School Readiness and Early Childhood Education and Care Services Among Dual Language Learners

IF 8.2 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Ophélie A. Collet, Pascale M. Domond, Cédric Galéra, Thuy Mai Luu, Tianna Loose, Alejandro Vásquez-Echeverría, Massimiliano Orri, Sylvana M. Côté
{"title":"School Readiness and Early Childhood Education and Care Services Among Dual Language Learners","authors":"Ophélie A. Collet, Pascale M. Domond, Cédric Galéra, Thuy Mai Luu, Tianna Loose, Alejandro Vásquez-Echeverría, Massimiliano Orri, Sylvana M. Côté","doi":"10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.4489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceDual language learners (DLL) (ie, children learning 2 or more languages) present lower school readiness than non-DLL children, putting DLL children at risk of later school difficulties and adverse outcomes. However, it is unclear whether participation in early childhood education and care (ECEC) services may reduce this gap.ObjectiveTo assess whether ECEC exposure may reduce the school readiness gap between DLL and non-DLL children in a population-based sample.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis census survey study was performed from February to May 2022 in the Canadian province of Quebec using data from the Quebec Survey of Child Development in Kindergarten, which includes all children who attended kindergarten in the 2021 to 2022 school year in public and private schools in Quebec (n = 80 587), except for Cree and Inuit territories.ExposureChildren’s ECEC arrangement before kindergarten was retrieved from register-based data and teachers and arrangements were categorized as exclusive parental care, childcare, pre-kindergarten only, or childcare and pre-kindergarten. Based on their mother tongue and language of instruction, children were classified as French speaking, English speaking, bilingual French-English speaking, or neither French nor English speaking (allophone) children, the last 2 groups of which represented the DLL category.Main Outcomes and MeasuresVulnerability in school readiness was defined as a score below the 10th percentile in any of the 5 domains of the validated Early Development Instrument (EDI): (1) physical health and well-being; (2) social competence; (3) emotional maturity; (4) language and cognitive development; and (5) communication skills and general knowledge.ResultsIn total, 80 587 children were surveyed, and 71 585 children were included in analyses. Mean (SD) child age was 6.0 (0.3) years, 34 911 children (48.8%) were female, and 18 341 children (25.6%) were DLL. English-speaking, bilingual French-English–speaking, and allophone children were more likely to be vulnerable in the EDI (769 of 2355 children [32.7%], 4814 of 13 981 children [34.4%], and 1622 of 4360 children [37.2%], respectively) than French-speaking children (13 664 of 50 890 children [26.9%]). In logistic regression analyses adjusted for social selection bias in ECEC arrangement, attending ECEC services was associated with a lower risk of being vulnerable among all language groups compared to parental care, with odds ratios ranging from 0.26 (95% CI, 0.25-0.27) to 0.96 (95% CI, 0.80-1.14), except in the emotional maturity domain. ECEC exposure was associated with reduction in vulnerabilities disparities between DLL and non-DLL children after adjusting for confounding factors, including socioeconomic status.Conclusions and RelevanceECEC services may foster school readiness for all children, especially DLL, and should be considered to reduce school inequalities.","PeriodicalId":24,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sensors","volume":"215 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.4489","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceDual language learners (DLL) (ie, children learning 2 or more languages) present lower school readiness than non-DLL children, putting DLL children at risk of later school difficulties and adverse outcomes. However, it is unclear whether participation in early childhood education and care (ECEC) services may reduce this gap.ObjectiveTo assess whether ECEC exposure may reduce the school readiness gap between DLL and non-DLL children in a population-based sample.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis census survey study was performed from February to May 2022 in the Canadian province of Quebec using data from the Quebec Survey of Child Development in Kindergarten, which includes all children who attended kindergarten in the 2021 to 2022 school year in public and private schools in Quebec (n = 80 587), except for Cree and Inuit territories.ExposureChildren’s ECEC arrangement before kindergarten was retrieved from register-based data and teachers and arrangements were categorized as exclusive parental care, childcare, pre-kindergarten only, or childcare and pre-kindergarten. Based on their mother tongue and language of instruction, children were classified as French speaking, English speaking, bilingual French-English speaking, or neither French nor English speaking (allophone) children, the last 2 groups of which represented the DLL category.Main Outcomes and MeasuresVulnerability in school readiness was defined as a score below the 10th percentile in any of the 5 domains of the validated Early Development Instrument (EDI): (1) physical health and well-being; (2) social competence; (3) emotional maturity; (4) language and cognitive development; and (5) communication skills and general knowledge.ResultsIn total, 80 587 children were surveyed, and 71 585 children were included in analyses. Mean (SD) child age was 6.0 (0.3) years, 34 911 children (48.8%) were female, and 18 341 children (25.6%) were DLL. English-speaking, bilingual French-English–speaking, and allophone children were more likely to be vulnerable in the EDI (769 of 2355 children [32.7%], 4814 of 13 981 children [34.4%], and 1622 of 4360 children [37.2%], respectively) than French-speaking children (13 664 of 50 890 children [26.9%]). In logistic regression analyses adjusted for social selection bias in ECEC arrangement, attending ECEC services was associated with a lower risk of being vulnerable among all language groups compared to parental care, with odds ratios ranging from 0.26 (95% CI, 0.25-0.27) to 0.96 (95% CI, 0.80-1.14), except in the emotional maturity domain. ECEC exposure was associated with reduction in vulnerabilities disparities between DLL and non-DLL children after adjusting for confounding factors, including socioeconomic status.Conclusions and RelevanceECEC services may foster school readiness for all children, especially DLL, and should be considered to reduce school inequalities.
