Capabilities toward adoption of outcome-based contracts

IF 7.4 3区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Sameer Mittal, Veli-Matti Uski, Vinod Yadav, Muztoba Ahmad Khan, Hannu Kärkkäinen
{"title":"Capabilities toward adoption of outcome-based contracts","authors":"Sameer Mittal, Veli-Matti Uski, Vinod Yadav, Muztoba Ahmad Khan, Hannu Kärkkäinen","doi":"10.1108/jeim-10-2023-0551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Manufacturing enterprises have started to offer the “outcome” derived from machines with the help of outcome-based contracts (OBCs). Offering OBCs leads to benefits such as increased revenues, stronger customer relationships and sustainability. However, implementing OBCs requires critical capabilities. Existing literature has focused on identifying these necessary capabilities, but the prioritization and interrelationships among them remain unexplored. This study aims to address this gap.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Our study employs a hybrid analytical hierarchy process and interpretative structural modeling approach to prioritize and map interrelationships among OBC-related capabilities within small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings highlight the importance of digitalization capabilities such as data privacy and security, remote monitoring, and data analytics; and organizational and governance capabilities, including quantifying, controlling, and monitoring risks, teamwork, and leadership, are highlighted.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>We quantitatively prioritize OBC capabilities and establish their level-wise structural interrelationships, which will facilitate a more effective and efficient implementation of OBCs. Due to the emergent nature of OBCs, our study could identify just one SME case company meeting our selection criteria.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Existing OBC literature focusses on the design of OBCs in large companies. Similarly, earlier capability-related OBC literature is oriented toward identifying the OBC capabilities to perform specific functions. However, in the current study, we propose a systematic decision-making approach that comprehensively prioritizes and identifies the interrelationships among the capabilities necessary to provide OBCs, thus complementing the existing scientific literature on OBCs. In addition, we focus on SMEs, that have specific limitations and characteristics.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47889,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Enterprise Information Management","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Enterprise Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-10-2023-0551","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Manufacturing enterprises have started to offer the “outcome” derived from machines with the help of outcome-based contracts (OBCs). Offering OBCs leads to benefits such as increased revenues, stronger customer relationships and sustainability. However, implementing OBCs requires critical capabilities. Existing literature has focused on identifying these necessary capabilities, but the prioritization and interrelationships among them remain unexplored. This study aims to address this gap.

Design/methodology/approach

Our study employs a hybrid analytical hierarchy process and interpretative structural modeling approach to prioritize and map interrelationships among OBC-related capabilities within small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

Findings

The findings highlight the importance of digitalization capabilities such as data privacy and security, remote monitoring, and data analytics; and organizational and governance capabilities, including quantifying, controlling, and monitoring risks, teamwork, and leadership, are highlighted.

Research limitations/implications

We quantitatively prioritize OBC capabilities and establish their level-wise structural interrelationships, which will facilitate a more effective and efficient implementation of OBCs. Due to the emergent nature of OBCs, our study could identify just one SME case company meeting our selection criteria.

Originality/value

Existing OBC literature focusses on the design of OBCs in large companies. Similarly, earlier capability-related OBC literature is oriented toward identifying the OBC capabilities to perform specific functions. However, in the current study, we propose a systematic decision-making approach that comprehensively prioritizes and identifies the interrelationships among the capabilities necessary to provide OBCs, thus complementing the existing scientific literature on OBCs. In addition, we focus on SMEs, that have specific limitations and characteristics.

采用基于成果的合同的能力
目的制造企业已开始借助基于成果的合同(OBCs)来提供机器所产生的 "成果"。提供 OBC 可带来收益增加、客户关系加强和可持续发展等好处。然而,实施 OBC 需要具备关键能力。现有文献侧重于确定这些必要的能力,但它们之间的优先顺序和相互关系仍未得到探讨。设计/方法/途径我们的研究采用了层次分析法和解释性结构建模法的混合方法,对中小型企业(SMEs)中与 OBC 相关的能力进行了优先排序并绘制了它们之间的相互关系图。研究结果研究结果强调了数字化能力的重要性,如数据隐私和安全、远程监控和数据分析;同时强调了组织和治理能力的重要性,包括量化、控制和监控风险、团队合作和领导力。由于开放式商业公司的新兴性质,我们的研究只能确定一家符合我们选择标准的中小型企业案例公司。原创性/价值现有的开放式商业公司文献主要关注大公司的开放式商业公司设计。同样,早期与能力相关的开放式商业公司文献也是以确定开放式商业公司履行特定职能的能力为导向。然而,在当前的研究中,我们提出了一种系统决策方法,全面确定了提供开放式商业公司所需的能力的优先顺序和相互关系,从而对现有的开放式商业公司科学文献进行了补充。此外,我们将重点放在具有特定局限性和特点的中小企业上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Enterprise Information Management (JEIM) is a significant contributor to the normative literature, offering both conceptual and practical insights supported by innovative discoveries that enrich the existing body of knowledge. Within its pages, JEIM presents research findings sourced from globally renowned experts. These contributions encompass scholarly examinations of cutting-edge theories and practices originating from leading research institutions. Additionally, the journal features inputs from senior business executives and consultants, who share their insights gleaned from specific enterprise case studies. Through these reports, readers benefit from a comparative analysis of different environmental contexts, facilitating valuable learning experiences. JEIM's distinctive blend of theoretical analysis and practical application fosters comprehensive discussions on commercial discoveries. This approach enhances the audience's comprehension of contemporary, applied, and rigorous information management practices, which extend across entire enterprises and their intricate supply chains.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信