The danger theory of immunity revisited

Abstract

The danger theory of immunity, introduced by Polly Matzinger in 1994, posits that tissue stress, damage or infection has a decisive role in determining immune responses. Since then, a growing body of evidence has supported the idea that the capacity to elicit cognate immune responses (immunogenicity) relies on the combination of antigenicity (the ability to be recognized by T cell receptors or antibodies) and adjuvanticity (additional signals arising owing to tissue damage). Here, we discuss the molecular foundations of the danger theory while focusing on immunologically relevant damage-associated molecular patterns, microorganism-associated molecular patterns, and neuroendocrine stress-associated immunomodulatory molecules, as well as on their receptors. We critically evaluate patient-relevant evidence, examining how cancer cells and pathogenic viruses suppress damage-associated molecular patterns to evade immune recognition, how intestinal dysbiosis can reduce immunostimulatory microorganism-associated molecular patterns and compromise immune responses, and which hereditary immune defects support the validity of the danger theory. Furthermore, we incorporate the danger hypothesis into a close-to-fail-safe hierarchy of immunological tolerance mechanisms that also involve the clonal deletion and inactivation of immune cells.