Attentional bias in tobacco use disorder using eye tracking: A systematic review

Noreen Rahmani , Alma Rahimi , Kameron Iturralde , Laurie Zawertailo
{"title":"Attentional bias in tobacco use disorder using eye tracking: A systematic review","authors":"Noreen Rahmani ,&nbsp;Alma Rahimi ,&nbsp;Kameron Iturralde ,&nbsp;Laurie Zawertailo","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Attentional bias, defined as the disproportionate attentional allocation towards drug-related stimuli, is well-demonstrated in substance use disorders. However, studies investigating attentional bias in tobacco use disorder have revealed inconclusive findings. In recent years, eye-tracking technology has emerged as an innovative technique for exploring attentional bias. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of eye-tracking studies examining attentional bias in tobacco use disorder.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using PRISMA guidelines, 18 papers that assessed attentional bias using eye-tracking technology among people who smoke cigarettes were extracted from the following databases: PsychINFO, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Search terms included “attentional bias”, “tobacco use disorder”, and “eye tracking” and their respective subject headings and synonyms. Selected papers were assessed for methodological quality using a standardized procedure. Selected studies reviewed were categorized into studies making comparisons between 1) people who smoke and people who do not smoke and 2) between smoking-related cues and neutral cues among people who smoke.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, most studies showed that people who smoke had significantly greater attentional bias to smoking-related cues, as indexed by greater dwell times and fixation counts. Although findings using measures of early orienting biases were mixed, people who smoke displayed a tendency to initially shift attention to smoking-related cues more frequently than neutral cues.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While methodological inconsistencies across studies preclude any definitive conclusions, findings suggest that maintained attention may be a more precise reflection of the specific attentional processes influenced by incentive salience. Suggestions for future research include establishing methodological standards for future eye-tracking studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Attentional bias, defined as the disproportionate attentional allocation towards drug-related stimuli, is well-demonstrated in substance use disorders. However, studies investigating attentional bias in tobacco use disorder have revealed inconclusive findings. In recent years, eye-tracking technology has emerged as an innovative technique for exploring attentional bias. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of eye-tracking studies examining attentional bias in tobacco use disorder.

Methods

Using PRISMA guidelines, 18 papers that assessed attentional bias using eye-tracking technology among people who smoke cigarettes were extracted from the following databases: PsychINFO, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Search terms included “attentional bias”, “tobacco use disorder”, and “eye tracking” and their respective subject headings and synonyms. Selected papers were assessed for methodological quality using a standardized procedure. Selected studies reviewed were categorized into studies making comparisons between 1) people who smoke and people who do not smoke and 2) between smoking-related cues and neutral cues among people who smoke.

Results

Overall, most studies showed that people who smoke had significantly greater attentional bias to smoking-related cues, as indexed by greater dwell times and fixation counts. Although findings using measures of early orienting biases were mixed, people who smoke displayed a tendency to initially shift attention to smoking-related cues more frequently than neutral cues.

Conclusions

While methodological inconsistencies across studies preclude any definitive conclusions, findings suggest that maintained attention may be a more precise reflection of the specific attentional processes influenced by incentive salience. Suggestions for future research include establishing methodological standards for future eye-tracking studies.
利用眼动追踪研究烟草使用障碍中的注意偏差:系统综述
背景注意偏差被定义为对药物相关刺激的过度注意分配,这在药物使用障碍中得到了充分的证实。然而,对烟草使用障碍中注意偏差的研究却没有得出结论。近年来,眼动追踪技术作为一种创新技术出现,用于探索注意偏差。本系统综述旨在全面概述有关烟草使用障碍中注意力偏差的眼动追踪研究。方法根据PRISMA指南,从以下数据库中提取了18篇使用眼动追踪技术评估吸烟者注意力偏差的论文:PsychINFO、MEDLINE 和 EMBASE。检索词包括 "注意偏差"、"烟草使用障碍 "和 "眼动追踪 "及其各自的主题词和同义词。采用标准化程序对所选论文进行方法学质量评估。所选研究分为两类:1)吸烟者与不吸烟者之间的比较研究;2)吸烟者之间与吸烟相关的线索和中性线索之间的比较研究。虽然使用早期定向偏差测量的结果不一,但吸烟者显示出一种倾向,即最初比中性线索更频繁地将注意力转移到与吸烟相关的线索上。结论虽然不同研究的方法不一致,无法得出任何明确的结论,但研究结果表明,保持注意力可能更准确地反映出受激励显著性影响的特定注意过程。对未来研究的建议包括为未来的眼动追踪研究建立方法标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence reports
Drug and alcohol dependence reports Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
100 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信