Triple water rinsing does not always render waste plastic pesticide containers non-hazardous waste

IF 7.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Georgios Garbounis , Helen Karasali , Dimitrios Komilis
{"title":"Triple water rinsing does not always render waste plastic pesticide containers non-hazardous waste","authors":"Georgios Garbounis ,&nbsp;Helen Karasali ,&nbsp;Dimitrios Komilis","doi":"10.1016/j.wasman.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>After pesticide application onto crops, waste plastic pesticide containers (WPPC) may still contain residual active substances (AS) that are typically hazardous. Specific limits exist per pesticide active substance to classify WPPC as hazardous or non-hazardous wastes. The most frequent limit is 0.1% w/w (mass of active substance per mass of as received container). Triple rinsing is a widely used management technique to decontaminate WPPC and determine their downstream management. However, its efficiency needs to be evaluated for new types of pesticides. The goal of the work was to measure the residual contents of 15 new pesticide AS, widely used all over the world, before and after triple rinsing using 56 WPPC. In addition, the contents of pesticide AS sorbed onto the plastic containers are analyzed for the first time. Results show that all unrinsed WPPC had residual AS contents above the hazard limits except for four AS. Triple rinsing removed from 68.3% (minimum) to 99.9% (maximum) of the liquid contents of 15 active substances. However, due to high variances of the AS contents after triple rinsing, mean values before and after rinsing were statistically equal for 8 out of 14 AS. The sorbed AS contents ranged from 3% to 97% of the total AS content. Only Azoxystrobin’s total content (i.e. the sum of liquid and sorbed phases) slightly exceeded the hazard limit of 0.1% w/w. Conclusively, triple rinsing may not always lead to AS content reductions below hazard limits. The sorbed contents should be considered to check legal compliances.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23969,"journal":{"name":"Waste management","volume":"191 ","pages":"Pages 47-55"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X24005610","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After pesticide application onto crops, waste plastic pesticide containers (WPPC) may still contain residual active substances (AS) that are typically hazardous. Specific limits exist per pesticide active substance to classify WPPC as hazardous or non-hazardous wastes. The most frequent limit is 0.1% w/w (mass of active substance per mass of as received container). Triple rinsing is a widely used management technique to decontaminate WPPC and determine their downstream management. However, its efficiency needs to be evaluated for new types of pesticides. The goal of the work was to measure the residual contents of 15 new pesticide AS, widely used all over the world, before and after triple rinsing using 56 WPPC. In addition, the contents of pesticide AS sorbed onto the plastic containers are analyzed for the first time. Results show that all unrinsed WPPC had residual AS contents above the hazard limits except for four AS. Triple rinsing removed from 68.3% (minimum) to 99.9% (maximum) of the liquid contents of 15 active substances. However, due to high variances of the AS contents after triple rinsing, mean values before and after rinsing were statistically equal for 8 out of 14 AS. The sorbed AS contents ranged from 3% to 97% of the total AS content. Only Azoxystrobin’s total content (i.e. the sum of liquid and sorbed phases) slightly exceeded the hazard limit of 0.1% w/w. Conclusively, triple rinsing may not always lead to AS content reductions below hazard limits. The sorbed contents should be considered to check legal compliances.
三倍水冲洗并不总能使废弃塑料杀虫剂容器成为无害废物
在农作物上施用农药后,废塑料农药容器(WPPC)仍可能含有残留的活性物质(AS),而这些物质通常是有害的。每种农药活性物质都有特定的限制,可将 WPPC 划分为危险废物或非危险废物。最常见的限值是 0.1% w/w(活性物质的质量/接收容器的质量)。三重漂洗是一种广泛使用的管理技术,用于净化 WPPC 并确定其下游管理。然而,需要对新型农药的效率进行评估。这项工作的目标是在使用 56 个 WPPC 进行三重漂洗之前和之后,测量在全球广泛使用的 15 种新农药 AS 的残留含量。此外,还首次分析了吸附在塑料容器上的农药 AS 的含量。结果表明,除四种 AS 外,所有未经漂洗的 WPPC 的残留 AS 含量都超过了危害限值。三重漂洗可去除 68.3%(最少)至 99.9%(最多)的 15 种活性物质的液体含量。不过,由于三重漂洗后的 AS 含量差异较大,在 14 种 AS 中,有 8 种在漂洗前后的平均值在统计上是相等的。吸附的 AS 含量占总 AS 含量的比例从 3% 到 97% 不等。只有唑啉草酯的总含量(即液相和吸附相的总和)略微超过了 0.1% w/w 的危害限值。总之,三重漂洗不一定能使 AS 含量降至危害限值以下。在检查是否符合法律规定时,应考虑吸附含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Waste management
Waste management 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
492
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Waste Management is devoted to the presentation and discussion of information on solid wastes,it covers the entire lifecycle of solid. wastes. Scope: Addresses solid wastes in both industrialized and economically developing countries Covers various types of solid wastes, including: Municipal (e.g., residential, institutional, commercial, light industrial) Agricultural Special (e.g., C and D, healthcare, household hazardous wastes, sewage sludge)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信