Ediacaran origin and Ediacaran-Cambrian diversification of Metazoa

IF 3.5 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Emily Carlisle, Zongjun Yin, Davide Pisani, Philip C. J. Donoghue
{"title":"Ediacaran origin and Ediacaran-Cambrian diversification of Metazoa","authors":"Emily Carlisle, Zongjun Yin, Davide Pisani, Philip C. J. Donoghue","doi":"10.1126/sciadv.adp7161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The timescale of animal diversification has been a focus of debate over how evolutionary history should be calibrated to geologic time. Molecular clock analyses have invariably estimated a Cryogenian or Tonian origin of animals while unequivocal animal fossils first occur in the Ediacaran. However, redating of key Ediacaran biotas and the discovery of several Ediacaran crown-Metazoa prompt recalibration of molecular clock analyses. We present revised fossil calibrations and use them in molecular clock analyses estimating the timescale of metazoan evolutionary history. Integrating across uncertainties including phylogenetic relationships, clock model, and calibration strategy, we estimate Metazoa to have originated in the early Ediacaran, Eumetazoa in the middle Ediacaran, and Bilateria in the upper Ediacaran, with many crown-phyla originating across the Ediacaran-Cambrian interval or elsewise fully within the Cambrian. These results are in much closer accord with the fossil record, coinciding with marine oxygenation, but they reject a literal reading of the fossil record.","PeriodicalId":11,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Chemical Biology","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adp7161","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The timescale of animal diversification has been a focus of debate over how evolutionary history should be calibrated to geologic time. Molecular clock analyses have invariably estimated a Cryogenian or Tonian origin of animals while unequivocal animal fossils first occur in the Ediacaran. However, redating of key Ediacaran biotas and the discovery of several Ediacaran crown-Metazoa prompt recalibration of molecular clock analyses. We present revised fossil calibrations and use them in molecular clock analyses estimating the timescale of metazoan evolutionary history. Integrating across uncertainties including phylogenetic relationships, clock model, and calibration strategy, we estimate Metazoa to have originated in the early Ediacaran, Eumetazoa in the middle Ediacaran, and Bilateria in the upper Ediacaran, with many crown-phyla originating across the Ediacaran-Cambrian interval or elsewise fully within the Cambrian. These results are in much closer accord with the fossil record, coinciding with marine oxygenation, but they reject a literal reading of the fossil record.
埃迪卡拉纪起源和埃迪卡拉-寒武纪元古宙的多样化
动物多样化的时间尺度一直是进化史如何与地质年代校准的争论焦点。分子钟分析无一例外地估计动物起源于冷元纪或托尼纪,而明确的动物化石则首次出现在埃迪卡拉纪。然而,对埃迪卡拉纪主要生物群落的重新定年以及几种埃迪卡拉纪冠网藻类的发现,促使对分子钟分析进行重新校准。我们提出了经修订的化石定标,并将其用于分子钟分析,以估计元古宙进化史的时间尺度。综合系统发育关系、时钟模型和校准策略等各种不确定因素,我们估计元古宙起源于埃迪卡拉纪早期,真尾目起源于埃迪卡拉纪中期,双足目起源于埃迪卡拉纪上期,许多冠叠体起源于埃迪卡拉纪-寒武纪之间,或完全起源于寒武纪。这些结果与化石记录更为吻合,与海洋含氧化相吻合,但它们否定了对化石记录的字面解读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Chemical Biology
ACS Chemical Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
353
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: ACS Chemical Biology provides an international forum for the rapid communication of research that broadly embraces the interface between chemistry and biology. The journal also serves as a forum to facilitate the communication between biologists and chemists that will translate into new research opportunities and discoveries. Results will be published in which molecular reasoning has been used to probe questions through in vitro investigations, cell biological methods, or organismic studies. We welcome mechanistic studies on proteins, nucleic acids, sugars, lipids, and nonbiological polymers. The journal serves a large scientific community, exploring cellular function from both chemical and biological perspectives. It is understood that submitted work is based upon original results and has not been published previously.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信