Encoding of global visual motion in the avian pretectum shifts from a bias for temporal-to-nasal selectivity to omnidirectional excitation across speeds.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
eNeuro Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0301-24.2024
Suryadeep Dash, Vikram B Baliga, Anthony B Lapsansky, Douglas R Wylie, Douglas L Altshuler
{"title":"Encoding of global visual motion in the avian pretectum shifts from a bias for temporal-to-nasal selectivity to omnidirectional excitation across speeds.","authors":"Suryadeep Dash, Vikram B Baliga, Anthony B Lapsansky, Douglas R Wylie, Douglas L Altshuler","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0301-24.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pretectum of vertebrates contains neurons responsive to global visual motion. These signals are sent to the cerebellum, forming a subcortical pathway for processing optic flow. Global motion neurons exhibit selectivity for both direction and speed, but this is usually assessed by first determining direction preference at intermediate velocity (16-32 deg/sec), and then assessing speed tuning at the preferred direction. A consequence of this approach is that it is unknown if and how direction preference changes with speed. We measured directional selectivity in 114 pretectal neurons from 44 zebra finches (<i>Taeniopygia guttata</i>) across spatial and temporal frequencies, corresponding to a speed range of 0.062 to 1024°/s. Pretectal neurons were most responsive at 32-64°/s with lower activity as speed increased or decreased. At each speed, we determined if cells were directionally-selective, bidirectionally-selective, omnidirectionally responsive, or unmodulated. Notably, at 32°/s, 60% of the cells were directionally selective and 28% were omnidirectionally responsive. In contrast, at 1024°/s, 20% of the cells were directionally selective and nearly half of the population was omnidirectionally responsive. Only 15% of the cells were omnidirectionally excited across most speeds. The remaining 85% of the cells had direction tuning that changed with speed. Collectively, these results indicate a shift from a bias for directional tuning at intermediate speeds of global visual motion to a bias for omnidirectional responses at faster speeds. These results suggest a potential role for the pretectum during flight by detecting unexpected drift or potentials collisions, depending on the speed of the optic flow signal.<b>Significance Statement</b> During locomotion, images of edges and surfaces in the environment move across the retina, a signal of global visual motion called optic flow. Retinal recipient areas in the accessory optic system and the pretectum are the earliest sites to encode this signal, and the neurons are selective for direction and speed. Previous work suggested that directional selectivity may change across speeds but this has never been systematically studied. We measured direction preferences from 0.062 to 1024°/s in the avian pretectum. We found that pretectal global motion neurons are biased for temporal-to-nasal motion at intermediate speeds but biased for omnidirectional responses at faster speeds. These results suggest the pretectum could function to detect both unexpected drift and potential collisions during locomotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0301-24.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pretectum of vertebrates contains neurons responsive to global visual motion. These signals are sent to the cerebellum, forming a subcortical pathway for processing optic flow. Global motion neurons exhibit selectivity for both direction and speed, but this is usually assessed by first determining direction preference at intermediate velocity (16-32 deg/sec), and then assessing speed tuning at the preferred direction. A consequence of this approach is that it is unknown if and how direction preference changes with speed. We measured directional selectivity in 114 pretectal neurons from 44 zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) across spatial and temporal frequencies, corresponding to a speed range of 0.062 to 1024°/s. Pretectal neurons were most responsive at 32-64°/s with lower activity as speed increased or decreased. At each speed, we determined if cells were directionally-selective, bidirectionally-selective, omnidirectionally responsive, or unmodulated. Notably, at 32°/s, 60% of the cells were directionally selective and 28% were omnidirectionally responsive. In contrast, at 1024°/s, 20% of the cells were directionally selective and nearly half of the population was omnidirectionally responsive. Only 15% of the cells were omnidirectionally excited across most speeds. The remaining 85% of the cells had direction tuning that changed with speed. Collectively, these results indicate a shift from a bias for directional tuning at intermediate speeds of global visual motion to a bias for omnidirectional responses at faster speeds. These results suggest a potential role for the pretectum during flight by detecting unexpected drift or potentials collisions, depending on the speed of the optic flow signal.Significance Statement During locomotion, images of edges and surfaces in the environment move across the retina, a signal of global visual motion called optic flow. Retinal recipient areas in the accessory optic system and the pretectum are the earliest sites to encode this signal, and the neurons are selective for direction and speed. Previous work suggested that directional selectivity may change across speeds but this has never been systematically studied. We measured direction preferences from 0.062 to 1024°/s in the avian pretectum. We found that pretectal global motion neurons are biased for temporal-to-nasal motion at intermediate speeds but biased for omnidirectional responses at faster speeds. These results suggest the pretectum could function to detect both unexpected drift and potential collisions during locomotion.

鸟类前庭对全局视觉运动的编码从偏重时间到鼻腔的选择性转变为跨速度的全方位兴奋。
脊椎动物的前叶中含有对整体视觉运动做出反应的神经元。这些信号被发送到小脑,形成处理视流的皮层下通路。全局运动神经元对方向和速度都有选择性,但通常是先确定中等速度(16-32 度/秒)下的方向偏好,然后评估偏好方向的速度调谐。这种方法的一个后果是,人们不知道方向偏好是否以及如何随着速度的变化而变化。我们测量了 44 只斑马雀(Taeniopygia guttata)的 114 个直觉前神经元在空间和时间频率上的方向选择性,对应的速度范围为 0.062 至 1024°/秒。在速度为 32-64°/s 时,直觉前叶神经元的反应最为灵敏,随着速度的增减,神经元的活动也随之降低。在每种速度下,我们都要确定细胞是具有方向选择性、双向选择性、全向响应性还是无调制。值得注意的是,在速度为 32°/s 时,60% 的细胞具有方向选择性,28% 的细胞具有全向反应性。相比之下,当速度为 1024°/s 时,20% 的细胞具有方向选择性,近一半的细胞具有全向响应性。在大多数速度下,只有 15%的细胞具有全向兴奋性。其余 85% 的细胞具有随速度变化的方向调谐。总之,这些结果表明,在全局视觉运动的中等速度下,方向调谐偏向于全向反应,而在较快速度下,方向调谐偏向于全向反应。这些结果表明,前视网膜在飞行过程中的潜在作用是检测意外漂移或潜在碰撞,这取决于视流信号的速度。 重要意义 声明 在运动过程中,环境中边缘和表面的图像在视网膜上移动,这是一种称为视流的全局视觉运动信号。附属视觉系统和前视网膜的视网膜受区是最早对这一信号进行编码的部位,这些神经元对方向和速度具有选择性。之前的研究表明,方向选择性可能会随着速度的变化而变化,但这一点从未被系统地研究过。我们测量了鸟类直觉前叶从 0.062 到 1024°/s 的方向选择性。我们发现,在中等速度下,前突全运动神经元偏向于从时间到鼻腔的运动,而在较快速度下则偏向于全向反应。这些结果表明,前突能检测运动过程中的意外漂移和潜在碰撞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
eNeuro
eNeuro Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
486
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信