Competency-based medical education in interventional pulmonology: current state and future opportunities.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1097/MCP.0000000000001128
Logan J Hostetter, Darlene R Nelson
{"title":"Competency-based medical education in interventional pulmonology: current state and future opportunities.","authors":"Logan J Hostetter, Darlene R Nelson","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This chapter examines the evolution and current status of competency-based medical education (CBME) in interventional pulmonology, focusing on procedural skills assessment and training.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Traditionally, interventional pulmonology training has used an apprenticeship model with case logs and director attestation, leading to inconsistent outcomes due to a lack of standardized curricula. CBME, established to address these issues, relies on outcome-based assessments to ensure trainees achieve necessary competencies. The chapter reviews various assessment tools, including global rating scales, checklists, and simulation-based methods, and their effectiveness in skill acquisition and clinical evaluation. It also covers specific procedures such as EBUS-TBNA, electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy, and rigid bronchoscopy, discussing their assessment tools and learning curves. The chapter emphasizes the need for standardized assessment tools and suggests using entrustable professional activities (EPAs) to improve competency evaluation. Future directions include integrating real-time artificial intelligence feedback, addressing high-risk low-volume procedures, and enhancing workplace-based assessments to improve interventional pulmonology training and patient care quality.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This chapter reviews the transition from traditional apprenticeship models to CBME in interventional pulmonology, highlighting advancements in procedural skills assessment, the effectiveness of various assessment tools, and future directions for improving training and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"65-71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This chapter examines the evolution and current status of competency-based medical education (CBME) in interventional pulmonology, focusing on procedural skills assessment and training.

Recent findings: Traditionally, interventional pulmonology training has used an apprenticeship model with case logs and director attestation, leading to inconsistent outcomes due to a lack of standardized curricula. CBME, established to address these issues, relies on outcome-based assessments to ensure trainees achieve necessary competencies. The chapter reviews various assessment tools, including global rating scales, checklists, and simulation-based methods, and their effectiveness in skill acquisition and clinical evaluation. It also covers specific procedures such as EBUS-TBNA, electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy, and rigid bronchoscopy, discussing their assessment tools and learning curves. The chapter emphasizes the need for standardized assessment tools and suggests using entrustable professional activities (EPAs) to improve competency evaluation. Future directions include integrating real-time artificial intelligence feedback, addressing high-risk low-volume procedures, and enhancing workplace-based assessments to improve interventional pulmonology training and patient care quality.

Summary: This chapter reviews the transition from traditional apprenticeship models to CBME in interventional pulmonology, highlighting advancements in procedural skills assessment, the effectiveness of various assessment tools, and future directions for improving training and patient care.

介入性肺病学的能力本位医学教育:现状与未来机遇。
综述目的:本章探讨了介入性肺病学以能力为基础的医学教育(CBME)的演变和现状,重点是程序技能评估和培训:传统上,介入肺脏病学培训采用病例记录和主任证明的学徒模式,由于缺乏标准化课程,导致培训结果不一致。为解决这些问题而设立的 CBME 依靠基于结果的评估来确保学员达到必要的能力要求。本章回顾了各种评估工具,包括全球评分量表、核对表和模拟方法,以及它们在技能学习和临床评估中的有效性。本章还涉及 EBUS-TBNA、电磁导航支气管镜和硬质支气管镜等特定手术,讨论了它们的评估工具和学习曲线。本章强调了标准化评估工具的必要性,并建议使用可委托的专业活动(EPA)来改进能力评估。未来的方向包括整合实时人工智能反馈、解决高风险低容量手术以及加强基于工作场所的评估,以改善介入性肺病学培训和患者护理质量。摘要:本章回顾了介入性肺病学从传统学徒模式向 CBME 的转变,重点介绍了手术技能评估的进展、各种评估工具的有效性以及改善培训和患者护理的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews, covering key subjects such as asthma; cystic fibrosis; infectious diseases; diseases of the pleura; and sleep and respiratory neurobiology. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the pulmonary field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信