Seismic behavior of precast wall slab wall structure under near and far field earthquakes

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Shashiraj Shivling Chougule, Shiv Dayal Bharti, Mahendra Kumar Shrimali, Tushar Kanti Datta
{"title":"Seismic behavior of precast wall slab wall structure under near and far field earthquakes","authors":"Shashiraj Shivling Chougule,&nbsp;Shiv Dayal Bharti,&nbsp;Mahendra Kumar Shrimali,&nbsp;Tushar Kanti Datta","doi":"10.1007/s10518-024-02030-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Significant damages to precast wall-slab-wall (WSW) systems due to past earthquakes in near-field zones has been reported in the literature. This led to research on the seismic behavior of precast structures. Most of them concentrated on precast framed structures. Comparatively, fewer studies have been conducted on WSW systems, especially in exploring their performance in near-field earthquakes. This study focuses on the analysis of a 5-story precast WSW structure and the corresponding monolithic WSW structures under near-field (NF) and far-field (FF) earthquakes. The normalized backbone curves (M-θ curves) for precast and monolithic wall-slab connections were modeled using link elements at the slab-wall interface. A default plastic hinge is assigned at a distance of 0.1 L from the slab-wall interface. Three types of earthquakes were considered: far-field (FF), near-field forward directivity (NFD), and near-field fling step effect (NFFE). Nonlinear time history analysis (NLTHA) is performed in the computer program SAP2000 using an ensemble of 7 different earthquake records for each type. The earthquake records are normalized for three levels of peak ground acceleration (PGA): 0.4 g, 0.6 g, and 0.8 g. The responses of interest include top story displacement (TSD), maximum inter-story drift ratio (MIDR), base shear (BS), and maximum acceleration (MA). Comparative studies utilized the ensemble average of responses. The findings reveal that the theoretical analysis of precast frames shows greater vulnerability compared to conventional monolithic frames (as commonly practiced without specifying M-θ curves at the slab-wall interface). Moreover, NFFE led to increased top story displacement and MIDR responses in all types of precast and monolithic WSW structures under study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"22 14","pages":"6991 - 7013"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-02030-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significant damages to precast wall-slab-wall (WSW) systems due to past earthquakes in near-field zones has been reported in the literature. This led to research on the seismic behavior of precast structures. Most of them concentrated on precast framed structures. Comparatively, fewer studies have been conducted on WSW systems, especially in exploring their performance in near-field earthquakes. This study focuses on the analysis of a 5-story precast WSW structure and the corresponding monolithic WSW structures under near-field (NF) and far-field (FF) earthquakes. The normalized backbone curves (M-θ curves) for precast and monolithic wall-slab connections were modeled using link elements at the slab-wall interface. A default plastic hinge is assigned at a distance of 0.1 L from the slab-wall interface. Three types of earthquakes were considered: far-field (FF), near-field forward directivity (NFD), and near-field fling step effect (NFFE). Nonlinear time history analysis (NLTHA) is performed in the computer program SAP2000 using an ensemble of 7 different earthquake records for each type. The earthquake records are normalized for three levels of peak ground acceleration (PGA): 0.4 g, 0.6 g, and 0.8 g. The responses of interest include top story displacement (TSD), maximum inter-story drift ratio (MIDR), base shear (BS), and maximum acceleration (MA). Comparative studies utilized the ensemble average of responses. The findings reveal that the theoretical analysis of precast frames shows greater vulnerability compared to conventional monolithic frames (as commonly practiced without specifying M-θ curves at the slab-wall interface). Moreover, NFFE led to increased top story displacement and MIDR responses in all types of precast and monolithic WSW structures under study.

Abstract Image

预制墙板结构在近场和远场地震下的抗震行为
据文献报道,过去在近震区发生的地震对预制墙-板-墙(WSW)系统造成了严重破坏。这引发了对预制结构抗震行为的研究。这些研究大多集中在预制框架结构上。相比较而言,关于 WSW 系统的研究较少,尤其是在探索其在近场地震中的性能方面。本研究重点分析了近场(NF)和远场(FF)地震下的 5 层预制 WSW 结构和相应的整体 WSW 结构。预制和整体式墙-板连接的归一化主干曲线(M-θ 曲线)是使用板-墙界面上的链接单元建模的。在距离板-墙界面 0.1 L 处设置了一个默认的塑性铰链。考虑了三种类型的地震:远场地震(FF)、近场前向指向性地震(NFD)和近场蛙跳效应地震(NFFE)。非线性时间历程分析(NLTHA)是在计算机程序 SAP2000 中使用每种类型的 7 种不同地震记录的集合进行的。地震记录按 0.4 g、0.6 g 和 0.8 g 三种峰值地面加速度 (PGA) 进行归一化处理。相关响应包括层顶位移 (TSD)、最大层间漂移比 (MIDR)、基底剪力 (BS) 和最大加速度 (MA)。比较研究采用了响应的集合平均值。研究结果表明,预制框架的理论分析与传统的整体框架(通常的做法是在板墙界面处不指定 M-θ 曲线)相比显示出更大的脆弱性。此外,在所研究的所有类型的预制和整体式 WSW 结构中,NFFE 导致顶层位移和 MIDR 响应增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信