双语学习者的入学准备和幼儿教育与保育服务
重要性双语学习者(DLL)(即学习 2 种或 2 种以上语言的儿童)的入学准备程度低于非双语学习者,这使双语学习者面临日后上学困难和不良后果的风险。目标在一个基于人口的样本中,评估参与早期儿童教育和保育(ECEC)服务是否会缩小 DLL 儿童和非 DLL 儿童之间的入学准备差距。设计、地点和参与者这项普查调查研究于 2022 年 2 月至 5 月在加拿大魁北克省进行,使用的数据来自《魁北克省幼儿园儿童发展调查》(Quebec Survey of Child Development in Kindergarten),其中包括 2021 至 2022 学年在魁北克省公立和私立学校上幼儿园的所有儿童(n = 80 587),克里人和因纽特人领地除外。暴露儿童上幼儿园前的幼儿保育和教育安排是从基于登记的数据中检索的,教师和安排被分为完全由父母照顾、托儿所、仅学前班或托儿所和学前班。根据母语和教学语言的不同,儿童被分为讲法语、讲英语、讲法英双语或既不讲法语也不讲英语(异母语)的儿童,其中后两组代表了 DLL 类别。主要结果和测量方法入学准备薄弱是指在有效的早期发展工具(EDI)的以下 5 个领域中的任何一个领域的得分低于第 10 百分位数:(1) 身体健康和幸福;(2) 社交能力;(3) 情感成熟;(4) 语言和认知发展;(5) 沟通技能和常识。平均(标清)年龄为 6.0 (0.3)岁,34 911 名儿童(48.8%)为女性,18 341 名儿童(25.6%)为 DLL。与法语儿童(50 890 名儿童中的 13 664 名[26.9%])相比,英语儿童、法英双语儿童和异音儿童更有可能在 EDI 中处于弱势(分别为 2355 名儿童中的 769 名[32.7%]、13 981 名儿童中的 4814 名[34.4%]和 4360 名儿童中的 1622 名[37.2%])。在调整了幼儿保育和教育安排的社会选择偏差后进行的逻辑回归分析中,与父母照顾相比,参加幼儿保育和教育服务与所有语言群体的弱势风险较低相关,几率比从0.26(95% CI,0.25-0.27)到0.96(95% CI,0.80-1.14)不等,但情绪成熟度领域除外。在对包括社会经济地位在内的混杂因素进行调整后,接受幼儿保育和教育的机会与减少 DLL 儿童和非 DLL 儿童之间的脆弱性差异有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Sensors
ACS Sensors Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
372
期刊介绍: ACS Sensors is a peer-reviewed research journal that focuses on the dissemination of new and original knowledge in the field of sensor science, particularly those that selectively sense chemical or biological species or processes. The journal covers a broad range of topics, including but not limited to biosensors, chemical sensors, gas sensors, intracellular sensors, single molecule sensors, cell chips, and microfluidic devices. It aims to publish articles that address conceptual advances in sensing technology applicable to various types of analytes or application papers that report on the use of existing sensing concepts in new ways or for new analytes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信