The international community is failing to protect healthcare in armed conflict

Abstract

Regular attacks on health facilities, workers, and patients in conflicts are a devastating reality Since 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) has documented over 7400 attacks on healthcare in armed conflict across 21 countries and territories.1 WHO defines an attack on healthcare as any act of verbal, physical violence, obstruction, or threat of violence that interferes with the availability, access, and delivery of curative or preventive health services during emergencies. That translates to an average of three attacks a day, every day. The attacks have killed almost 2500 health workers, patients, and bystanders—one a day. To prevent and mitigate attacks on healthcare— one of the most disturbing aspects of today’s conflicts—we need renewed political, legal, diplomatic, and programmatic efforts. Attacks on healthcare are a global problem. While reporting is not exhaustive, most attacks over the past seven years have occurred in the occupied Palestinian territory, Ukraine, Democratic Republic of Congo, Myanmar, Afghanistan, and Syria.1 Despite clear prohibitions under international law, not one person has been held accountable for any of the over 7400 attacks documented by WHO. Historically, only a handful of cases have led to charges and prosecution. The message is clear—current laws, accountability mechanisms, and diplomatic efforts are proving ineffective at protecting healthcare in conflict.2 Impunity is the rule. And the public health implications are stark—attacks on healthcare severely disrupt access to life …