An Analysis of Published Synthetic Routes, Route Targets, and Reaction Types (2000–2020)

IF 3.1 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Samuel Genheden, Gareth P. Howell
{"title":"An Analysis of Published Synthetic Routes, Route Targets, and Reaction Types (2000–2020)","authors":"Samuel Genheden, Gareth P. Howell","doi":"10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a large data set (640k synthetic routes and 2.4m reactions) compiled from six popular journals between 2000 and 2020, trends are identified and discussed for topics including journal publishing rates, availability of machine-readable data, characteristics of synthetic route targets and starting materials (molecular weight, complexity, elemental composition, chirality, and ring systems), and the reaction classes utilized in these synthetic routes. We provide evidence of an ongoing shift away from large natural product or “total” syntheses among the academic data and a gradual increase in the size and complexity of industrial/medicinal target molecules. The reaction class analyses show key differences between the academic and industrial sectors and how a small number of reaction types have proliferated in the latter, giving rise to a possible lack of target diversity. Overall, there is evidence to support an ongoing increase in synthetic efficiency whereby, as a community, we are synthesizing larger, more-complex molecules from smaller, simpler starting materials, in fewer steps and with diminished reliance on nonproductive reaction types such as protecting group manipulations, redox reactions, and functional group interconversions.","PeriodicalId":55,"journal":{"name":"Organic Process Research & Development","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organic Process Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using a large data set (640k synthetic routes and 2.4m reactions) compiled from six popular journals between 2000 and 2020, trends are identified and discussed for topics including journal publishing rates, availability of machine-readable data, characteristics of synthetic route targets and starting materials (molecular weight, complexity, elemental composition, chirality, and ring systems), and the reaction classes utilized in these synthetic routes. We provide evidence of an ongoing shift away from large natural product or “total” syntheses among the academic data and a gradual increase in the size and complexity of industrial/medicinal target molecules. The reaction class analyses show key differences between the academic and industrial sectors and how a small number of reaction types have proliferated in the latter, giving rise to a possible lack of target diversity. Overall, there is evidence to support an ongoing increase in synthetic efficiency whereby, as a community, we are synthesizing larger, more-complex molecules from smaller, simpler starting materials, in fewer steps and with diminished reliance on nonproductive reaction types such as protecting group manipulations, redox reactions, and functional group interconversions.

Abstract Image

已公布的合成路线、路线目标和反应类型分析(2000-2020 年)
利用 2000 年至 2020 年期间从六种流行期刊中汇编的大型数据集(64 万条合成路线和 240 万个反应),我们确定并讨论了各种趋势,包括期刊发表率、机器可读数据的可用性、合成路线目标和起始材料的特征(分子量、复杂性、元素组成、手性和环系统)以及这些合成路线中使用的反应类别。我们提供的证据表明,在学术数据中,大型天然产物或 "整体 "合成正在逐渐减少,而工业/医药目标分子的大小和复杂性正在逐渐增加。反应类别分析表明了学术界和工业界之间的主要差异,以及少数反应类型是如何在后者中激增的,从而可能导致目标多样性的缺乏。总体而言,有证据支持合成效率的不断提高,作为一个群体,我们正以更少的步骤从更小、更简单的起始材料合成更大、更复杂的分子,并减少了对保护基操作、氧化还原反应和官能团相互转化等非生产性反应类型的依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
14.70%
发文量
251
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The journal Organic Process Research & Development serves as a communication tool between industrial chemists and chemists working in universities and research institutes. As such, it reports original work from the broad field of industrial process chemistry but also presents academic results that are relevant, or potentially relevant, to industrial applications. Process chemistry is the science that enables the safe, environmentally benign and ultimately economical manufacturing of organic compounds that are required in larger amounts to help address the needs of society. Consequently, the Journal encompasses every aspect of organic chemistry, including all aspects of catalysis, synthetic methodology development and synthetic strategy exploration, but also includes aspects from analytical and solid-state chemistry and chemical engineering, such as work-up tools,process safety, or flow-chemistry. The goal of development and optimization of chemical reactions and processes is their transfer to a larger scale; original work describing such studies and the actual implementation on scale is highly relevant to the journal. However, studies on new developments from either industry, research institutes or academia that have not yet been demonstrated on scale, but where an industrial utility can be expected and where the study has addressed important prerequisites for a scale-up and has given confidence into the reliability and practicality of the chemistry, also serve the mission of OPR&D as a communication tool between the different contributors to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信