Matthew Davis, William Towner, Elliot DeHaan, Qin Jiang, Wen Li, Farah Rahman, Michael Patton, Hayley Wyper, Maria Maddalena Lino, Uzma N Sarwar, Zaynah Majid-Mahomed, Saumil Mehta, William Howitt, Kevin Cannon, Elena Kalinina, David Cooper, Kena A Swanson, Annaliesa S Anderson, Alejandra Gurtman, Iona Munjal
{"title":"Bivalent RSVpreF Vaccine in Adults 18 to <60 Years Old With High-Risk Conditions","authors":"Matthew Davis, William Towner, Elliot DeHaan, Qin Jiang, Wen Li, Farah Rahman, Michael Patton, Hayley Wyper, Maria Maddalena Lino, Uzma N Sarwar, Zaynah Majid-Mahomed, Saumil Mehta, William Howitt, Kevin Cannon, Elena Kalinina, David Cooper, Kena A Swanson, Annaliesa S Anderson, Alejandra Gurtman, Iona Munjal","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Older individuals and adults with certain chronic or immunocompromising health conditions are at increased risk of severe RSV disease. Methods In this phase 3 randomized trial of RSVpreF safety and immunogenicity in 18−59-year-olds at high-risk of severe RSV disease, participants were randomized 2:1 to 1 RSVpreF (120 µg) or placebo dose. Primary safety endpoints included reactogenicity events and adverse events (AEs) through 7 days and 1 month after vaccination, respectively, and serious AEs (SAEs) and newly diagnosed chronic medical conditions (NDCMCs) throughout the study. In primary analyses, immunogenicity elicited 1 month after RSVpreF was bridged to a randomly selected subset of ≥60-year-olds receiving RSVpreF from the immunogenicity subset in the pivotal phase 3 RENOIR trial, which demonstrated RSVpreF efficacy. Noninferiority was declared if 95% CI lower bounds were &gt;0.667 (neutralizing titer adjusted geometric mean ratios) and &gt;−10% (seroresponse rate differences) for RSV-A and RSV-B. Results Overall, 678 participants received RSVpreF (n=453) or placebo (n=225). Most reactogenicity events were mild/moderate; severe events occurred in ≤2.0% of participants overall. AE frequencies were similar in RSVpreF (7.1%) and placebo recipients (7.6%). No vaccine-related SAEs or NDCMCs were reported. One month after RSVpreF administration, noninferiority criteria were met in 18−59-year-olds versus ≥60-year-olds for RSV-A and RSV-B neutralizing titers and seroresponse rates. Conclusion RSVpreF was well tolerated with no safety concerns and demonstrated immunobridging to efficacy in 18−59-year-olds at high-risk of severe RSV disease versus ≥60-year-olds in whom efficacy was previously demonstrated, supporting use of RSVpreF to prevent RSV-associated disease in this population. NCT05842967.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae550","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Older individuals and adults with certain chronic or immunocompromising health conditions are at increased risk of severe RSV disease. Methods In this phase 3 randomized trial of RSVpreF safety and immunogenicity in 18−59-year-olds at high-risk of severe RSV disease, participants were randomized 2:1 to 1 RSVpreF (120 µg) or placebo dose. Primary safety endpoints included reactogenicity events and adverse events (AEs) through 7 days and 1 month after vaccination, respectively, and serious AEs (SAEs) and newly diagnosed chronic medical conditions (NDCMCs) throughout the study. In primary analyses, immunogenicity elicited 1 month after RSVpreF was bridged to a randomly selected subset of ≥60-year-olds receiving RSVpreF from the immunogenicity subset in the pivotal phase 3 RENOIR trial, which demonstrated RSVpreF efficacy. Noninferiority was declared if 95% CI lower bounds were >0.667 (neutralizing titer adjusted geometric mean ratios) and >−10% (seroresponse rate differences) for RSV-A and RSV-B. Results Overall, 678 participants received RSVpreF (n=453) or placebo (n=225). Most reactogenicity events were mild/moderate; severe events occurred in ≤2.0% of participants overall. AE frequencies were similar in RSVpreF (7.1%) and placebo recipients (7.6%). No vaccine-related SAEs or NDCMCs were reported. One month after RSVpreF administration, noninferiority criteria were met in 18−59-year-olds versus ≥60-year-olds for RSV-A and RSV-B neutralizing titers and seroresponse rates. Conclusion RSVpreF was well tolerated with no safety concerns and demonstrated immunobridging to efficacy in 18−59-year-olds at high-risk of severe RSV disease versus ≥60-year-olds in whom efficacy was previously demonstrated, supporting use of RSVpreF to prevent RSV-associated disease in this population. NCT05842967.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.