Psychological readiness to return-to-sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can be influenced by sex difference and functional assessment

Takeshi Oshima , Yoong Ping Lim , Brett Fritsch , David Parker
{"title":"Psychological readiness to return-to-sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can be influenced by sex difference and functional assessment","authors":"Takeshi Oshima ,&nbsp;Yoong Ping Lim ,&nbsp;Brett Fritsch ,&nbsp;David Parker","doi":"10.1016/j.jorep.2024.100506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The primary aim was to evaluate the Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scores before- and after-functional assessment in male and female Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstructed patients at a 9-month follow-up. (1st and 2nd ACL-RSI score, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study included 201 patients (Sex, 119 males and 82 females; Age, 27.0 ± 9.1 yrs.) who underwent primary isolated ACL reconstruction and performed a functional assessment at a 9-month follow-up appointment. Clinical measurements include: anthropometric measurement, patient-reported outcome measures, knee laxity assessment, knee muscle strength, and functional tasks. The ACL-RSI questionnaire was administered before and after the functional assessment. Statistical models were used to detect statistical differences and correlations between variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The 2nd ACL-RSI score was significantly higher than 1st ACL-RSI score in both the male and female groups (p &lt; 0.001). The 2nd ACL-RSI score was higher in the males than females (p = 0.035). In the female group, ACL-RSI change was significantly negatively correlated with hop for distance (r = −0.255, p = 0.021) and hop for height (r = −0.259, p = 0.019).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ACL-RSI score was significantly improved after the functional assessment in both males and females. Compared to the female group, the 2nd ACL-RSI score was significantly higher in the male group. The change in ACL-RSI scores from pre-to post-functional test was negatively correlated with functional performance in the female group but not with the male group. Clinicians should consider sex difference as well as change in psychological readiness between pre- and post-functional assessment of their patients to inform safe return of sport.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>Sex differences and repeated assessment should be considered for postoperative evaluation of psychological readiness for return to sport because ACL-RSI was determined to be sensitive to these factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24002017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The primary aim was to evaluate the Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scores before- and after-functional assessment in male and female Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstructed patients at a 9-month follow-up. (1st and 2nd ACL-RSI score, respectively).

Methods

This study included 201 patients (Sex, 119 males and 82 females; Age, 27.0 ± 9.1 yrs.) who underwent primary isolated ACL reconstruction and performed a functional assessment at a 9-month follow-up appointment. Clinical measurements include: anthropometric measurement, patient-reported outcome measures, knee laxity assessment, knee muscle strength, and functional tasks. The ACL-RSI questionnaire was administered before and after the functional assessment. Statistical models were used to detect statistical differences and correlations between variables.

Results

The 2nd ACL-RSI score was significantly higher than 1st ACL-RSI score in both the male and female groups (p < 0.001). The 2nd ACL-RSI score was higher in the males than females (p = 0.035). In the female group, ACL-RSI change was significantly negatively correlated with hop for distance (r = −0.255, p = 0.021) and hop for height (r = −0.259, p = 0.019).

Conclusion

ACL-RSI score was significantly improved after the functional assessment in both males and females. Compared to the female group, the 2nd ACL-RSI score was significantly higher in the male group. The change in ACL-RSI scores from pre-to post-functional test was negatively correlated with functional performance in the female group but not with the male group. Clinicians should consider sex difference as well as change in psychological readiness between pre- and post-functional assessment of their patients to inform safe return of sport.

Clinical relevance

Sex differences and repeated assessment should be considered for postoperative evaluation of psychological readiness for return to sport because ACL-RSI was determined to be sensitive to these factors.
前十字韧带重建后重返运动场的心理准备程度会受到性别差异和功能评估的影响
背景主要目的是评估男性和女性前交叉韧带(ACL)重建患者在9个月随访时的前交叉韧带-损伤后恢复运动(ACL-RSI)功能评估前后的评分(分别为第1次和第2次ACL-RSI评分)。(本研究纳入了 201 名接受原发性孤立前交叉韧带重建术的患者(性别:男性 119 人,女性 82 人;年龄:27.0 ± 9.1 岁),并在 9 个月的随访中进行了功能评估。临床测量包括:人体测量、患者报告结果测量、膝关节松弛评估、膝关节肌力和功能任务。在进行功能评估之前和之后,还进行了 ACL-RSI 问卷调查。统计模型用于检测变量之间的统计差异和相关性。结果男女组的第二次 ACL-RSI 评分均显著高于第一次 ACL-RSI 评分(p <0.001)。男性的第二次 ACL-RSI 评分高于女性(p = 0.035)。在女性组中,前交叉韧带-RSI 的变化与跳跃距离(r = -0.255,p = 0.021)和跳跃高度(r = -0.259,p = 0.019)呈显著负相关。与女性组相比,男性组的第二次 ACL-RSI 评分明显更高。女性组 ACL-RSI 分数从功能测试前到测试后的变化与功能表现呈负相关,而男性组则不然。临床医生应考虑患者的性别差异以及功能测试前后心理准备的变化,为患者安全重返运动场提供依据。临床意义在术后评估重返运动场的心理准备时,应考虑性别差异和重复评估,因为 ACL-RSI 被确定对这些因素很敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信