Claudia Maußner , Martin Oberascher , Arnold Autengruber , Arno Kahl , Robert Sitzenfrei
{"title":"Explainable artificial intelligence for reliable water demand forecasting to increase trust in predictions","authors":"Claudia Maußner , Martin Oberascher , Arnold Autengruber , Arno Kahl , Robert Sitzenfrei","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2024.122779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The “EU Artificial Intelligence Act” sets a framework for the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in Europe. As a legal assessment reveals, AI applications in water supply systems are categorised as high-risk AI if a failure in the AI application results in a significant impact on physical infrastructure or supply reliability. The use case of water demand forecasts with AI for automatic tank operation is for example categorised as high-risk AI and must fulfil specific requirements regarding model transparency (traceability, explainability) and technical robustness (accuracy, reliability). To this end, six widely established machine learning models, including both transparent and opaque models, are applied to different datasets for daily water demand forecasting and the requirements regarding model accuracy, transparency and technical robustness are systematically evaluated for this use case. Opaque models generally achieve higher prediction accuracy compared to transparent models due to their ability to capture the complex relationship between parameters like for example weather data and water demand. However, this also makes them vulnerable to deviations and irregularities in weather forecasts and historical water demand. In contrast, transparent models rely mainly on historical water demand data for the utilised dataset and are less influenced by weather data, making them more robust against various data irregularities. In summary, both transparent and opaque models can fulfil the requirements regarding explainability but differ in their level of transparency and robustness to input errors. The choice of model depends also on the operator's preferences and the context of the application.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"268 ","pages":"Article 122779"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135424016786","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The “EU Artificial Intelligence Act” sets a framework for the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in Europe. As a legal assessment reveals, AI applications in water supply systems are categorised as high-risk AI if a failure in the AI application results in a significant impact on physical infrastructure or supply reliability. The use case of water demand forecasts with AI for automatic tank operation is for example categorised as high-risk AI and must fulfil specific requirements regarding model transparency (traceability, explainability) and technical robustness (accuracy, reliability). To this end, six widely established machine learning models, including both transparent and opaque models, are applied to different datasets for daily water demand forecasting and the requirements regarding model accuracy, transparency and technical robustness are systematically evaluated for this use case. Opaque models generally achieve higher prediction accuracy compared to transparent models due to their ability to capture the complex relationship between parameters like for example weather data and water demand. However, this also makes them vulnerable to deviations and irregularities in weather forecasts and historical water demand. In contrast, transparent models rely mainly on historical water demand data for the utilised dataset and are less influenced by weather data, making them more robust against various data irregularities. In summary, both transparent and opaque models can fulfil the requirements regarding explainability but differ in their level of transparency and robustness to input errors. The choice of model depends also on the operator's preferences and the context of the application.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.