入处的这块胎盘被认为能更好地显示炎症(如果存在)。我们的目的是研究 UCIB 在检测母体和/或胎儿炎症反应(MIR 和/或 FIR)方面的作用,并与胎盘实质的其他切片进行比较。这是一项回顾性横断面研究,包括所有患有组织学绒毛膜羊膜炎的胎盘。根据阿姆斯特丹共识指南对胎盘组织病理学切片进行了审查。评估了 UCIB 在鉴别 MIR 和/或 FIR 方面相对于其他胎盘切片的诊断性能。UCIB在检测FIR方面的诊断敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性分别为79.2%(95% CI:74.2-83.6%)、100.0%(95% CI:95.6-100.0%)和83.6%(95% CI:79.5-87.2%),而在检测MIR方面的敏感性较低,仅为52.6%(95% CI:47.5-57.6%)。在 59 个(24.6%)病例中,FIR 在相应的胎盘实质切片中未见,但在 UCIB 中被检测到。该研究首次证实了 UCIB 切片对检测 FIR 至关重要,这也是对阿姆斯特丹共识取样建议的肯定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Apmis
Apmis 医学-病理学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: APMIS, formerly Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica, has been published since 1924 by the Scandinavian Societies for Medical Microbiology and Pathology as a non-profit-making scientific journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信