Exploring the Nature-Creativity Connection Across Different Settings: A Scoping Review

IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Dianne A. Vella-Brodrick, Kelsey J. Lewis, Krystina Gilowska
{"title":"Exploring the Nature-Creativity Connection Across Different Settings: A Scoping Review","authors":"Dianne A. Vella-Brodrick, Kelsey J. Lewis, Krystina Gilowska","doi":"10.1007/s10648-024-09964-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The widespread benefits of creativity have become more salient in recent years. This has led to scholarly interest in finding ways to foster creativity. Nature immersion may be one way to enhance creativity, particularly as many individuals involved in creative pursuits have found nature to be a source of inspiration and a haven for restoration. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews and the PRISMA-ScR 22 item checklist, we conducted a scoping review to examine the evidence on the relationship between nature and creativity as well as any underlying mechanisms facilitating this relationship. A scoping review was deemed appropriate given the infancy of the topic and the need to understand the broad landscape. Our aim was to present a range of interdisciplinary applications of nature interventions on different types of creative performance. We found 45 publications exploring the relationship between nature and creativity, with the majority (<i>n</i> = 36, 80%) published within the past seven years. Overall, the quantitative studies in our scoping review provided evidence of a significant positive relationship, or effect, between nature and creativity. These relationships held across various types of nature including for wilderness, rural and urban settings, as well as in different applications of creativity such as in the arts, workplace, education, and laboratory conditions. Qualitative and case study research also supported the positive relationship between nature and creativity including in diverse nature settings and in different applications such as in visual arts, design, writing, music, free play in kindergartens, and work. Qualitative studies highlighted potential mechanisms behind this relationship, including time in solitude, appreciation of impermanence, relaxation and inspiration, and disconnection from technology. Moreover, the degree of exposure to nature may be an important consideration for creative performance with more immersive, real-life experiences typical of outdoor nature, tending to be more effective than indoor spaces with window views or indoor plants. These preliminary findings suggest that more opportunities to connect with nature, especially in the outdoors, may help to stimulate creativity in a wide range of settings including education, the creative arts, and workplaces, although more high-quality research examining the sustained effects of nature on creativity is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09964-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread benefits of creativity have become more salient in recent years. This has led to scholarly interest in finding ways to foster creativity. Nature immersion may be one way to enhance creativity, particularly as many individuals involved in creative pursuits have found nature to be a source of inspiration and a haven for restoration. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews and the PRISMA-ScR 22 item checklist, we conducted a scoping review to examine the evidence on the relationship between nature and creativity as well as any underlying mechanisms facilitating this relationship. A scoping review was deemed appropriate given the infancy of the topic and the need to understand the broad landscape. Our aim was to present a range of interdisciplinary applications of nature interventions on different types of creative performance. We found 45 publications exploring the relationship between nature and creativity, with the majority (n = 36, 80%) published within the past seven years. Overall, the quantitative studies in our scoping review provided evidence of a significant positive relationship, or effect, between nature and creativity. These relationships held across various types of nature including for wilderness, rural and urban settings, as well as in different applications of creativity such as in the arts, workplace, education, and laboratory conditions. Qualitative and case study research also supported the positive relationship between nature and creativity including in diverse nature settings and in different applications such as in visual arts, design, writing, music, free play in kindergartens, and work. Qualitative studies highlighted potential mechanisms behind this relationship, including time in solitude, appreciation of impermanence, relaxation and inspiration, and disconnection from technology. Moreover, the degree of exposure to nature may be an important consideration for creative performance with more immersive, real-life experiences typical of outdoor nature, tending to be more effective than indoor spaces with window views or indoor plants. These preliminary findings suggest that more opportunities to connect with nature, especially in the outdoors, may help to stimulate creativity in a wide range of settings including education, the creative arts, and workplaces, although more high-quality research examining the sustained effects of nature on creativity is needed.

探索不同环境下自然与创造力之间的联系:范围审查
近年来,创造力的广泛益处日益凸显。这引起了学者们对寻找培养创造力的方法的兴趣。沉浸大自然可能是提高创造力的一种方法,尤其是许多从事创造性工作的人都发现大自然是灵感的源泉和修复的天堂。我们采用系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)的范围界定综述扩展和 PRISMA-ScR 22 项检查表进行了范围界定综述,以研究自然与创造力之间关系的证据以及促进这种关系的潜在机制。鉴于该主题尚处于起步阶段,且需要了解广泛的情况,我们认为进行范围界定综述是合适的。我们的目的是介绍自然干预对不同类型创造性表现的一系列跨学科应用。我们发现了 45 篇探讨自然与创造力之间关系的出版物,其中大部分(n = 36,80%)是在过去七年内发表的。总体而言,我们的范围综述中的定量研究提供了证据,证明自然与创造力之间存在显著的正向关系或效应。这些关系适用于各种类型的自然环境,包括荒野、农村和城市环境,以及创造力的不同应用领域,如艺术、工作场所、教育和实验室条件。定性研究和案例研究也支持自然与创造力之间的积极关系,包括在不同的自然环境和不同的应用中,如视觉艺术、设计、写作、音乐、幼儿园的自由游戏和工作。定性研究强调了这种关系背后的潜在机制,包括独处的时间、欣赏无常、放松和灵感,以及与技术脱节。此外,接触大自然的程度也可能是影响创造性表现的一个重要因素,与窗外景色或室内植物的室内空间相比,户外大自然中典型的更身临其境、更真实的生活体验往往更有效。这些初步研究结果表明,在包括教育、创意艺术和工作场所在内的各种环境中,有更多机会与大自然(尤其是户外)建立联系可能有助于激发创造力,不过还需要更多高质量的研究来检验大自然对创造力的持续影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Psychology Review
Educational Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Educational Psychology Review aims to disseminate knowledge and promote dialogue within the field of educational psychology. It serves as a platform for the publication of various types of articles, including peer-reviewed integrative reviews, special thematic issues, reflections on previous research or new research directions, interviews, and research-based advice for practitioners. The journal caters to a diverse readership, ranging from generalists in educational psychology to experts in specific areas of the discipline. The content offers a comprehensive coverage of topics and provides in-depth information to meet the needs of both specialized researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信