A Systematic Review of Parent Socialization of Negative Affect in Clinical Child Samples: Relations to Youth Emotion Regulation Abilities

IF 5.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Katelyn M. Garcia, Delshad M. Shroff, Ainsley Patrick, Thomas H. Ollendick, Rosanna Breaux
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Parent Socialization of Negative Affect in Clinical Child Samples: Relations to Youth Emotion Regulation Abilities","authors":"Katelyn M. Garcia, Delshad M. Shroff, Ainsley Patrick, Thomas H. Ollendick, Rosanna Breaux","doi":"10.1007/s10567-024-00508-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Emotion-focused parenting practices, known as parent emotion socialization, play a crucial role in shaping youth’s emotion regulation (ER) abilities. The impact of parent emotion socialization behaviors (ESB) on youth ER has been studied extensively in community samples. However, research on these relations in clinical samples is more limited, albeit growing. The current systematic review sought to evaluate the existing literature examining parent ESB of negative affect in various clinical child and adolescent samples. A literature search was conducted in April 2023, resulting in 1153 abstracts being reviewed. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts to identify relevant papers, with 152 articles being independently reviewed in full, of which 26 articles met inclusion criteria and are included in the current review. Studies (16 cross-sectional, 6 longitudinal, 4 intervention) utilized multi-methods of assessing youth ER, including questionnaires, physiological, and observational measures in a range of clinical samples, including youth diagnosed with internalizing, externalizing, and neurodevelopmental disorders, as well as youth at-risk for clinical diagnoses such as physically abused children. Overall, results support significant, negative associations between parent ESB practices and youth emotion dysregulation (<i>r</i>s = .22–.35) and negativity/lability (<i>r</i>s = .19–.60), and positive associations with youth ER abilities (<i>r</i>s = .18–.76). Some studies highlighted varying impacts of parental ESB on children with versus without clinical disorders/symptomology, with effects being more pronounced within clinical populations. Implications for these findings and future research directions are discussed, including the significance of focusing on parent ESB in intervention work with clinical child populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-024-00508-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emotion-focused parenting practices, known as parent emotion socialization, play a crucial role in shaping youth’s emotion regulation (ER) abilities. The impact of parent emotion socialization behaviors (ESB) on youth ER has been studied extensively in community samples. However, research on these relations in clinical samples is more limited, albeit growing. The current systematic review sought to evaluate the existing literature examining parent ESB of negative affect in various clinical child and adolescent samples. A literature search was conducted in April 2023, resulting in 1153 abstracts being reviewed. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts to identify relevant papers, with 152 articles being independently reviewed in full, of which 26 articles met inclusion criteria and are included in the current review. Studies (16 cross-sectional, 6 longitudinal, 4 intervention) utilized multi-methods of assessing youth ER, including questionnaires, physiological, and observational measures in a range of clinical samples, including youth diagnosed with internalizing, externalizing, and neurodevelopmental disorders, as well as youth at-risk for clinical diagnoses such as physically abused children. Overall, results support significant, negative associations between parent ESB practices and youth emotion dysregulation (rs = .22–.35) and negativity/lability (rs = .19–.60), and positive associations with youth ER abilities (rs = .18–.76). Some studies highlighted varying impacts of parental ESB on children with versus without clinical disorders/symptomology, with effects being more pronounced within clinical populations. Implications for these findings and future research directions are discussed, including the significance of focusing on parent ESB in intervention work with clinical child populations.

临床儿童样本中父母消极情绪社会化的系统回顾:与青少年情绪调节能力的关系
以情感为重点的养育方式,即父母的情感社会化,在塑造青少年的情感调节(ER)能力方面起着至关重要的作用。父母情绪社会化行为(ESB)对青少年情绪调节能力的影响已在社区样本中进行了广泛研究。然而,在临床样本中,有关这些关系的研究虽然在不断增加,但却较为有限。本系统性综述旨在评估现有文献,研究父母在各种临床儿童和青少年样本中的负面情绪社会化行为。我们于 2023 年 4 月进行了文献检索,共审查了 1153 篇摘要。两名审稿人分别独立筛选了标题和摘要,以确定相关论文,共独立审阅了 152 篇文章的全文,其中 26 篇文章符合纳入标准,被纳入本次综述。这些研究(16 篇横断面研究、6 篇纵向研究、4 篇干预研究)采用了多种方法评估青少年急迫感,包括对一系列临床样本进行问卷调查、生理测量和观察测量,这些临床样本包括被诊断为内化、外化和神经发育障碍的青少年,以及被诊断为临床风险的青少年,如遭受身体虐待的儿童。总体而言,研究结果表明,父母的 ESB 实践与青少年情绪失调(rs = .22-.35)和消极/易怒(rs = .19-.60)之间存在明显的负相关,而与青少年的 ER 能力(rs = .18-.76)之间存在正相关。一些研究强调了父母ESB对有临床障碍/症状和无临床障碍/症状儿童的不同影响,在临床人群中影响更为明显。本文讨论了这些发现的意义和未来的研究方向,包括在临床儿童群体的干预工作中关注父母 ESB 的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Editors-in-Chief: Dr. Ronald J. Prinz, University of South Carolina and Dr. Thomas H. Ollendick, Virginia Polytechnic Institute Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that provides an international, interdisciplinary forum in which important and new developments in this field are identified and in-depth reviews on current thought and practices are published. The Journal publishes original research reviews, conceptual and theoretical papers, and related work in the broad area of the behavioral sciences that pertains to infants, children, adolescents, and families. Contributions originate from a wide array of disciplines including, but not limited to, psychology (e.g., clinical, community, developmental, family, school), medicine (e.g., family practice, pediatrics, psychiatry), public health, social work, and education. Topical content includes science and application and covers facets of etiology, assessment, description, treatment and intervention, prevention, methodology, and public policy. Submissions are by invitation only and undergo peer review. The Editors, in consultation with the Editorial Board, invite highly qualified experts to contribute original papers on topics of timely interest and significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信